All Trades Post Here
- GrizzledGrizzFan
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,571
- And1: 161
- Joined: Jul 29, 2005
- Location: Just south of Memphis, as the crow flies...
-
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,453
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 17, 2006
- Location: New York City
grizzleGM wrote:The only deal that crosses my mind to get MMiller to NY is the following:
MMiller, Collins, Cardinal, #28
for
Curry, Jeffries, Crawford, #6
Memphis helps NY rid itself of two of their contracts that extend past 2010.
Or...
MMiller, Cardinal, Collins
for
Randolph, Crawford, #6
`
Um, your bugging like the dumb ass knick fan that posted that first trade. This deal does not go down. IF that 6th pick is included, prepare to add one of your pg's or warrick to this deal and it may be considered. We aint handing lotto picks away

Re: Mike Miller trade proposal
-
- Freshman
- Posts: 51
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 15, 2007
Re: Mike Miller trade proposal
NYKH20 wrote:Would you guys do Malik Rose's expiring contract along with Mardy Collins for Mike Miller.
Or since you're under the cap, how about Miller and Cardinal for Rose and Collins.
What would you want for Mike Miller
Certainly not that deal.
-
- Freshman
- Posts: 51
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 15, 2007
grizzleGM wrote:The only deal that crosses my mind to get MMiller to NY is the following:
MMiller, Collins, Cardinal, #28
for
Curry, Jeffries, Crawford, #6
Memphis helps NY rid itself of two of their contracts that extend past 2010.
Or...
MMiller, Cardinal, Collins
for
Randolph, Crawford, #6
No one is giving up their lottery pick and their best player to get Mike Miller.
- GrizzledGrizzFan
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,571
- And1: 161
- Joined: Jul 29, 2005
- Location: Just south of Memphis, as the crow flies...
-
- grizzleGM
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,279
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 04, 2005
LBusiness... please have the decency to clean up that crap before posting it.
But when I waded through it to figure it out, I realized that I was wading through crap.
So Memphis trades three useful players and a lump of crap for two useful players (that play the same position) and two lumps of crap. WOW... sign me up!
But when I waded through it to figure it out, I realized that I was wading through crap.
So Memphis trades three useful players and a lump of crap for two useful players (that play the same position) and two lumps of crap. WOW... sign me up!
-
- Senior
- Posts: 505
- And1: 92
- Joined: Jul 04, 2007
This seems like a pretty lowball counter-offer. I'm not sure how much Memphis values Raef's contract, especially for a good prospect in Conley.
Obviously what Memphis valued was Outlaw, and instead we want them to take Webster? I think if Outlaw is substituted this is probably closer to fair for me personally, but I'm not as attached as a lot of other blazer fans.
Obviously what Memphis valued was Outlaw, and instead we want them to take Webster? I think if Outlaw is substituted this is probably closer to fair for me personally, but I'm not as attached as a lot of other blazer fans.
- 541Blaza
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,883
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 24, 2006
- Location: Oregon
b33nine wrote:This seems like a pretty lowball counter-offer. I'm not sure how much Memphis values Raef's contract, especially for a good prospect in Conley.
Obviously what Memphis valued was Outlaw, and instead we want them to take Webster? I think if Outlaw is substituted this is probably closer to fair for me personally, but I'm not as attached as a lot of other blazer fans.
Brandon Roy personally asked Kevin Pritchard to bring Outlaw back next year. Outlaw has been working out already this off-season, I highly doubt the Blazers trade him. He is close to untouchable right now... that is the power of Roy's opinion.
I judged Memphis value for LaFrentz as about the same as they valued Kwame. Not quite as much since they already got Kwame, but still good cap relief. Webster, Jack, and the 13th have pretty good value too with how deep this draft is, obviously Memphis is eyeing someone around there.

- GrizzledGrizzFan
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,571
- And1: 161
- Joined: Jul 29, 2005
- Location: Just south of Memphis, as the crow flies...
-
-
- Senior
- Posts: 570
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jan 25, 2007
this offer's got no legs. Miller and Conley both have at least some value as trade chips beyond just getting rid of Cardinal (as evidenced by the fact that the Grizzlies didn't trade Cardinal/MM for Tricky Ricky/Jwill at the deadline). Jack is of no use to us really, Webster is nice, #13 is decent...but losing MM and Conley to get expirings, a low lottery pick, and Webster is just not enough.