ImageImageImage

Victory Cigar- Celtics take game 1

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

Who?

Pierce
57
71%
KG
14
18%
Ray Allen
5
6%
Rondo
4
5%
 
Total votes: 80

User avatar
rambo_ortega
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,510
And1: 22
Joined: Jan 22, 2004

 

Post#41 » by rambo_ortega » Fri Jun 6, 2008 2:49 pm

Gomes3PC wrote:Who else but Paul Pierce. He left us for dead in the 1st half, only to completely turn around the game in the 2nd half. It seems more and more that even if KG has a great game we can lose, but if Pierce has a great game we are unstoppable.

Honorable mention to KG and PJ.


it's because kg has been consistently playing very well in the playoffs that's why when p2 or ray are big plus when they explode.
Image
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

 

Post#42 » by MyInsatiableOne » Fri Jun 6, 2008 3:19 pm

I voted Paul, but KG, Ray, Rondo, or PJ could have won it from me, too.
It's still 17 to 11!!!!
User avatar
Rondo_Fan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,954
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 17, 2006

 

Post#43 » by Rondo_Fan » Fri Jun 6, 2008 3:26 pm

RickyDizzle wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Did you really misinterpret his post that bad? The 3 pts he is refering to are not his 3 pt shooting over the course of the game, he was talking about his 3 pt first half. He then goes on to talk about his good second half and how it was needed to win the game.

The 3 threes he made were awesome, but my vote would go to PJ, with KG second and PP third.

I hope he is ready to play sunday...

...but lay off Jammer, what he said made sense. Pierce made some big plays but KG anchored the D had a good overall game despite going cold for that one stretch in the second half.

What PP did in the second half is what KG was doing in the first half when PP had disappeared...its easier to value the second half more since thats what closed out the game, but without KG we wouldnt have been close enough going into the second half for PP to take over.

-Dizzy


I agree with this, but this board is seriously biased towards Pierce.

I understand it, because he's been our guy for so long.

But take last night. KG scored more than Pierce, out-rebounded him, anchored the defense in the middle (which if Pierce has a tough guard everybody starts coming out with excuses for him about how that affects his production on the offensive end), and most importantly, sealed the deal in the last two minutes by not letting anybody in the middle, hitting the boards with the dunk, and making his free throws.

Yet the board is 75% to 25% for Pierce as player of the game, and on top of that they call you a hater if you don't agree with them.

Have people somehow missed the fact that KG has been our top scorer in 16 of our 21 playoff games this year? And he's doing this on top of his defensive and rebounding responsibilities, which are are the greatest on the club. Again, other players (who shall remain nameless) are given a free pass on the offensive end if they have to play defense.

And the board jumps all over you if you don't grab a sponge and start washing Pierce's balls with them.

Unbelievable...

I mean, I love Paul Pierce, he's been without question my favorite player to watch for the past ten years. But I like to think that I can look at his contributions objectively, without turning into a complete fanboy.

OK, down off soapbox.
Image

Yabba-dabba-doo!
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

 

Post#44 » by sully00 » Fri Jun 6, 2008 3:38 pm

RickyDizzle wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Did you really misinterpret his post that bad? The 3 pts he is refering to are not his 3 pt shooting over the course of the game, he was talking about his 3 pt first half. He then goes on to talk about his good second half and how it was needed to win the game.


Yes, yes I did.

...but lay off Jammer, what he said made sense. Pierce made some big plays but KG anchored the D had a good overall game despite going cold for that one stretch in the second half.


See this is were things go silly again and why it can be hard to understand posts. So Paul needs to be held accountable for going 1-3 against the double team in the first half and being foul trouble. But KG goes 3 for 12 in the second half including missing 9 shots in a row and with his only make the emphatic dunk after the first 2 mins of the 3rd quarter and he is the key to Victory.

