ImageImage

How would this look

Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver

tbhawksfan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,682
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 21, 2006

How would this look 

Post#1 » by tbhawksfan » Sat May 31, 2008 8:09 pm

From trade board



How about something like this:

Bucks Get: Bibby/Future Minn First (Top 10 Protected until 2012)
Bucks Give: Mo Williams/Gadzuric/#8

Clippers Get: JJ/Gadzuric
Clippers Give: Kaman/Mobley/Knight/Future Minn First

Hawks Get: Kaman/Mobley/Mo Williams/Knight/#8
Hawks Give: JJ/Bibby

Mo / Law / Knight

Chil / Mobley / Rio

Smoove / Marvin / Richardson

Horford / Andersen / Jones

Kaman / Zaza

Plus the #8; BPA.
CWell
Junior
Posts: 374
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Location: College Park,GA

 

Post#2 » by CWell » Sat May 31, 2008 8:29 pm

hell no.It looks horrible and with Woody it's a lock to be in the lottery.
User avatar
ATLfan
Junior
Posts: 488
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 12, 2007
Location: Shocking the World!!!

 

Post#3 » by ATLfan » Sat May 31, 2008 8:49 pm

No
tbhawksfan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,682
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 21, 2006

 

Post#4 » by tbhawksfan » Sat May 31, 2008 10:02 pm

Looking for a C, this gets it done. We lose our best player (for now, Smoove is looking real good) and Bibby is an asset, but I think that team plus a mid lottery is looking really good for a long time.

We go physical BIG or SG with the #8 and this team is two deep at every position. Look at the second team.

I just don't see a weekness on this team. I'd miss JJ, but I think winning would help me get over it.
CWell
Junior
Posts: 374
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Location: College Park,GA

 

Post#5 » by CWell » Sat May 31, 2008 10:51 pm

tbhawksfan wrote:Looking for a C, this gets it done. We lose our best player (for now, Smoove is looking real good) and Bibby is an asset, but I think that team plus a mid lottery is looking really good for a long time.

We go physical BIG or SG with the #8 and this team is two deep at every position. Look at the second team.

I just don't see a weekness on this team. I'd miss JJ, but I think winning would help me get over it.
lol there are more weaknessess than before.That's not a winning team,especially with this dumazz coach we have.
User avatar
JoshB914
Head Coach
Posts: 6,889
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 16, 2006

 

Post#6 » by JoshB914 » Sat May 31, 2008 11:03 pm

I don't get why everyone wants to shake up our starting lineup. Our first five is a 45 win team next year if we add a little depth (not too much to ask). If the deal doesn't involve Bibby/Chillz or Marvin for a big time player then we need to stick with what we have.
User avatar
Hawk4Playoffs
Sophomore
Posts: 236
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 16, 2006

 

Post#7 » by Hawk4Playoffs » Sat May 31, 2008 11:17 pm

no way
Skyhawk1
Starter
Posts: 2,106
And1: 102
Joined: Oct 06, 2005
Location: Atlanta

 

Post#8 » by Skyhawk1 » Sat May 31, 2008 11:53 pm

JoshB914 wrote:I don't get why everyone wants to shake up our starting lineup. Our first five is a 45 win team next year if we add a little depth (not too much to ask). If the deal doesn't involve Bibby/Chillz or Marvin for a big time player then we need to stick with what we have.


Well put.
GO HAWKS.
User avatar
evildallas
General Manager
Posts: 9,412
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Location: in the land of weak ownership
Contact:

 

Post#9 » by evildallas » Sun Jun 1, 2008 5:24 am

Mo Williams is a shoot first PG, Mobley has almost nothing left in the tank. I like Chris Kaman, but he's not been a consistent winner with a more experienced cast around him so I have my doubts of him as a cornerstone. The #8 pick could be good if someone drops, or could be among the highest priced of a set of players with even talent from #6-#20.

I don't understand the desire to send Joe Johnson to the Clippers, but I've seen it in various forms all over the board. As much as Josh Smith showed us a sample of what he could become in the playoff series, so did Joe. I'm interested in seeing if Joe can be the Joe of Game 4 more often. It'd be a big risk to trade him out before seeing if being the man at playoff time has showed him what he has to do to get to another level.

Trading Bibby I understand if we can get the right deal because his contract is expiring, I'm not in favor of a long term extension, and if it expires we get nothing out of him but cap relief. But I still require the right deal not just any deal. Gutting our backcourt and main scoring punch to get a traditional C doesn't make sense to me.
Going to donkey punch a leprechaun!
tbhawksfan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,682
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 21, 2006

 

Post#10 » by tbhawksfan » Sun Jun 1, 2008 4:27 pm

My most realistic and possibly best plan is to simply add Andersen, and a couple FA tweaks.

The Bibby situation will look real good at the trade deadline. We can see if Acie can handle it and get a solid back up and trade him or simply let him expire at season's end.
mattlanta
Senior
Posts: 580
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 05, 2007

 

Post#11 » by mattlanta » Sun Jun 1, 2008 4:33 pm

That would look kinda stupid.
conleyorbust
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,837
And1: 0
Joined: May 24, 2007

 

Post#12 » by conleyorbust » Mon Jun 2, 2008 1:34 pm

You don't trade Johnson or Smith for quantity or decent players. Big step back.
M301E814W404
Junior
Posts: 392
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: How would this look 

Post#13 » by M301E814W404 » Mon Jun 2, 2008 5:28 pm

tbhawksfan wrote:From trade board



How about something like this:

Bucks Get: Bibby/Future Minn First (Top 10 Protected until 2012)
Bucks Give: Mo Williams/Gadzuric/#8

Clippers Get: JJ/Gadzuric
Clippers Give: Kaman/Mobley/Knight/Future Minn First

Hawks Get: Kaman/Mobley/Mo Williams/Knight/#8
Hawks Give: JJ/Bibby

Mo / Law / Knight

Chil / Mobley / Rio

Smoove / Marvin / Richardson

Horford / Andersen / Jones

Kaman / Zaza

Plus the #8; BPA.



Absolutely and utterly (Please Use More Appropriate Word)...end this madness now
User avatar
Retrovision
Pro Prospect
Posts: 932
And1: 1
Joined: May 20, 2007

 

Post#14 » by Retrovision » Tue Jun 3, 2008 12:28 am

wtf HELL NO!

Return to Atlanta Hawks