Lakers whining and crying about foul calls. Why?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

GonzoLays
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,092
And1: 185
Joined: Jun 16, 2003
Location: The strongest man is he who stands alone in the face of oppression and censorship.
   

Lakers whining and crying about foul calls. Why? 

Post#1 » by GonzoLays » Mon Jun 9, 2008 5:43 pm

Wasn't Boston the more aggressive team last night?

Did the Lakers take it to the hole?

Its kind of hard to get foul calls when all you do is shoot jump shots, right?

The Lakers really only have two players who are aggressive consistently at going to the hole in Kobe and Gasol.

Outside of those two guys, the rest of the team is bunch of jumpshooters. Thats the way the team was constructed around Kobe.

I could see if the Lakers were going to the hole, getting knocked down and still not getting the calls. But when you play all jumpshooters, what do you expect?



-------------------------------------------
title edited
-thief
The Main Event
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,086
And1: 577
Joined: Apr 30, 2008
Location: Everwhere you've never been

 

Post#2 » by The Main Event » Mon Jun 9, 2008 5:47 pm

The bad call that stands out in my mind last night was the 2nd foul called on Kobe where he swatted Ray's hand away on a blatant hand check/reach in. If the defender is gonna reach into the offensive players space than he has every right to brush his arm off, gimme a break. That foul changed the game imo.
"A particular shot or way of moving the ball can be a player's personal signature, but efficiency of performance is what wins the game for the team."
- Pat Riley
Showtime:Part2
General Manager
Posts: 8,434
And1: 514
Joined: Jul 12, 2003

 

Post#3 » by Showtime:Part2 » Mon Jun 9, 2008 5:49 pm

The Lakers took 30 shots within 5 feet. THIRTY!!! and they
got 10 FTs. Boston took 18.

http://www.sportsline.com/nba/gamecente ... 08_LAL@BOS
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/shotchart ... =280608002
Warspite:

Prince + filler for Kobe Bryant
To be honest the way Prince has played and with Kobes injury/age/mileage Im not sure I would do that deal either. Still Prince is more important and he wins the head to head battles with Kobe.
User avatar
mr_sunshine
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,430
And1: 482
Joined: Jun 30, 2007

 

Post#4 » by mr_sunshine » Mon Jun 9, 2008 5:49 pm

LA clearly deserved about about 20 more FTs, because you know they must have gotten fouled on at least 10 of the 40 jumpers they bricked. Regardless, it's part of the game. The Celtics got raped and shot around 100 less FTs than the Hawks in the opening round, and still manged to blow them out 4 times.
mr.ankle
Banned User
Posts: 5,149
And1: 57
Joined: May 26, 2001

 

Post#5 » by mr.ankle » Mon Jun 9, 2008 5:50 pm

The Refs have been bias against the Lakers the past two series
User avatar
mr_sunshine
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,430
And1: 482
Joined: Jun 30, 2007

 

Post#6 » by mr_sunshine » Mon Jun 9, 2008 5:53 pm

Showtime:Part2 wrote:The Lakers took 30 shots within 5 feet. THIRTY!!! and they
got 10 FTs. Boston took 18.

http://www.sportsline.com/nba/gamecente ... 08_LAL@BOS
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/shotchart ... =280608002


Hrm, let's see... do shot attempts within 5 feet count if you get fouled? No. Do you get points in the paint for free throws made if you get fouled in the paint? No. Hence Boston shot around the same (possibly more) shots close in than LA did, and they got fouled on them which removed the shot attempt from the box score/shot chart since they were fouled. Ya dig?

