Horford vs. Scola
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
Horford vs. Scola
- High 5
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,665
- And1: 2,205
- Joined: Apr 21, 2006
Horford vs. Scola
Who is better right now?
- NO-KG-AI
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 44,087
- And1: 20,038
- Joined: Jul 19, 2005
- Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets
- SOUL
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,739
- And1: 40,783
- Joined: Dec 11, 2006
- Location: █████████████
-
Horford easily.. and he'll be better in the future, though I think Scola could be a good piece for a championship team.
www.rareslums.com // please support my writing!
- NO-KG-AI
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 44,087
- And1: 20,038
- Joined: Jul 19, 2005
- Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,658
- And1: 3,461
- Joined: Aug 04, 2007
- TMACFORMVP
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 18,947
- And1: 161
- Joined: Jun 30, 2006
- Location: 9th Seed
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,778
- And1: 21
- Joined: Aug 12, 2006
- Location: Rest In Peace Dad
- Contact:
-
- andyhop
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,628
- And1: 1,320
- Joined: May 08, 2007
-
The case for Scola is that he outdoes Horford in pretty much every major advanced multi stat.PER,OWS,DWS,ORtg,DRtg,WS,LS,WSAA.
If you believe in these stats then Scola is the better player quite easily.
I haven't seen either enough to form a personal view ,but was actually surprised that both of their stats weren't better from the way they are talked about.
If you believe in these stats then Scola is the better player quite easily.
I haven't seen either enough to form a personal view ,but was actually surprised that both of their stats weren't better from the way they are talked about.
"Football is not a matter of life and death...it's much more important than that."- Bill Shankley
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,837
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 24, 2007
andyhop wrote:The case for Scola is that he outdoes Horford in pretty much every major advanced multi stat.PER,OWS,DWS,ORtg,DRtg,WS,LS,WSAA.
If you believe in these stats then Scola is the better player quite easily.
I haven't seen either enough to form a personal view ,but was actually surprised that both of their stats weren't better from the way they are talked about.
Hard to compare based on those types of stats when they play different minutes. Scola is at 24.4 and Horford is at 31.4, those 7 minutes mean that Scola can play his game (based on toughness and energy) and not worry about foul trouble (he is fairly foul prone, as is Horford) which allows him to get to the line at a higher rate and means that he is going to be in the lineup when the team needs his offense so he is going to be featured more.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,424
- And1: 2,487
- Joined: Sep 01, 2003
How is Horford clearly better now? He has a lower PER than Scola. Scola has a better post game. He has a better jump shot. Horford the better rebounder. Really Scola looks under utilized. I almost say that on most teams he get used more and get a shot to put up numbers compariable to Gasol. Scola is probably the prime reason that Houston is in the position there in. Scola was one of the best international players in the world for a reason.
"Talent is God-given. Be humble. Fame is man-given. Be grateful. Conceit is self-given. Be careful." John Wooden