G35 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Just because he has a physical limitation doesn't mean it isn't a weakness. He's a small guy, he can be posted up. Which brings me to my next point.
Stats are important, but why didn't you show any stats for the defensive side? How well does Paul defend PG's?
Taking a cursory look I've seen that PG's have had quite a bit of success going against Paul. They usually shoot at a high % and have some scoring success.
From what I've seen if Paul can't steal the ball then he becomes less of a defensive presence. Since he is only 6'0 180 lbs.......
Exactly. Why do people balk at the notion that CP is physically limited in what he can do as a defender? It doesn't mean that he can't become the next Gary Payton, but even Gary Payton wasn't as good a defender as Scottie Pippen. This is a sport--size matters.
Even a Kobe Fan can accept the notion that LeBron may one day be a better defender than Kobe given his ability to possibly guard 4.5 positions.
Isn't that why we valued Magic so much? In his rookie year, he managed the rock on one end and plugged the middle on the other end. Can we not say that based on that unique ability, Magic is better than most PG's?
I mean, maybe Earl Boykins is a great defender at his size. The only problem is, no one else is at his size, which makes him a defensive liability. CP may be a great defender at his size, but again, there's only so many player at his size.
I mean, are we not allowed to value Billups and Williams for their stature because they can fight screens easier and bump opposing PG's off plays?