At least think about these things before you try and toss numbers around.
Showtime:Part2
General Manager
Posts: 8,434
And1: 514
Joined: Jul 12, 2003

 

Post#7 » by Showtime:Part2 » Mon Jun 9, 2008 5:55 pm

also how about the fact that on defense the celtics hack kobe and grab and hold him to prevent him from getting the ball at certain spots (like the mid post). however, if kobe touches pierce or allen, he gets a foul call.
Warspite:



Prince + filler for Kobe Bryant

To be honest the way Prince has played and with Kobes injury/age/mileage Im not sure I would do that deal either. Still Prince is more important and he wins the head to head battles with Kobe.
Showtime:Part2
General Manager
Posts: 8,434
And1: 514
Joined: Jul 12, 2003

 

Post#8 » by Showtime:Part2 » Mon Jun 9, 2008 5:57 pm

mr_sunshine wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Hrm, let's see... do shot attempts within 5 feet count if you get fouled? No. Do you get points in the paint for free throws made if you get fouled in the paint? No. Hence Boston shot around the same (possibly more) shots close in than LA did, and they got fouled on them which removed the shot attempt from the box score/shot chart since they were fouled. Ya dig?

At least think about these things before you try and toss numbers around.


you must be slow. i'm not insinuating the celtics were not being aggressive, i'm saying the celtics were getting foul calls in the paint, while we weren't. our shot count in the paint woulda been lower if we got the same calls you did. of course, with us, the refs "let them play," but with you it was called a foul everytime. at least think before you question someone majoring in math.
Warspite:



Prince + filler for Kobe Bryant

To be honest the way Prince has played and with Kobes injury/age/mileage Im not sure I would do that deal either. Still Prince is more important and he wins the head to head battles with Kobe.
The Main Event
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,086
And1: 577
Joined: Apr 30, 2008
Location: Everwhere you've never been

 

Post#9 » by The Main Event » Mon Jun 9, 2008 5:58 pm

Showtime:Part2 wrote:also how about the fact that on defense the celtics hack kobe and grab and hold him to prevent him from getting the ball at certain spots (like the mid post). however, if kobe touches pierce or allen, he gets a foul call.


Exxxxactly. It's become more and more apparent that Allen can resort to the Koala style defense where he literally hangs onto Kobes back but when Kobe brushes him off they call a foul. How in the world is Kobe able to swing his arm back and make contact with Allen if Allen isnt already basically impregnating him from behind??
It's called personal space, obviously it doesnt apply to Kobe.
The Main Event
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,086
And1: 577
Joined: Apr 30, 2008
Location: Everwhere you've never been

 

Post#10 » by The Main Event » Mon Jun 9, 2008 6:00 pm

not to mention the no-call on Pau's alley oop layup where he got levelled to the floor while on the other end they call a foul on Turiaf after pinning one of the Celtics and then crashing into him after the clean block.
Showtime:Part2
General Manager
Posts: 8,434
And1: 514
Joined: Jul 12, 2003

 

Post#11 » by Showtime:Part2 » Mon Jun 9, 2008 6:01 pm

The Main Event wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Exxxxactly. It's become more and more apparent that Allen can resort to the Koala style defense where he literally hangs onto Kobes back but when Kobe brushes him off they call a foul. How in the world is Kobe able to swing his arm back and make contact with Allen if Allen isnt already basically impregnating him from behind??
It's called personal space, obviously it doesnt apply to Kobe.


:rofl: haha koala defense.
Warspite:



Prince + filler for Kobe Bryant

To be honest the way Prince has played and with Kobes injury/age/mileage Im not sure I would do that deal either. Still Prince is more important and he wins the head to head battles with Kobe.
User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
Posts: 92,956
And1: 37,070
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
   

 

Post#12 » by RIPskaterdude » Mon Jun 9, 2008 6:02 pm

It's just nice to see the shoe on the other foot, for once 8)
Image
User avatar
shobe_81
Inactive user
Inactive user
Posts: 2,749
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 17, 2007

 

Post#13 » by shobe_81 » Mon Jun 9, 2008 6:03 pm

Could the mod please lock this dumbasses thread! It is heavily discussed in the game thread, why does this need its own?
Showtime:Part2
General Manager
Posts: 8,434
And1: 514
Joined: Jul 12, 2003

