ImageImageImage

Who are the Bulls going to take with the number one

Moderators: KingDavid, BFRESH44, MettaWorldPanda, Wiltside, heat4life, QUIZ, IggieCC

theFRANCHISE
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,729
And1: 354
Joined: Dec 30, 2005
Location: Los Angeles
       

 

Post#41 » by theFRANCHISE » Wed May 21, 2008 5:25 am

I say the bulls will take beasley, they been looking for a low post presence for the longest time.

I hope the bulls get ROSE, I can't count how many times I threw my remote control after dwade would take the ball up court and it turned into a turnover
"You could call it with braille!" - Chick Hearn
girlygirl
RealGM
Posts: 17,563
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 07, 2004

 

Post#42 » by girlygirl » Wed May 21, 2008 5:41 am

If you go to the Bulls board, you'd see the majority of the posters want Derrick Rose. Most of them would probably be fine if they ended up taking Beasley (although a few have threatened to stop following the team if that happens)

I think they will end up taking Rose and will then trade either Hinrich or Gordon (latter would have to be S&T since he's a RFA)
mitchco
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,661
And1: 71
Joined: Mar 08, 2005

 

Post#43 » by mitchco » Wed May 21, 2008 5:46 am

It would be badd ass if we could get Hinrich. I mean, he's no John Stockton but.....
GameTime_3
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,480
And1: 4,051
Joined: Sep 20, 2004
Location: Earth
Contact:

 

Post#44 » by GameTime_3 » Wed May 21, 2008 5:49 am

Chicago Should Take Beasley but will take Rose. They will move hinrich and get no value.
HitMan52
Starter
Posts: 2,071
And1: 33
Joined: Jun 26, 2006
Location: 7th Banner to Chicago

 

Post#45 » by HitMan52 » Wed May 21, 2008 7:19 am

its game time wrote:Chicago Should Take Beasley but will take Rose. They will move hinrich and get no value.


Rose is just as good of fit in Chicago than Beasley and probably more because PG is a much more valuable position and we jsut spent a #2 on a PF with good potential and a #9 on a PF/C who is also showing good potential.
User avatar
BigBallingMIA
Starter
Posts: 2,313
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 14, 2006
Location: b-EAZY

 

Post#46 » by BigBallingMIA » Wed May 21, 2008 7:19 am

Flash4thewin wrote:Even if we got the # 1 pick we wouldnt know who Pat wanted because he would never "leak" out that info. Remember all the love the team had for Kaman and we picked Wade. Pat is as sly as the come and if anything is "leaked" its misinformation.

2 words, Maciej Lampe

:lol:
User avatar
HPS
Veteran
Posts: 2,525
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 03, 2001

 

Post#47 » by HPS » Wed May 21, 2008 7:43 am

This is why the Bulls won't take Beasley...it's from the DraftExpress Beasely profile and goes against everyone Paxson looks for:

From DraftExpress in the Beasley profile:

Defensively, there is absolutely no way around the fact that Beasley has looked awful so far--not really a surprise considering his reputation coming into college. Even when he tries to put in a legit effort, he looks unfocused--almost completely lost-- constantly out of position, and too often caught with his hand in the cookie jar gambling for steals. He doesn
User avatar
Tommy Udo 6
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 42,507
And1: 28
Joined: Jun 13, 2003
Location: San Francisco/East Bay CA

 

Post#48 » by Tommy Udo 6 » Wed May 21, 2008 10:12 am

Deng needs a decent PG to create for him

Someone like Rose is essential to having an efficient Deng

Paul & Deron have helped their teams tremendously

Good PG dont come that often

Bulls should take Rose & move Kirk to SG
The gem cannot be polished without friction, nor man perfected without trials.
- -- Chinese proverb
BBallFreak
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,529
And1: 18,776
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
   

 

Post#49 » by BBallFreak » Wed May 21, 2008 10:34 am

You guys go for Rose. We'll happily take Beasley :cheesygrin:
User avatar
JoeHova
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,382
And1: 61
Joined: Feb 26, 2004
Location: "There is hope, but not for us." -F.K.

 

Post#50 » by JoeHova » Wed May 21, 2008 10:50 am

#2 is in some ways and some years the best pick. Obviously it's not the best pick in years like 2003, 1997, 1992, etc., but otherwise it can be good because then the team doing the drafting doesn't have to worry about everyone talking about how stupid they were to take _____ over ______. As someone from Milwaukee, I've seen that first hand with Bogut (vs. Paul and Williams) and Big Dog (vs. Kidd and Hill).

