Who wins in 7: Lakers or Suns

That Nicka · Post #121 » by **That Nicka** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 5:42 am

NapoleonII wrote:Lol calm the **** down. I'm predicting the lakers won't be at full strength for the playoffs. Argue all you want, I really couldn't care less.

why are you telling me to calm down?

Ballings7 · Post #122 » by **Ballings7** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 5:47 am

And yeah, if I see that the Lakers health isn't enough by playoff time, I gotta go with the Suns in 5-6 games. It's not solid right now for the Lakes, but there's still a handful of weeks left till the playoffs.

ilikecb4 · Post #123 » by **ilikecb4** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 6:07 am

Farmar>Nash
Radmanovic>Amare
Turiaf>Shaq

tnayrbrocks · Post #124 » by **tnayrbrocks** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 7:38 pm

lol if the lakers were at full strength, they would beat phx in 4-5 games. Without bynum or gasol I can see the game going to 6 or 7 but the Lakers just killed with just one of the those guys although the gasol game was pretty close. And by killed concerning the gasol game i mean that they had the ability to keep up with and demoralize the suns at phx.

Without either of these guys suns in 4 or 5, it's sad.

thamadkant · Post #125 » by **thamadkant** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 9:02 pm

That match up, Shaq's first game is hard to judge by.

Suns didnt just lost to Lakers that week, they lost to a lot of teams they usually will be competitive with or beat.

HarlemHeat37 · Post #126 » by **HarlemHeat37** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 9:23 pm

I still don't see how the Suns would lose in 4 or 5 games..

Post #127 » by **eyriq** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 9:39 pm

I'll say Suns in seven. That fron court with Shaq and Amare is just too much for the Lakers, or anyone, to handle. Now that they are gelling they look scary.

TonyMontana · Post #128 » by **TonyMontana** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 10:36 pm

BRINGTHEPAIN wrote:Kobe has trouble with important playoff games like game7s and NBA Finals games, so if it goes 7 then Lakers have no chance.

Okay we'll take your word for it . :banghead:

TonyMontana · Post #129 » by **TonyMontana** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 10:47 pm

jboogy13 wrote:im sorry laker fans but phoenix is just the better team and theyve proven that to you guys for the past two seasons...i mean its not the suns fault that u guys blew a wide open 3-1 series and a 6th game in which the suns were without raja bell and kobe scored 50 but u guys still lost on your home court so>>>>>>

Speechless ......... If you havent noticed lately .
Lakers are leading the series 3-1 against the Suns this year in regular season , and thats without Bynum .
So you are making these assumptions about this year simply because of what happened in the past two years .

Look at the Celtics this year , I guess there not good either , or better yet , look at Houston .

I guess your right , the Lakers arent good to win even with the additon of Pau and with Bynum back :rofl:

.

TonyMontana · Post #130 » by **TonyMontana** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 10:58 pm

eyriq wrote:I'll say Suns in seven. That fron court with Shaq and Amare is just too much for the Lakers, or anyone, to handle. Now that they are gelling they look scary.

I guess the front court of Kobe , Pau , L.O and Bynum is not scary ?
Also gelling , I dont think a record of 12-8 , where 7 of those wins was against a sub 500 teams , and 4 of those loses was against teams in their own conference considered gelling .

eatyourchildren · Post #131 » by **eatyourchildren** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:33 pm

The Suns have gelled nicely. I'll say it even as a Lakers fans. But it doesn't mean the Suns will kill the Lakers in 5.

From what I've gathered, Lakers want to see the Suns further into the playoffs, and the Suns wants to see the Lakers earlier in the playoffs.

I mean, if that's the sentiment, there's no hands-down winner right? Or is Shaq-Amare still KILLING Bynum-Gasol no matter what?