
Popovic is the best coach in the last 25 years.
Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
- TonyMontana
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,726
- And1: 398
- Joined: Apr 27, 2006
- Location: Loungin in the Cali sun.
-
- TommyTheCat
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,311
- And1: 8
- Joined: Jun 07, 2005
- Location: oregon
- Kid Vicious
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,740
- And1: 478
- Joined: Jan 28, 2006
- Location: West Coast
9 rings > 4 rings.
Really, the discussion ends right there.
And if some people argue that Phil only coaches teams with great players, what about Pop?
This guy is the biggest rat ever.
The year the Spurs were horrible, and David Robinson was injured, they got off to a horrible start. So then Pop, as the GM, fires his coach THE DAY ROBINSON IS SET TO COME BACK.
He was basically setting himself up to be a hero, and lead a turnaround.
Give me a break. Pop is fit to shine Phil's shoes. That's about it.
Really, the discussion ends right there.
And if some people argue that Phil only coaches teams with great players, what about Pop?
This guy is the biggest rat ever.
The year the Spurs were horrible, and David Robinson was injured, they got off to a horrible start. So then Pop, as the GM, fires his coach THE DAY ROBINSON IS SET TO COME BACK.
He was basically setting himself up to be a hero, and lead a turnaround.
Give me a break. Pop is fit to shine Phil's shoes. That's about it.
-
- Junior
- Posts: 417
- And1: 5
- Joined: May 13, 2006
Could Pop massage the egos of a Kobe-Shaq duo for 5 years?
Has Pop ever swept a Phil Jackson-coached team in a playoff series?
Don't give me this crap about Pop never having the greatest players on his roster. Hasn't Tim Duncan been a perennial great this decade?
Lakers won in 5. Put this argument to rest. Phil has 9 rings.
Has Pop ever swept a Phil Jackson-coached team in a playoff series?
Don't give me this crap about Pop never having the greatest players on his roster. Hasn't Tim Duncan been a perennial great this decade?
Lakers won in 5. Put this argument to rest. Phil has 9 rings.
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,658
- And1: 16
- Joined: Dec 22, 2006
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,467
- And1: 63
- Joined: Oct 07, 2007
- Location: Floor seats next to Jack
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,150
- And1: 5
- Joined: Aug 19, 2007
If that was true then he wouldn't have gotten owned by Phil 4 of the 5 times he has faced him this decade.
Phil's the GCOAT. He's got the best combination of tactical knowledge + application of it on both ends of the floor to go along with mentally preparing his players for every situation they're about to face. You look at the SA/LA series...and you can see just how far ahead LA is mentally compared to SA. That's all coaching. Don't give me this BS about how Phil has had the best players. So did Pop, Riley, Tomjanovich, Auerbach and every other coach who won a lot of rings. Yet none of them are as successful as Phil.
Phil's the GCOAT. He's got the best combination of tactical knowledge + application of it on both ends of the floor to go along with mentally preparing his players for every situation they're about to face. You look at the SA/LA series...and you can see just how far ahead LA is mentally compared to SA. That's all coaching. Don't give me this BS about how Phil has had the best players. So did Pop, Riley, Tomjanovich, Auerbach and every other coach who won a lot of rings. Yet none of them are as successful as Phil.