S. Cassell vs D. Fisher
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
S. Cassell vs D. Fisher
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,718
- And1: 45
- Joined: May 05, 2007
S. Cassell vs D. Fisher
Who you take RIGHT NOW if your team is a contender?
- Texas Longhorns
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,005
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jan 08, 2008
- Location: Cockrell School of Engineering
- Contact:
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,602
- And1: 30
- Joined: Oct 10, 2006
- Location: why you take out my sig for?
- raps4life~
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,664
- And1: 25
- Joined: Mar 13, 2007
- Location: California
-
-
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 92,222
- And1: 31,807
- Joined: Oct 14, 2003
-
Cassell; Fisher's value as a defender is primarily on account of his willingness and ability to take charges, not as a man-on defender.
He's a better 3pt shooter but considerably less effective as an isolation/mid-range scorer and playmaker/distributor.
Sam I Am has a lot more value at present than does Fisher. Fisher is more valuable somewhere like L.A. where his role is fairly simple and his perimeter shot is more valuable than the other skills at which Cassell is vastly superior.
He's a better 3pt shooter but considerably less effective as an isolation/mid-range scorer and playmaker/distributor.
Sam I Am has a lot more value at present than does Fisher. Fisher is more valuable somewhere like L.A. where his role is fairly simple and his perimeter shot is more valuable than the other skills at which Cassell is vastly superior.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,353
- And1: 2
- Joined: Apr 03, 2006
tsherkin wrote:Cassell; Fisher's value as a defender is primarily on account of his willingness and ability to take charges, not as a man-on defender.
He's a better 3pt shooter but considerably less effective as an isolation/mid-range scorer and playmaker/distributor.
Sam I Am has a lot more value at present than does Fisher. Fisher is more valuable somewhere like L.A. where his role is fairly simple and his perimeter shot is more valuable than the other skills at which Cassell is vastly superior.
Really? So if you have the choice between Fisher or Cassell as a back-up point guard for the Raptors, you'd rather have Sam?
I think the big thing here is that Derek Fisher is so much more durable and mobile, he can do a lot more things on the court due to his physical abilities. I'm not disagreeing Cassell is more versatile on offense, that's true. But how many minutes can he give you, 10, maybe 12 good minutes a game? Derek Fisher is playing some of the best ball he's ever played and is able to play at a high level as a starter.
-
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 92,222
- And1: 31,807
- Joined: Oct 14, 2003
-
Kosta wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Really? So if you have the choice between Fisher or Cassell as a back-up point guard for the Raptors, you'd rather have Sam?
Absolutely. The Raptors need shot creators, not stand-still shooters, we have tons of those.
I think the big thing here is that Derek Fisher is so much more durable and mobile, he can do a lot more things on the court due to his physical abilities. I'm not disagreeing Cassell is more versatile on offense, that's true. But how many minutes can he give you, 10, maybe 12 good minutes a game? Derek Fisher is playing some of the best ball he's ever played and is able to play at a high level as a starter.
Actually, about 25, that's what he was giving the Clippers before the trade while he was averaging about 12 and 5.
Fisher is shooting very well and that's helping him but that's hardly a surprise given his role and the environment in which he's playing.
A third of his shots are threes and his made threes represent a third of his scoring average as well. As to the rest, well, the triangle offense as run with Kobe, Odom and Bynum (and then Gasol)...
When no one on the other team really cares about you because 3/5s of the team is composed of more dangerous players, you tend to perform well. Notice that Fisher's stats closely resemble those he posted in the Lakers' second and third title years from the early part of the decade?
There's a reason for that; he's wide the Hell open so often that it happens.
Cassell is more valuable than that because his efficacy is not limited to stunningly open jumpers. Once you ask Fisher to do a lot more than hit those, you might as well put Farmar on in his stead because he'll be a lot more effective.
- CITYOFANGELSX3
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,011
- And1: 151
- Joined: May 31, 2007
- Location: Southside, Ca
-