sully00 wrote:Thanks for proving my point Rondo fan, KG's shooting kept the Lakers in the game in the second half.
He was guarding either Odom or Gasol both were killing us in the first half and both shot over 50% for the game. Some of that was on blown pick and rolls mostly by Posey but all the same it was the defense on Kobe that was the difference and that was Ray, Posey and Pierce.
Like I said I thought KG had a great game and was an even choice with Pierce and I can even see going for PJ. I just think it is crap to feel the need to put Pierce down to justify some other choice, especially after how the night played out, unless your trying to justify something else.
Look, if it was an even game, then why is the board 75% to 25%, PP to KG?
I agree with you that it was even. How I am putting down Paul Pierce by suggesting that? YOU are proving MY point. If anybody suggests on the board that PP is anything less than the sole, main, critical factor in the Celtics' success this season, they immediately get criticized.
Sure, KG shot like crap for a stretch in the second half, but Pierce had a bad first half, and KG showed up big time in the last two minutes of the game, which was the most critical stretch. I'm sorry, but games where you carry a 6-point lead into the last 4 minutes against a team with Kobe Bryant on it were not won in the third quarter.
L.A. went 13 for 39 in the second half, and we killed them on the boards. That's why we won, plain and simple. But this board, as usual, attributes the win to a couple of Pierce three pointers in the third quarter.
I mean, c'mon, objectively, don't you think that's a little ridiculous? Which factor was more important in our win, L.A. going 13-39 or the two Pierce three-pointers? Nobody's talking about our defense, or our rebounding of those L.A. misses. And even if you limit the discussion to scoring, KG comes out ahead.
The board is biased, plain and simple.
I mean, it's not so bad that's it's not worth posting here or anything. It's just a fact.