Any thoughts on the Celtics young bigs Powe n Big Baby Davis
Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
Any thoughts on the Celtics young bigs Powe n Big Baby Davis
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,725
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jan 11, 2005
Any thoughts on the Celtics young bigs Powe n Big Baby Davis
What are your thoughts on them? They are playing well but is it a case of just a great environment or are they going to be players in this league? Also what are some thoughts on Powe's market value in the off season.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,468
- And1: 4,001
- Joined: May 05, 2005
- Location: Oakland
-
Powe has a scorers mentality and if u watch the C's games...everytime he gets the ball he will go for a shot. He's a solid bench player in the NBA, but i dont think he will earn big bucks anywhere. They are a product of the system...opponents have to focus on the big three so leave guys like powe and baby open.
Kuya wrote: a good agent collects all the data, including quotes to give them leverage in contract deals.
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,754
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 08, 2005
I was close to the court at the celtics vs. bobcats game tonight and actually specifically mentioned several times how impressed I was with the two young bigs.
They dispelled the "system" and "big three" argument (for one night at least) by playing very well with Ray, KG, and Pierce all out. Powe was aggressive going to the glass, showed good hands, and a solid post scoring ability. His defense was decent but didn't jump out at me as spectacular.
Davis showed some solid spin and hook moves, the typical bread and butter stuff we've seen since his college days. He's a big body to move from the block, but he will have to improve defensively.
If anything that tandems defensive shortcomings are being masked by the Celtics great team D. Regardless of that, i think they both have a future in the league and will at least be solid rotation players for years to come.
They dispelled the "system" and "big three" argument (for one night at least) by playing very well with Ray, KG, and Pierce all out. Powe was aggressive going to the glass, showed good hands, and a solid post scoring ability. His defense was decent but didn't jump out at me as spectacular.
Davis showed some solid spin and hook moves, the typical bread and butter stuff we've seen since his college days. He's a big body to move from the block, but he will have to improve defensively.
If anything that tandems defensive shortcomings are being masked by the Celtics great team D. Regardless of that, i think they both have a future in the league and will at least be solid rotation players for years to come.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,617
- And1: 198
- Joined: Jun 29, 2005
- Location: Welcome back the Comeback King !
i love powe's game
Dwight Howard on his FT struggles:
"I just think everybody needs to stop talking about it," Howard said. "There's more to life than free throws."
- exkonvict
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,251
- And1: 1
- Joined: Nov 02, 2006
- Location: The OC, California
- Contact:
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,090
- And1: 1,970
- Joined: Jan 04, 2006
I've been into Powe since his rookie year... he produces consistently on both ends of the court. I've come to like him a lot as another under-sized, tough complementary big man.
Big Baby is showing why he's a 2nd round gem, enjoyable player, surprised he's done this well, though.
Both are mature, skilled, consistent, and confident young players - but I'm questionable about how they'll do in the playoffs. Especially in relation to the refs. However much they're used. Be interesting to watch that.
Big Baby is showing why he's a 2nd round gem, enjoyable player, surprised he's done this well, though.
Both are mature, skilled, consistent, and confident young players - but I'm questionable about how they'll do in the playoffs. Especially in relation to the refs. However much they're used. Be interesting to watch that.
The Playoffs don't care about your Analytics
- Rooster
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 25,140
- And1: 11
- Joined: Aug 26, 2005
- Location: Frozen Wasteland
1eyedjake wrote:They're a little undersized height-wise but they give a little bit of what Indiana had in the early days of Dale/Antonio Davis maybe. (When they came off the bench.)
I'm not seeing that at all. Dale was a double-double guy who shot 55% from the floor, got 1+SPG/BPG and was about 6'11" 250lbs. AD was maybe a bit more like Powe/Davis but even he was more of a defender. If anyone on that team is like Dale, for one, it's Perky.
Schadenfreude wrote:Not going to lie, if I found out that one of the seemingly illiterate morons we'd banned on the Raptors board was Primoz Brezec, it'd pretty much make my decade.
- Texas Longhorns
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,005
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jan 08, 2008
- Location: Cockrell School of Engineering
- Contact:
- Albanian Damien
- Starter
- Posts: 2,199
- And1: 639
- Joined: Jun 12, 2007
I am absolutely in love with Powe. He is an all out Hustle guy. A lot of his points come from the fact that he never quits, he wants every ball, and the fact that his a terrific finisher. In fact he even had a game winner vs. Minny off of pure hustle. He would be a great pickup for any team and he's definitely and integral part to a championship team.
Big Baby is very similar. He finishes very well and is a beat in the post because of his size. However I think he could still use improvement on his post game on both sides of the court. He also needs to trim down a bit, keep the mass but lose the fat. He too would be a great pick up for any team.
Big Baby is very similar. He finishes very well and is a beat in the post because of his size. However I think he could still use improvement on his post game on both sides of the court. He also needs to trim down a bit, keep the mass but lose the fat. He too would be a great pick up for any team.
My Starting 5:
PG: Allen Iverson
SG: Paul Pierce
SF: Kevin Durant
PF: Kevin Garnett
C: Patrick Ewing
PG: Allen Iverson
SG: Paul Pierce
SF: Kevin Durant
PF: Kevin Garnett
C: Patrick Ewing
- sixers_610
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,716
- And1: 68
- Joined: Dec 30, 2001
- Location: World F&!@&!@ Champions
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,853
- And1: 192
- Joined: Mar 25, 2008
What you have to remember is Powe played a lot of minutes when Garnett went down with an injury. He's been with the bench for the most part since then. He hasn't benefitted much at all from Garnett since they haven't played together too much. After next season, they'll likely have to make a choice between keeping Powe or Big Baby as they do play the same position and both are prospects who likely want consistent minutes. My guess is they'll keep Powe and trade Big Baby or he'll leave for free agency. If Powe's knees can hold up throughout his career, he could easily be a 20/10 player. Big Baby should become a quality starter at some point. Ainge did very well drafting both considering their position.
- TA42
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,813
- And1: 772
- Joined: Sep 11, 2004
- Location: MA
-
GYBE wrote:Does anyone have Powe's stats per 40 minutes? I don't think he could play that much until he cuts down on his fouls, but I'd be interested in seeing it.
Well, at this moment it would be tough for him to be on the floor for 40 minutes due to his fouls but here's the numbers:
PER 40:
PTS - 21.6
REB - 11.5
BLK - 0.9
STL - 0.8
AST - 0.6
TO - 2.0
Powe was a 20/10 guy in college and has a knack for being in the right place at the right time. He's also very scrappy and often times outhustles other bigs for rebounds and put backs.
This year he has done well enough to be the first "big" off the bench, which puts him in the top 7-8 in the rotation.
He's also one of the genuinely good people in the NBA.
/ends this Powe Service Announcement