ImageImage

Bucks Final Team Report (Yahoo)

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,752
And1: 6,957
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Bucks Final Team Report (Yahoo) 

Post#1 » by LUKE23 » Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:56 pm

User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#2 » by europa » Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:59 pm

Pretty damn good writeup in my opinion.
Nothing will not break me.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,752
And1: 6,957
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

 

Post#3 » by LUKE23 » Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:03 pm

Yeah, I can't disagree with much. I disagree that Mo was our most disappointing player, I'd have to go probably Villanueva there. Mo definitely has his weaknesses at PG, but he still scored consistently throughout the year and shot good %'s from all three spots.

What I do think goes down is we look to move Mo and CV for a legit starting small forward, someone clearly better than Simmons/Mason, then we draft someone who can defend in the backcourt, a la Westbrook. Draft an athletic, offensively challenged PF in the second round that can defend.
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#4 » by europa » Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:07 pm

I'd pick Mo over Villanueva mainly because I didn't expect much from Villanueva to begin with. While I have my issues with Mo as the starting PG on this team I do believe he's a better player than Villanueva. The issues Mo had on the court weren't a surprise unfortunately but the issues he had in the locker room (which Yahoo didn't shy away from pointing out) were a major surprise to me. I never expected Mo to turn into a complete a*****e who alienated many of his teammates and caused so many problems in the locker room. Villanueva had his issues in the locker room too, but nobody had them to the extent Mo did. So that gives him the honor of being the most disappointing in my opinion. Way to go, Mo.
Nothing will not break me.
User avatar
DanoMac
RealGM
Posts: 10,026
And1: 4,122
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
     

 

Post#5 » by DanoMac » Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:09 pm

Good write up. I think he hit it dead on. Any other reporter would've simply looked at Mo Williams' stats and say that he's an improving young PG who's showing good potential. This tells the whole story, and I'm glad to see that we're going to be going through a major overhaul.
User avatar
IrishRainbow
Veteran
Posts: 2,853
And1: 928
Joined: Oct 24, 2006
Location: @ the drawing table
     

 

Post#6 » by IrishRainbow » Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:10 pm

LUKE23 wrote: Draft an athletic, offensively challenged PF in the second round that can defend.


You're gonna target someone that is challenged?





Just given ya grief. I know what you're saying...Dorsey?

:lol:
User avatar
gobbler
Junior
Posts: 252
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 07, 2006

 

Post#7 » by gobbler » Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:12 pm

europa wrote:I'd pick Mo over Villanueva mainly because I didn't expect much from Villanueva to begin with. While I have my issues with Mo as the starting PG on this team I do believe he's a better player than Villanueva. The issues Mo had on the court weren't a surprise unfortunately but the issues he had in the locker room (which Yahoo didn't shy away from pointing out) were a major surprise to me. I never expected Mo to turn into a complete a*****e who alienated many of his teammates and caused so many problems in the locker room. Villanueva had his issues in the locker room too, but nobody had them to the extent Mo did. So that gives him the honor of being the most disappointing in my opinion. Way to go, Mo.


It is always a sign of a great team when you have more than one serious contender for the player who was biggest the disappointment - and your underwhelming lotto pick wasn't one of them.
lawry beard wrote:Does anyone else find it ironic that the only player in the NBA the bucks can shut down is Bogut?
User avatar
gobbler
Junior
Posts: 252
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 07, 2006

 

Post#8 » by gobbler » Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:17 pm

DTribbs wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

You're gonna target someone that is challenged?

Just given ya grief. I know what you're saying...Dorsey?

:lol:



The Bucks are kind of like the special Olympics. Plus I'm sure Gadz could use a buddy. They could attend Disney movies together and color in the characters in their books afterwards.
lawry beard wrote:Does anyone else find it ironic that the only player in the NBA the bucks can shut down is Bogut?
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,752
And1: 6,957
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

 

Post#9 » by LUKE23 » Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:19 pm

europa wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Yea you can definitely make a strong argument that Yi was deserving of this "honor" too. Watching Carl Landry make so many huge plays for the Rockets last night - including the biggest play of the game at the end - only served to reinforce what a poor rookie season Yi had and how far away from being an impact player he is.


I don't see how Landry playing well reinforces that Yi was a disappointment. Yi showed enough in the first half of the season to make me optimistic. If he hadn't showed anything or any skills all year I would have been a lot more worried.

But I don't think we should turn this into a Yi thread.
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#10 » by europa » Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:20 pm

gobbler wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



It is always a sign of a great team when you have more than one serious contender for the player who was biggest the disappointment - and your underwhelming lotto pick wasn't one of them.


Yea you can definitely make a strong argument that Yi was deserving of this "honor" too. Watching Carl Landry make so many huge plays for the Rockets last night - including the biggest play of the game at the end - only served to reinforce what a poor rookie season Yi had and how far away from being an impact player he is.
Nothing will not break me.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,752
And1: 6,957
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

 

Post#11 » by LUKE23 » Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:25 pm

Looking at the Hawks roster, they are at $51M committed currently and they need to re-sign Josh Smith, which I'm sure they will make a priority. Given their roster makeup, I think it's pretty reasonable to say that Marvin Williams might be available.