As long as there are a few players on a similar level, #2 works well. PF & PG are big needs for the Heat, so this should work well for them either way. I was hoping for Rose because that's who Wade wants, but who knows if he would make a good GM at this point in his career.
"Look, if he sees me on his lawn waving a gun around, he's gonna pretend not to be home."
BBallFreak
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,529
And1: 18,776
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
   

 

Post#51 » by BBallFreak » Wed May 21, 2008 11:21 am

I don't think Power Forward is a big need for the Heat. We do have Udonis Haslem, and he ain't bad. Don't get me wrong, we could stand an upgrade, but it's not what I'd call a big need - not when we have Mark Blount starting at center...
User avatar
Hoops23
General Manager
Posts: 8,845
And1: 1,301
Joined: Jan 15, 2003
Location: City of Angels
   

 

Post#52 » by Hoops23 » Wed May 21, 2008 12:43 pm

I agree that PF is not a big need for the heat but still you cannot pass on Beasley. I do not know what is with Udonis to think that we will not draft Beasley considering we already have him. If we draft Beasley, use him as what was Walker then with us or trade haslem for a need position then use the MLE for the other need.
Cliff Levingston
RealGM
Posts: 22,667
And1: 1,094
Joined: May 29, 2003
Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
       

 

Post#53 » by Cliff Levingston » Wed May 21, 2008 2:24 pm

DBurks2818 wrote:Wait, you mean they should go with Rose, right?

Haha. Yea, Cliff Levingston's bad. It's edited now.

Either way, you can't go wrong. However, since the PG is in a much better position to really impact the game, Cliff Levingston would go with Rose. It even makes more sense when you look at the rest of the Bulls roster, most of which needs someone else to create looks for them. Beasley would take the shots while everyone else basically stands around, whereas Rose has a much better chance of helping guys like Thomas, Sefolosha and Deng generate more points than they usually would.

Beasley will be a nice fit and a great addition to the Heat though. Trade Haslem for a better point guard that can take care of the ball and get it to Wade/Beasley and things are looking mighty fine with a Wade/Beasley/Marion trio.
The Diesel
Veteran
Posts: 2,711
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 07, 2005

 

Post#54 » by The Diesel » Wed May 21, 2008 3:04 pm

Chad Ford said today that Beasley is the favorite to go # 1 to Chicago.

And I disagree that the Heat don't need Beasley.

Move Haslem to C, play Marion at PF, play Beasley at SF, Wade at SG, and get a new PG and this is a really good team.

Haslem has the toughness to play C.
User avatar
Flash4thewin
RealGM
Posts: 13,455
And1: 9,748
Joined: Jan 27, 2006

 

Post#55 » by Flash4thewin » Wed May 21, 2008 3:23 pm

The problem is that line up are that Beasley is a pf not a sf and we would be ridiculously undersized in all starting positions except pf. Can Marion play as effective at sf like he does at pf?

pg-?
sg-Wade 6'4
sf-Marion 6'6
pf- Beasley (6'9 or 6'10)
c- UD 6'8
User avatar
hksazn
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,514
And1: 37
Joined: Jun 13, 2006
Location: Toronto
Contact:

 

Post#56 » by hksazn » Wed May 21, 2008 4:07 pm

DanDanE420 wrote:Great post, CB4.

There are two things Marion can't do: create facing the basket and score in the post. Beasley does both of these things exceptionally well. Wade and a new PG (TJ Ford?) would have three forwards that play hard, catch the ball and finish.


Ford is a 8mil/year contract who did you have in mind?
User avatar
heat4life
Forum Mod - Heat
Forum Mod - Heat
Posts: 13,870
And1: 6,363
Joined: Jun 28, 2001
Location: THREE-OH-FIVE - VICE CITY
         

 

Post#57 » by heat4life » Wed May 21, 2008 4:19 pm

Cliff Levingston wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


Haha. Yea, Cliff Levingston's bad. It's edited now.

Either way, you can't go wrong. However, since the PG is in a much better position to really impact the game, Cliff Levingston would go with Rose. It even makes more sense when you look at the rest of the Bulls roster, most of which needs someone else to create looks for them. Beasley would take the shots while everyone else basically stands around, whereas Rose has a much better chance of helping guys like Thomas, Sefolosha and Deng generate more points than they usually would.

Beasley will be a nice fit and a great addition to the Heat though. Trade Haslem for a better point guard that can take care of the ball and get it to Wade/Beasley and things are looking mighty fine with a Wade/Beasley/Marion trio.


Reading your posts alwys freaked me out. Do you ever slip and don't refer yourself as the 3rd person? Just curious.. :D
Image
ROAD TO THE CHAMPIONSHIP
kyphi
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 79,750
And1: 17,630
Joined: Jul 17, 2004
Location: america's bellybutton
Contact:

 

Post#58 » by kyphi » Wed May 21, 2008 4:19 pm

please, no TJ Ford
jax98
RealGM
Posts: 36,697
And1: 3,015
Joined: Aug 31, 2003

 

Post#59 » by jax98 » Wed May 21, 2008 4:24 pm

He doesn't.. Cliff Levingston is always consistant.
User avatar
heat4life
Forum Mod - Heat
Forum Mod - Heat
Posts: 13,870
And1: 6,363
Joined: Jun 28, 2001
Location: THREE-OH-FIVE - VICE CITY
         

 

Post#60 » by heat4life » Wed May 21, 2008 4:39 pm

IMO Chicago takes Rose and changes their team by riding themselves from Hinrich and moving Gordon to the bench (if he agrees to a reasonable contract).
Image
ROAD TO THE CHAMPIONSHIP

Return to Miami Heat