What 2 players would you take?

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

VintaGe36
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,032
And1: 88
Joined: May 04, 2007
       

 

Post#21 » by VintaGe36 » Tue Apr 1, 2008 4:48 am

Paul + West
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,148
And1: 9,858
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

 

Post#22 » by Blame Rasho » Tue Apr 1, 2008 4:55 am

RUSSDUCK wrote:I'd take Kobe and Bynum. You get the savy veteran, and the up and coming young big man.


I like your thinking...
User avatar
Cammo101
Mr. Mock Draft
Posts: 30,850
And1: 2,010
Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Location: Austin, TX
     

 

Post#23 » by Cammo101 » Tue Apr 1, 2008 6:22 am

Kobe is the MAN wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I like your thinking...


Except you would split the difference and do neither. Kobe and Bynum and a bunch of stiffs won't win a title and a team led by Bynum once Kobe is past his prime won't win a title. You simply can not win now and win later in the NBA, you have to go one way or the other. This is the kind of thinking that keeps teams like Indy and Sacramento in constant middle ground of trying to do both a little and end up doing neither.
User avatar
ponder276
Head Coach
Posts: 6,075
And1: 67
Joined: Oct 14, 2007

 

Post#24 » by ponder276 » Tue Apr 1, 2008 6:59 am

Cammo101 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Except you would split the difference and do neither. Kobe and Bynum and a bunch of stiffs won't win a title and a team led by Bynum once Kobe is past his prime won't win a title. You simply can not win now and win later in the NBA, you have to go one way or the other. This is the kind of thinking that keeps teams like Indy and Sacramento in constant middle ground of trying to do both a little and end up doing neither.

Oh no? Looking at championships won since 1980:

Lakers:
5 championships in 9 seasons (80-88 )
3 championships in 3 seasons (00-02)

Bulls:
6 championships in 8 seasons (91-98 )

Spurs:
4 championships in 9 seasons (99-07)

Celtics:
3 championships in 6 seasons (81-86)


Quite a few teams have been able to win now and win later. It actually seems like more championships are won by dynasties than by teams that blow their load on one championship and then fade back to obscurity, Miami Heat style.
I didn't even include the Celtic's 11 championships in 13 years :wink:
chrice
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,326
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 25, 2005

 

Post#25 » by chrice » Tue Apr 1, 2008 7:55 am

Derekman wrote:Kobe and Bynum. Win now and later.



Yea right. That's an expansion team geared towards losing. The team will be just good enough to not make the playoffs and screw with their draft position. By the time the team is fully built, you might be lucky to get to the finals **once** before Kobe retires.
Image
Jemini80
Banned User
Posts: 6,437
And1: 2
Joined: Oct 29, 2007

 

Post#26 » by Jemini80 » Tue Apr 1, 2008 7:56 am

Kevin Durant and Derrick Rose

if that isn't a viable answer, then I'm going to go outside the box here and go with Josh Smith and Al Horford.
User avatar
jazzfan1971
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 39,327
And1: 8,581
Joined: Jul 16, 2001
Location: Salt Lake City
 

 

Post#27 » by jazzfan1971 » Tue Apr 1, 2008 9:07 pm

I left out draft picks on purpose, as they are too much of a crap shoot.

But, if you'd stake your team on a Derrick Rose over a more proven guy, I guess that's your choice. Although, it's one sure way to be fired as a GM :D
"Thibs called back and wanted more picks," said Jorge Sedano. "And Pat Riley, literally, I was told, called him a mother-bleeper and hung up the phone."
User avatar
sh00n
RealGM
Posts: 20,409
And1: 1,996
Joined: Jul 15, 2006
Contact:
       

 

Post#28 » by sh00n » Wed Apr 2, 2008 8:36 am

Roy and Oden
Smith and Horford
Deron and Boozer
Paul and West
Support your local artist, kids: http://www.katsenhakeron.com
@katsenhaker0n on the bird app
vct33
Veteran
Posts: 2,533
And1: 850
Joined: Feb 17, 2008
       

 

Post#29 » by vct33 » Wed Apr 2, 2008 12:09 pm

TheSheriff wrote:Lebron and a stiff.


And BINGO was his name-o!!!!! That's my choice for sure.
Ballings7
RealGM
Posts: 24,090
And1: 1,970
Joined: Jan 04, 2006

 

Post#30 » by Ballings7 » Wed Apr 2, 2008 10:49 pm

Deron and Boozer

Rest of starting five would be like:

SG: Defensive specialist that can make open jumpshots and can drive effectively.

SF: Utility guy; Good slasher/finisher, reliable shooter, above-average defender, brings energy, has some creating ability.

C: Strong interior defender; Shot alterer/blocker at the basket, has an adequate offensive game, specifically containing a mid-range jumper. Helper and compatability for Boozer.
a-rod
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,778
And1: 21
Joined: Aug 12, 2006
Location: Rest In Peace Dad
Contact:
       

 

Post#31 » by a-rod » Wed Apr 2, 2008 11:02 pm

Ballings7 wrote:Deron and Boozer

Rest of starting five would be like:

SG: Defensive specialist that can make open jumpshots and can drive effectively.

SF: Utility guy; Good slasher/finisher, reliable shooter, above-average defender, brings energy, has some creating ability.

C: Strong interior defender; Shot alterer/blocker at the basket, has an adequate offensive game, specifically containing a mid-range jumper. Helper and compatability for Boozer.

Indeed, i agree....
pillwenney wrote:
SacKingZZZ wrote:No thanks to Deng. I read a rumor surfing hoopshype awhile back saying Gay for Reke is a possibility.


Must be true, if it's a rumor you read on Hoopshype.
:rofl:
User avatar
jazzfan1971
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 39,327
And1: 8,581
Joined: Jul 16, 2001
Location: Salt Lake City
 

 

Post#32 » by jazzfan1971 » Thu Apr 3, 2008 1:05 am

Maybe

PG - Deron
SG - DeShawn Stevenson
SF - Ronnie Brewer
PF - Boozer
C - Dalembert
"Thibs called back and wanted more picks," said Jorge Sedano. "And Pat Riley, literally, I was told, called him a mother-bleeper and hung up the phone."
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,116
And1: 20,135
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

 

Post#33 » by NO-KG-AI » Thu Apr 3, 2008 1:07 am

LeBron and an expiring contract :lol:
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
User avatar
candy for lunch
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,583
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 20, 2007

 

Post#34 » by candy for lunch » Thu Apr 3, 2008 8:26 am

Roy and Oden
User avatar
Young_Star11
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,282
And1: 1,767
Joined: Oct 28, 2005
Location: RealGM
   

 

Post#35 » by Young_Star11 » Thu Apr 3, 2008 9:34 am

Deron and Boozer - both young and they could do with a better suited supporting cast.

The current Utah cast is not bad at all, but Okur's not the guy to play next to Boozer.

Kobe and Bynum - Kobe has a few elite years left in him. If Bynum can pick up where he left off, he's going to be elite for ten years.

Return to Player Comparisons


cron