Anyone think they would consider a Mo/CV for Marvin/Claxton deal?

They do only have one more year of Bibby and Mo kind of fits their up and down style of play.
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

 

Post#12 » by xTitan » Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:53 pm

Wow! A reporter who actually did his homework...refreshing to see every now and again.

One more thing, and I will be bringing this up way to much......when making trade predictions, everyone needs to remember that this is now Hammonds/Skiles and not Harris/whatever junior coach.....Hammonds and Skiles have a "type" of player they like...so guys with low IQ's, no defensive abilities. poor size .......more than likely won't be coming in.
showtimesam
Veteran
Posts: 2,760
And1: 43
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: Wisconsin

 

Post#13 » by showtimesam » Fri Apr 25, 2008 3:14 pm

Very good report.

I agree with Mo as the most dissapointing. Entering the season with the contract he had it was clear we needed him to be a strong leader at the pg spot. But with his lack of defense and inability to set the table for others it was clear he was the wrong man for the job.

The behind the scenes stuff just adds insult to injury.
Zeus LA
Junior
Posts: 293
And1: 118
Joined: Aug 03, 2006
Location: Basketball Pergatory

 

Post#14 » by Zeus LA » Fri Apr 25, 2008 3:17 pm

LUKE23 wrote:Looking at the Hawks roster, they are at $51M committed currently and they need to re-sign Josh Smith, which I'm sure they will make a priority. Given their roster makeup, I think it's pretty reasonable to say that Marvin Williams might be available.

Anyone think they would consider a Mo/CV for Marvin/Claxton deal?

They do only have one more year of Bibby and Mo kind of fits their up and down style of play.


I said this in another thread but I think Marvin and CV are about a wash at this stage. CV's much more gifted offensively, while Marvin is somewhat better defensively (still sub par).
And now it's over to...Moira
miggs0721
Freshman
Posts: 85
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 03, 2007

 

Post#15 » by miggs0721 » Fri Apr 25, 2008 3:21 pm

Just Bring in Kelvin and I'll be one happy s.o.b going into the draft
User avatar
Sigra
RealGM
Posts: 15,401
And1: 1,446
Joined: Sep 08, 2005
Location: Aug 02, 2002
     

 

Post#16 » by Sigra » Fri Apr 25, 2008 4:08 pm

No Mo fans in this thread?
User avatar
Jez2983
RealGM
Posts: 18,094
And1: 8,193
Joined: Dec 10, 2006
Location: #team56.4%eFG
   

 

Post#17 » by Jez2983 » Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:25 am

Good report. I think the difficulty with the 'least valuable player' was that everyone outside the main three was inconsistent. CV, Yi put in good performances irregularly, and Sessions didn't get any consistent time till the end of the season. I just feel there was very rarely 4 or even 3 good performances together, and then a couple of complimetary performances (like a couple of key 3-pointers, a couple of good stops)in a game together. But then, it's well-documented how dysfunctional this team was.
trwi7 wrote:Will be practicing my best Australian accent for tomorrow.

"Hey ya wankers. I graduated from Aranmore back in 2010 and lost me yearbook. Is there any way you didgeridoos can send anotha yearbook me way?"
User avatar
Buck You
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,555
And1: 541
Joined: Jul 24, 2006
Location: Illinois
     

 

Post#18 » by Buck You » Sun Apr 27, 2008 6:46 pm

I definitley think Mo was our most dissapointing player. He didn't really improve from last year(actually he digressed) and I thought he was very selfish a lot of times this season. Villanueva was also extremly selfish, especially later in the year. All he did was jack up shots and I think his scoring averages towards the end of the year are a little bit bloated.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,688
And1: 27,270
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#19 » by trwi7 » Sun Apr 27, 2008 6:55 pm

ReddBogutCharlieV wrote:He didn't really improve from last year(actually he digressed)


Go back to school, Einstein. :lol:
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
Nowak008
RealGM
Posts: 14,588
And1: 4,303
Joined: Jul 07, 2006
Location: Book Publisher
Contact:

 

Post#20 » by Nowak008 » Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:03 pm

Sigra wrote:No Mo fans in this thread?


:wave:

I think the article was pretty much spot on, obviously I disagree with Mo being the most disappointing this year. Mo was indisputably our 3rd best (I would say 2nd) best player this year and coming into the season that is what we thought he would be.

I would have thought Europa would have chosen Bobby considering he thought he was the 2nd best offensive player on the team. Instead he decided to rip Mo some more. O well.

My disappointments would be:

1)Bobby
2)Yi
3)CV
4)Redd
5)Mo
Image
John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters


THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks