Schultz plans to sue Bennett to get Sonics back!

The place to discuss the history of Seattle Supersonics Basketball.

Moderator: Cactus Jack

User avatar
wiff
Head Coach
Posts: 6,887
And1: 21
Joined: Jul 22, 2006
Location: Gettin da boot!

 

Post#141 » by wiff » Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:49 pm

Ex-hippie wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I continue to believe that this statement was sarcastic. Even Bennett isn't stupid enough to admit explicitly that he's trying to make it difficult.


Hmm that's an interesting point there Ex. I haven't thought of it like that. But to be honest I think Bennett is dumb enough to write that. I have a feeling he thought he was going to Waltz out of Seattle with out much of a fight and had no idea that his emails could be recalled.

But if it was sarcastic........damn.
pr0wler
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,240
And1: 3,367
Joined: Jun 04, 2007
     

 

Post#142 » by pr0wler » Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:05 pm

Ex-hippie wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I continue to believe that this statement was sarcastic. Even Bennett isn't stupid enough to admit explicitly that he's trying to make it difficult.


I don't think it was sarcastic at all. Clay Bennett is a dumbass hick who tried to make us believe that his 'man possessed' statement referred to wanting to stay in Seattle. Yea right.
Bulltalk
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,842
And1: 9,277
Joined: Jun 25, 2002
Location: Seattle Area
       

 

Post#143 » by Bulltalk » Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:16 pm

As an aside to this thread, I wonder if this will be the beginning and the end of David Stern's tenure as commissioner of the league, when all is said and done about this? This could turn out to be a major PR boondoggle for the commissioner, owners, and the league. Maybe not. But maybe so.
"I'm a truth teller. All I do is tell the truth."

(Donald Trump - 8/11/16)
User avatar
D5150
Starter
Posts: 2,217
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 27, 2007
Location: EARTH

 

Post#144 » by D5150 » Sat Apr 26, 2008 7:56 pm

taken in context i am leaning towards believing the "most difficult" statement was sarcastic in nature. however, considering some of the other statements and the fact that he really didn't do a whole lot to try and keep the team here AND he was actively making arangements to move the team while still in the 12 month "good faith" window, i feel this statement could still hurt him.

people on both sides will try and spin the piss out of everything in this case. but when you look at it as a whole, especially the chronology, i really would rather have the city's or howards case than try and defend bennett.

and bennett is not stupid. arrogant? yes. careless with e-mails? yep. a total lying prick? check. but he isn't some redneck rube.
Don't act like you're not impressed.
User avatar
Troy McClure
Banned User
Posts: 4,415
And1: 46
Joined: Aug 16, 2004
Location: Springfield

 

Post#145 » by Troy McClure » Sat Apr 26, 2008 9:34 pm

D5150 wrote:and bennett is not stupid. arrogant? yes. careless with e-mails? yep. a total lying prick? check. but he isn't some redneck rube.


I agree. If he were some rube with no sense how'd he get enough money to buy a team in the first place?
User avatar
elbowthrower
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,788
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 06, 2006

 

Post#146 » by elbowthrower » Sat Apr 26, 2008 11:35 pm

It would be a huge mistake to underestimate the opponent here.
colombianbrew
Senior
Posts: 656
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 14, 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC

 

Post#147 » by colombianbrew » Sun Apr 27, 2008 12:15 am

especially in the Schultz case, we're watching two very rich men fight it out in court. In other words, highly paid, very intelligent lawyers will be the order of the day.
jenn_gp
Head Coach
Posts: 6,629
And1: 6
Joined: Apr 11, 2003

 

Post#148 » by jenn_gp » Sun Apr 27, 2008 6:45 pm

For the "difficult" statement Bennett wrote, I think what sucks about it is that it is written in an e-mail. We don't know the exact tone or context in which it was written.

As a teacher, that's one thing I absolutely hate when it comes to communicating with parents...never discuss issues over e-mail simply because the expected tone with which you write can never be understood by the person who is reading the letter. Some parents make me so upset when they have issues and choose to discuss it through e-mail instead of over the phone or in person.

I don't think you can assume anything with Bennett's words. That's simply what they are...words. How can you assume he's being sarcastic? This is the same man who tried getting people to believe his "man possessed" comment was written about keeping the team in Seattle.

I'd take what he said as words...it's fairly obvious he didn't make his best effort on an arena deal..which in turn made it "difficult" on our end on getting something done to keep the team here. IMO he did exactly what he wrote with that statement.
DoctorEvil
Sophomore
Posts: 114
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 04, 2007

 

Post#149 » by DoctorEvil » Thu May 8, 2008 3:46 am

Troy McClure wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Let's wait a couple more months. I'm sure the people on the OJ case thought that they won....more than a couple times.

I just remembered what I really wanted my S/n to be: "OJ did it".


That reminds me that I figured out the real title of O.J.'s new book (I think they actually picked an inferior title)
"Here's How I Should Have Done It!"
jenn_gp
Head Coach
Posts: 6,629
And1: 6
Joined: Apr 11, 2003

 

Post#150 » by jenn_gp » Thu May 8, 2008 1:13 pm

Isn't that really similar to what he said he wanted the title to be?

"I Didn't Do It, but Here's How I Would Have Done It"

I can't remember exactly word for word what he was thinking.
DoctorEvil
Sophomore
Posts: 114
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 04, 2007

 

Post#151 » by DoctorEvil » Thu May 8, 2008 6:26 pm

Yes, similar. But my suggestion implies he DID do it, but SHOULD have done a few things differently. Subtle difference-- and funnier, I think...
Ex-hippie
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,213
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 17, 2003

 

Post#152 » by Ex-hippie » Fri May 9, 2008 5:10 pm

Troy McClure wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I agree. If he were some rube with no sense how'd he get enough money to buy a team in the first place?


By marrying into it.
User avatar
elbowthrower
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,788
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 06, 2006

 

Post#153 » by elbowthrower » Fri May 9, 2008 5:38 pm

Typically, you don't marry into a wealthy family like that if you're not already in the same social/financial orbit. So I would bet he was not born in a trailer park and guarantee you he's not an idiot.

Part of the reason we're in the mess we're in now is that people underestimated him.

Return to Seattle Supersonics Basketball