trade idea from cavs fan
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
trade idea from cavs fan
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 8
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 06, 2008
trade idea from cavs fan
would u do a deal that involves redd, dan gad for anderson varejeo, sasha pavlovic, and wally szerbiack. u get a huge expiring in wally(13 mil) and 2 young players with 2 more years left on there contract. would u do that. also what do u think would be a deal u would do with the cavs that lands the cavs redd.
- Kerb Hohl
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,504
- And1: 4,432
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
- Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,688
- And1: 27,270
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
CharlosVllnueva wrote:Done deal.
Do you guys find some kind of difference in winning on average 30-35 games/year with no shot at a future or would you like to try and clear the team cancer(yes, team cancer) Max Redd and maybe have another *gasp* 25 win season and then a shot to reubild?
As much as I want him traded Redd has more value expirings and a glorified Dan Gadzuric.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,135
- And1: 2,283
- Joined: Mar 03, 2006
-
midranger wrote:To get Redd, start with Varejao and your first, send back expirings for atleast one (preferably both) of Simmons and/or Gadz.
We are actually on the same page....I would feel better about the deal if Varejao was more than a hustler...not a great shot blocker or defender and the draft pick isn't that good......even if Wally Z's contract is expiring I can't see Hammonds or Skiles liking him.
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,688
- And1: 27,270
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
CharlosVllnueva wrote:Alright, a few questions, then.
1. Do you think Max should be dealt?
2. If so, give me a better, realistic deal.
twirlz wrote:As much as I want him traded
Ahem, I believe I addressed this already.

As for the second question. I have no idea what a better, realistic deal would be. I do know that if we're trading Redd for just expirings then we better be sending Simmons, Gadz or Bell with him.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,688
- And1: 27,270
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
CharlosVllnueva wrote:The guy originally proposed we send Gadz out with him. That is part of the reason I liked the deal.
I'm just not a fan of anything we get back though. I'd rather look for talent in return first and then if we can't do that do the expirings/they take on our crappy contracts.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,135
- And1: 2,283
- Joined: Mar 03, 2006
-
trwi7 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I'm just not a fan of anything we get back though. I'd rather look for talent in return first and then if we can't do that do the expirings/they take on our crappy contracts.
I agree, the ideal scenario would be to get at least 2-3 teams interested and let the bidding begin......this is where we see how shrewd Hammonds is.
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 7,978
- And1: 1
- Joined: Oct 13, 2004
- paulpressey25
- Senior Mod - Bucks
- Posts: 62,523
- And1: 29,525
- Joined: Oct 27, 2002
-
- paulpressey25
- Senior Mod - Bucks
- Posts: 62,523
- And1: 29,525
- Joined: Oct 27, 2002
-
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 7,978
- And1: 1
- Joined: Oct 13, 2004