What PP did in the second half is what KG was doing in the first half when PP had disappeared...its easier to value the second half more since thats what closed out the game, but without KG we wouldnt have been close enough going into the second half for PP to take over.

-Dizzy


C'mon now this is what I am talking about. I am not even hating on KG I said it was a pick'em between him and Pierce but I am sorry he isn't the only guy playing defense out there. I am hating on the double standard Pierce didn't disappear he picked up his 3rd foul on a charge trying to go to the hole. KG was laying bricks from 18 ft the whole 2nd half against a guy he can dominate on the blocks. Paul Pierce goes 3 for 12 in the 2nd half and I am sure we are talking about his defensive effort making up for it.
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

 

Post#45 » by sully00 » Fri Jun 6, 2008 3:55 pm

Thanks for proving my point Rondo fan, KG's shooting kept the Lakers in the game in the second half.

He was guarding either Odom or Gasol both were killing us in the first half and both shot over 50% for the game. Some of that was on blown pick and rolls mostly by Posey but all the same it was the defense on Kobe that was the difference and that was Ray, Posey and Pierce.

Like I said I thought KG had a great game and was an even choice with Pierce and I can even see going for PJ. I just think it is crap to feel the need to put Pierce down to justify some other choice, especially after how the night played out, unless your trying to justify something else.
User avatar
Rondo_Fan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,954
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 17, 2006

 

Post#46 » by Rondo_Fan » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:07 pm

sully00 wrote:Thanks for proving my point Rondo fan, KG's shooting kept the Lakers in the game in the second half.

He was guarding either Odom or Gasol both were killing us in the first half and both shot over 50% for the game. Some of that was on blown pick and rolls mostly by Posey but all the same it was the defense on Kobe that was the difference and that was Ray, Posey and Pierce.

Like I said I thought KG had a great game and was an even choice with Pierce and I can even see going for PJ. I just think it is crap to feel the need to put Pierce down to justify some other choice, especially after how the night played out, unless your trying to justify something else.


Look, if it was an even game, then why is the board 75% to 25%, PP to KG?

I agree with you that it was even. How I am putting down Paul Pierce by suggesting that? YOU are proving MY point. If anybody suggests on the board that PP is anything less than the sole, main, critical factor in the Celtics' success this season, they immediately get criticized.

Sure, KG shot like crap for a stretch in the second half, but Pierce had a bad first half, and KG showed up big time in the last two minutes of the game, which was the most critical stretch. I'm sorry, but games where you carry a 6-point lead into the last 4 minutes against a team with Kobe Bryant on it were not won in the third quarter.

L.A. went 13 for 39 in the second half, and we killed them on the boards. That's why we won, plain and simple. But this board, as usual, attributes the win to a couple of Pierce three pointers in the third quarter.

I mean, c'mon, objectively, don't you think that's a little ridiculous? Which factor was more important in our win, L.A. going 13-39 or the two Pierce three-pointers? Nobody's talking about our defense, or our rebounding of those L.A. misses. And even if you limit the discussion to scoring, KG comes out ahead.

The board is biased, plain and simple.

I mean, it's not so bad that's it's not worth posting here or anything. It's just a fact.
Image



Yabba-dabba-doo!
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

 

Post#47 » by sully00 » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:23 pm

Pierce obviously is getting a ton of votes over the drama but you are dismissing the fact that his scoring was the difference in the second half. Just like it was against CLE in game 7 and just like it was in the 4ht quarter of game 6 against DET. Dude scored 19 points on 6 shots.

His personal 8-2 run at the beggining of the 2nd erased the Laker lead.

He then returns to the game and goes on a 6-0 run that establishes the lead.

Then after KG bricks two chances to put the Lakers away and allowing them back in Pierce hits a jumper to put us up to stay.