 

Post#14 » by Showtime:Part2 » Mon Jun 9, 2008 6:03 pm

xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:It's just nice to see the shoe on the other foot, for once 8)


two wrongs dont make a right. nice ethics.
Warspite:



Prince + filler for Kobe Bryant

To be honest the way Prince has played and with Kobes injury/age/mileage Im not sure I would do that deal either. Still Prince is more important and he wins the head to head battles with Kobe.
tkb
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,759
And1: 198
Joined: Mar 19, 2005
Location: Norway
   

 

Post#15 » by tkb » Mon Jun 9, 2008 6:05 pm

Leon Powe got more FT attempts in 14 minutes of play than the entire Laker team got the whole game. Aggressiveness or not, that's crazy. I don't think the Celtics were aggressive enough to defend them getting 4 times as many attempts at the stripe, but whatever.
User avatar
mr_sunshine
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,430
And1: 482
Joined: Jun 30, 2007

 

Post#16 » by mr_sunshine » Mon Jun 9, 2008 6:05 pm

mr.ankle wrote:The Refs have been bias against the Lakers the past two series


The Lakers shoot jump shots. Jump shots = less likely to get fouled = less FT attempts. Oh really? No wai! And the Spurs DID NOT FOUL KOBE. Period. They let him go to the rack uncontested sometimes rather than foul.
User avatar
TommyPoints
General Manager
Posts: 7,559
And1: 4,250
Joined: Feb 14, 2006
Location: Spurs of the East
 

 

Post#17 » by TommyPoints » Mon Jun 9, 2008 6:09 pm

tkb wrote:Leon Powe got more FT attempts in 14 minutes of play than the entire Laker team got the whole game. Aggressiveness or not, that's crazy. I don't think the Celtics were aggressive enough to defend them getting 4 times as many attempts at the stripe, but whatever.


Powe was getting the ball under the basket and fouled when he would go up with it. The Lakers usually couldn't even get in the paint. There is no conspiracy.
Image
User avatar
Falstaff
Starter
Posts: 2,140
And1: 412
Joined: Feb 02, 2005
 

 

Post#18 » by Falstaff » Mon Jun 9, 2008 6:09 pm

For all the Laker fans bitching about the calls, here is a quote from the great Phil Jackson: "What the ****'s wrong with you, go sit down!"

Y'all sound like Mike D'Antoni.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbkomSsaeLQ&NR=1
Showtime:Part2
General Manager
Posts: 8,434
And1: 514
Joined: Jul 12, 2003

 

Post#19 » by Showtime:Part2 » Mon Jun 9, 2008 6:12 pm

celts fans keep saying we were only shooting jumpers but ignore the stats about points in the paint and shots attempted in the paint. we were being aggressive. we did foul you, but you fouled us and the refs swallowed their whistles. also, how about they stop calling touch fouls on the mvp? since when does that happen?
Warspite:



Prince + filler for Kobe Bryant

To be honest the way Prince has played and with Kobes injury/age/mileage Im not sure I would do that deal either. Still Prince is more important and he wins the head to head battles with Kobe.
User avatar
L&H_05
RealGM
Posts: 11,569
And1: 94
Joined: Oct 02, 2005
Location: I love this game !
     

 

Post#20 » by L&H_05 » Mon Jun 9, 2008 6:13 pm

If Fisher and or Farmar would actually defend something moving, and stop Rondo's dribble penetration, this wouldn't be an issue..

It wasn't an issue for the Cavs for the most part, and we only had one guy that could attack the paint... However, we defended Boston, that's the difference..

You have to limit Rondo's creative ability, and get physical with Pierce, because they're the only two guys that can create any type of consistent offense for anyone else...

Fisher's defense has been absolutely pathetic thus far...Farmar's yet to play it as well..

Kobe needs to either guard Rondo or Pierce... Not Ray Allen..

Return to The General Board