ImageImageImageImageImage

Garcia as starting PG?

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Garcia as starting PG? 

Post#1 » by KF10 » Sun Jun 29, 2008 1:51 am

Probably not. But he's the best the Kings have at the moment -- even if it's not exactly a high standard -- and may turn out to be one of the better options once the roster is set for October, so it's a possibility.

Coach Reggie Theus said as much today, that he'd rather play Garcia at shooting guard and small forward but that more Garcia at the point has to at least be considered.

It would have been on the table anyway with second-round pick Sean Singletary the only natural at the position. Garcia's development there the second half of last season becomes another momentum shove for the idea.

The Kings have to like the opportunities for creating mismatches with 6-7 Garcia and 6-7 Kevin Martin in the backcourt. The obvious drawback: there would be payback on defense and Sac is bad enough there without Garcia in a transition period.


http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/sp ... .html#more
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Garcia as starting PG? 

Post#2 » by SacKingZZZ » Sun Jun 29, 2008 6:25 am

That would certainly be like having a young J-will all over again! But more bad than good I'm afraid. I would really love to see a Martin/Garcia, 2/3 combo every night. I think it's long overdue and they play very well together.
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Garcia as starting PG? 

Post#3 » by KF10 » Sun Jun 29, 2008 6:51 am

SacKingZZZ wrote:That would certainly be like having a young J-will all over again! But more bad than good I'm afraid. I would really love to see a Martin/Garcia, 2/3 combo every night. I think it's long overdue and they play very well together.


Yeah, but really he isn't really the solution though. He is more like the emergency PG. But it would be fun though to see them in action though. :D
User avatar
KingInExile
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,416
And1: 4
Joined: May 25, 2004
Location: RIP Wayman Tisdale...You left us way too early.

Re: Garcia as starting PG? 

Post#4 » by KingInExile » Sun Jun 29, 2008 4:48 pm

It's an option, but only a desperate one. Petrie needs to find another PG, if only as a stop-gap measure for the season to give Singletary time to develop (or until we can draft one next year).
This space needs to be filled with a new sig...but I'm too lazy to make one.
User avatar
_SRV_
Analyst
Posts: 3,030
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Location: brew for breakfast

Re: Garcia as starting PG? 

Post#5 » by _SRV_ » Sun Jun 29, 2008 5:04 pm

Garcia handles double teams and pressure too poorly to be a PG, his main fault is that he's erratic player, the last thing you want from your PG.
He makes good passes in open court, but nothing more special than many SGs in the league, the only thing that makes him close to a PG is his great handles, but that's not enough, if he was good to be PG, we would never have started that guy (forgot his name) Vs NO at last year's opener, that was too painful to watch.
BMiller52
RealGM
Posts: 10,403
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: my house

Re: Garcia as starting PG? 

Post#6 » by BMiller52 » Sun Jun 29, 2008 9:41 pm

_SRV_ wrote:Garcia handles double teams and pressure too poorly to be a PG, his main fault is that he's erratic player, the last thing you want from your PG.
He makes good passes in open court, but nothing more special than many SGs in the league, the only thing that makes him close to a PG is his great handles, but that's not enough, if he was good to be PG, we would never have started that guy (forgot his name) Vs NO at last year's opener, that was too painful to watch.



I agree.
vtime
Rookie
Posts: 1,224
And1: 297
Joined: May 29, 2006
Location: SAINT LOUIS, MO

Re: Garcia as starting PG? 

Post#7 » by vtime » Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:38 pm

Kings should've started Artest at pf and Garcia at sf. PF's cant guard Artest and he can certainly guard them. This would've made the Kings more uptempo which is Theus' style while allowing the team's best five to be on the court at the same time. I wonder how Hawes is coming along. With Hawes, S. Williams, and now Thomspon, that's 3 lottery pick bigs. Is the team still high on the youngster Justin Williams?
User avatar
pillwenney
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 48,887
And1: 2,603
Joined: Sep 19, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
Contact:
 

Re: Garcia as starting PG? 

Post#8 » by pillwenney » Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:43 am

vtime wrote:Kings should've started Artest at pf and Garcia at sf. PF's cant guard Artest and he can certainly guard them. This would've made the Kings more uptempo which is Theus' style while allowing the team's best five to be on the court at the same time. I wonder how Hawes is coming along. With Hawes, S. Williams, and now Thomspon, that's 3 lottery pick bigs. Is the team still high on the youngster Justin Williams?



Justin was waived last year. I'm not sure what his status is right now.

As for playing Artest at PF, we did that a lot last year, and there certainly are positives for it with the team constructed as it is right now. But the main problem is that even at PF Ron probably isn't quite as good of a rebounder as Mikki. And although the difference isn't huge, we really can't afford to lose any rebounding. Also, Mikki's finishing ability is valuable to use within the offense.
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

Re: Garcia as starting PG? 

Post#9 » by Smills91 » Mon Jun 30, 2008 1:22 am

Limit it to spot duty and I say ABSOFRUITLY. Full-time, NO, and I'm a HUGE Garcia advocate.

Return to Sacramento Kings