There have been plenty of games this season and post season that KG was the guy drilling those shots, but last night it was Pierce.
User avatar
Rondo_Fan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,954
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 17, 2006

 

Post#48 » by Rondo_Fan » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:42 pm

sully00 wrote:Pierce obviously is getting a ton of votes over the drama but you are dismissing the fact that his scoring was the difference in the second half. Just like it was against CLE in game 7 and just like it was in the 4ht quarter of game 6 against DET. Dude scored 19 points on 6 shots.

His personal 8-2 run at the beggining of the 2nd erased the Laker lead.

He then returns to the game and goes on a 6-0 run that establishes the lead.

Then after KG bricks two chances to put the Lakers away and allowing them back in Pierce hits a jumper to put us up to stay.

There have been plenty of games this season and post season that KG was the guy drilling those shots, but last night it was Pierce.


I agree with your assessment of what I'm saying. Pierce's shooting in the second half was not the reason that we won the game. It was dramatic, but I am categorically dismissing it as the reason that we won the game.

We won the game with defense and rebounding, period. L.A. was 13 of 19 in the second half, and lost all night on the boards.

How can you say that Pierce's blitz in the 3rd quarter won us the game, when we went into the second half of the 4th quarter up by 6 points? The game is not won at that point. Far from it. Whatever heroics may have happened before, you definitely have not won the game against Kobe Bryant when you are leading by only a handful of points with half the fourth quarter to go. The game needs to be won by tough defense at the end of the 4th, and that's what we did.

Look, if we win the trophy, and I think we will, there is nobody on this team that I am going to be happier for than Paul Pierce. There is nobody that is going to deserve it as much, nobody else on the team who has done as much for the city and basketball in Boston as him. It's going to be his night, no question. He's going to get everybody's applause, deservedly so, and mine included.

But look at KG for a minute. Like I say, if some guys have a tough guard, you start hearing excuses before the game about how they won't have anything left to give at the other end, so don't expect much, etc. Yet here's a guy who is expected to expend more energy on defense than any other guy on our squad night after night, and he does, yet he is still leading our team on the offensive end, too! He has been our leading scorer in 16 out of 21 playoff games.

You guys think that I don't get it about Pierce. Well, I think that you don't get it about KG. I'm not sure you even realize what you're getting a chance to see here. This is amazing stuff.
Image



Yabba-dabba-doo!
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

 

Post#49 » by sully00 » Fri Jun 6, 2008 5:22 pm

But look at KG for a minute. Like I say, if some guys have a tough guard, you start hearing excuses before the game about how they won't have anything left to give at the other end, so don't expect much, etc. Yet here's a guy who is expected to expend more energy on defense than any other guy on our squad night after night, and he does, yet he is still leading our team on the offensive end, too! He has been our leading scorer in 16 out of 21 playoff games.


On plenty of nights you may have a point but not last night. KG was volume shooting and doing a crappy job and roaming on defense. He was great on the glass but you seem to think KG should get credit in the Victory Cigar poll for being KG and what he means to this team on not on how he played last night which is what the award is about.

Trust me listen to the man's own words describing his play. He knows he should have gone for 30-35 points easy last night and you know what I don't doubt he will before this thing is over.
User avatar
Rondo_Fan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,954
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 17, 2006

 

Post#50 » by Rondo_Fan » Fri Jun 6, 2008 5:40 pm

sully00 wrote:
But look at KG for a minute. Like I say, if some guys have a tough guard, you start hearing excuses before the game about how they won't have anything left to give at the other end, so don't expect much, etc. Yet here's a guy who is expected to expend more energy on defense than any other guy on our squad night after night, and he does, yet he is still leading our team on the offensive end, too! He has been our leading scorer in 16 out of 21 playoff games.


On plenty of nights you may have a point but not last night. KG was volume shooting and doing a crappy job and roaming on defense. He was great on the glass but you seem to think KG should get credit in the Victory Cigar poll for being KG and what he means to this team on not on how he played last night which is what the award is about.

Trust me listen to the man's own words describing his play. He knows he should have gone for 30-35 points easy last night and you know what I don't doubt he will before this thing is over.


KG missed a bunch of shots, but they weren't bad shots. He didn't try to force anything. When Pierce misses shots that he is supposed to take, I don't have a problem with that either. It's good basketball.

To me, the critical part of the game was the last couple of minutes. We got a bunch of stops in a row. Now, I don't give KG credit for them necessarily, because there were a lot of misses by L.A.. But L.A. was taking shots that we wanted them to take--nothing in the paint. And KG's presence is largely what kept them out of the paint, at least as I see it. KG also had the dunk and a couple of big free throws in the last couple of minutes.

But let PP win the cigar. I'm just saying that it seems that the board in general undervalues KG relative to PP. PP has been with us a lot longer. But me, I like what both of them are doing. And KG seems very, very special to me. He's one of those guys that 10 or 20 years down the road, you're like, "Oh my God, I had no friggin' idea how good that guy was." And we're getting to watch it live.

We'll probably say the same thing about Pierce, come to think of it. He's grown up a lot this year, and is showing the kind of solid leadership that you want to see go along with his skill set. Maybe this year he will finally make the mark that will make us remember him forever. It takes championships around here.
Image



Yabba-dabba-doo!
User avatar
RickyDizzle
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,527
And1: 1,201
Joined: Feb 15, 2005
Location: Maine

 

Post#51 » by RickyDizzle » Fri Jun 6, 2008 5:43 pm

Rondo_Fan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I agree with your assessment of what I'm saying. Pierce's shooting in the second half was not the reason that we won the game. It was dramatic, but I am categorically dismissing it as the reason that we won the game.

We won the game with defense and rebounding, period. L.A. was 13 of 19 in the second half, and lost all night on the boards.

How can you say that Pierce's blitz in the 3rd quarter won us the game, when we went into the second half of the 4th quarter up by 6 points? The game is not won at that point. Far from it. Whatever heroics may have happened before, you definitely have not won the game against Kobe Bryant when you are leading by only a handful of points with half the fourth quarter to go. The game needs to be won by tough defense at the end of the 4th, and that's what we did.

Look, if we win the trophy, and I think we will, there is nobody on this team that I am going to be happier for than Paul Pierce. There is nobody that is going to deserve it as much, nobody else on the team who has done as much for the city and basketball in Boston as him. It's going to be his night, no question. He's going to get everybody's applause, deservedly so, and mine included.

But look at KG for a minute. Like I say, if some guys have a tough guard, you start hearing excuses before the game about how they won't have anything left to give at the other end, so don't expect much, etc. Yet here's a guy who is expected to expend more energy on defense than any other guy on our squad night after night, and he does, yet he is still leading our team on the offensive end, too! He has been our leading scorer in 16 out of 21 playoff games.

You guys think that I don't get it about Pierce. Well, I think that you don't get it about KG. I'm not sure you even realize what you're getting a chance to see here. This is amazing stuff.


^ That was my point too. You cant be a die hard Celtics fan and not love Paul Pierce and be happy for him. All I am saying is that those two 3's were not what won us the game, and KGs peformance (despite the bricks in the second half) was terriffic and unrightfully overshadowed by the drama of Pierce's come back.

Dont get me wrong, that was an exciting moment to see him come bouncing back onto the floor, but the Willis Reed comparisons and all that are making his play seem much more 'epic' then it really was. It was a great game played by a great player with great offensive efficiency, but KG is carrying the defense and still led us in points despite all the second half bricks...

-Dizzy
User avatar
The Laker Kid
General Manager
Posts: 9,493
And1: 6,962
Joined: Dec 16, 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA

 

Post#52 » by The Laker Kid » Sat Jun 7, 2008 5:46 am

I voted for RONDOOOOO!!! :bowdown:
MaxwellSmart wrote:I hate to say this, but Go Lakers....

Return to Boston Celtics