Monta Ellis vs. Kevin Martin.

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Who is the better basketball player?

Monta Ellis
25
48%
Kevin Martin
27
52%
 
Total votes: 52

KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Monta Ellis vs. Kevin Martin. 

Post#21 » by KF10 » Sun Jul 13, 2008 7:00 am

cb4lif3 wrote:
kingsfan10 wrote:
cb4lif3 wrote:monta...easily, im a raptors fan, im telling the truth, monta is much better than martin and will be better.


How is Monta "much better" than Martin? Expand your opinion.


cuz he's only getting better, better athlete, scores about 3 less ppg, but martin is at 45% while monta is at 53%...he is 3 years younger, his 3 is going to improve...

he gets more steals, more rebounds, and more assists...

he is basically better at everything but long range shooting.


I'm assuming that you haven't watch Martin play this season. It seems to me you go off by stats. This leads to inaccurate opinion about Martin. By saying he is "basically better at everything but long range shooting" leads me that you haven't seen play this year.
Lionel Messi
Banned User
Posts: 20,079
And1: 15
Joined: Jul 05, 2007
Location: You come at the king, you best not miss.

Re: Monta Ellis vs. Kevin Martin. 

Post#22 » by Lionel Messi » Sun Jul 13, 2008 7:09 am

kingsfan10 wrote:
cb4lif3 wrote:
kingsfan10 wrote:
How is Monta "much better" than Martin? Expand your opinion.


cuz he's only getting better, better athlete, scores about 3 less ppg, but martin is at 45% while monta is at 53%...he is 3 years younger, his 3 is going to improve...

he gets more steals, more rebounds, and more assists...

he is basically better at everything but long range shooting.


I'm assuming that you haven't watch Martin play this season. It seems to me you go off by stats. This leads to inaccurate opinion about Martin. By saying he is "basically better at everything but long range shooting" leads me that you haven't seen play this year.


ive seen them both play and in MY OPINION, if i was starting a franchise iw ould pick monta over martin...

but u've obviously seen more of them since ur a kings fan and u see more west coast action, show me where im wrong, dont say monta isnt a better athlete...maybe he is worse at overall shooting since he needs to be polished there, but his drives are really improving and he is just growing as a player exponentially
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Monta Ellis vs. Kevin Martin. 

Post#23 » by KF10 » Sun Jul 13, 2008 7:43 am

Well, lets see here. We both can agree that Martin is the better shooter overall. Martin is not only a shooter he is an ELITE (efficient) socrer. He was 6th in the NBA in PPG last year. He had TS% of .618. Kevin Martin also had a TS% of .614 in 06/07, and .604 in 05/06. He is the only SG in the NBA that had back to back to back TS% over 60%. He is already in elite status when attacking the rim, with 9.5 fta/g in 07/08 (which is 5th in the NBA) He was 1st in the league in FTs made per game, 8.2. Ellis is a good scorer but no where near Martin's level. Comparing Ellis 5.2 fta/g and 4.0 ft/m. Martin has the total package of an offensive juggernaut in contrast to Ellis limitations of shooting beyond mid range. But I have to say Ellis mid range game is already one of the best in the NBA. So, I can see he can improve his range. But Ellis average 0.6 3s per game and averaging 23.1%. Compare to Martin's 4.4 3s per game and averaging 40.1%. Martin is soo much better moving w/o the ball. Already one of the NBA's best of doing it. Ellis is better finishing around the rim than Martin. Ellis is a great athlete by doing so. But he has a 31.5 max vert. I assume that he had a higher vert. Which is kinda low compare to Martin's 38 inch vert. While Martin is clearly has a 5 inch advantage height wise. He is ideal at the 2 spot. Ellis has better passing abilities. This is because he is a 1/2. But he has to get better in that aspect though. But Martin has shown promise in that aspect. Even though stats doesn't show. He is pretty good doing his usual "drive-and-kick" to the open man. True, Ellis average more rebounds (5.2) compare to Martin's (4.5) but this could lead to the inflation of stats of "Nellieball" This fast pace tempo leads to more possessions and etc thus more rebounds/steals. If you put Martin in that system, he will be averaging a heck of a lot more points/boards/steals etc. Well, all in all, Martin is in another level in terms of offense.

In defense, both players use their quickness/length to harass the opposition. But Monta plays the passing lane more thus overplaying the opponent. In compare to Martin, he doesn't gamble like Ellis but at times he does. Martin is a better effective defender than Ellis. But to be honest, Martin is an inconsistent defender. At times he is a good defender and at times he looks like average. But then again, Martin has to carry the scoring load. He can't do it at both ends. Even though, he did at times throughout the season, he looked like a frkin superstar. But I would say it is kinda wash in defense.

Well, even though, Im missing some aspects of the game and etc. Either way, this is significant. So, again, I choose Martin.
Abyss Impact
Banned User
Posts: 1,948
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 27, 2008
Location: San Francisco

Re: Monta Ellis vs. Kevin Martin. 

Post#24 » by Abyss Impact » Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:48 pm

Martin > Ellis
joew8302
Senior
Posts: 646
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 06, 2008

Re: Monta Ellis vs. Kevin Martin. 

Post#25 » by joew8302 » Sun Jul 13, 2008 11:37 pm

Great comparison, it is close but I will have to go with Martin.
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,100
And1: 20,094
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

Re: Monta Ellis vs. Kevin Martin. 

Post#26 » by NO-KG-AI » Mon Jul 14, 2008 12:09 am

cb4lif3 wrote:
kingsfan10 wrote:
cb4lif3 wrote:monta...easily, im a raptors fan, im telling the truth, monta is much better than martin and will be better.


How is Monta "much better" than Martin? Expand your opinion.


cuz he's only getting better, better athlete, scores about 3 less ppg, but martin is at 45% while monta is at 53%...he is 3 years younger, his 3 is going to improve...

he gets more steals, more rebounds, and more assists...

he is basically better at everything but long range shooting.


Adjust for pace and look at TS% and then go laugh at yourself :-/
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
BROWN
RealGM
Posts: 10,955
And1: 74
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: RealCity - MTL

Re: Monta Ellis vs. Kevin Martin. 

Post#27 » by BROWN » Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:35 am

Here we go again...
Monta Ellis
User avatar
yehyeh82
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,101
And1: 5
Joined: Dec 07, 2005
Location: 707

Re: Monta Ellis vs. Kevin Martin. 

Post#28 » by yehyeh82 » Mon Jul 14, 2008 3:59 pm

kingsfan10 wrote:Well, lets see here. We both can agree that Martin is the better shooter overall. Martin is not only a shooter he is an ELITE (efficient) socrer. He was 6th in the NBA in PPG last year. He had TS% of .618. Kevin Martin also had a TS% of .614 in 06/07, and .604 in 05/06. He is the only SG in the NBA that had back to back to back TS% over 60%. He is already in elite status when attacking the rim, with 9.5 fta/g in 07/08 (which is 5th in the NBA) He was 1st in the league in FTs made per game, 8.2. Ellis is a good scorer but no where near Martin's level. Comparing Ellis 5.2 fta/g and 4.0 ft/m. Martin has the total package of an offensive juggernaut in contrast to Ellis limitations of shooting beyond mid range. But I have to say Ellis mid range game is already one of the best in the NBA. So, I can see he can improve his range. But Ellis average 0.6 3s per game and averaging 23.1%. Compare to Martin's 4.4 3s per game and averaging 40.1%. Martin is soo much better moving w/o the ball. Already one of the NBA's best of doing it. Ellis is better finishing around the rim than Martin. Ellis is a great athlete by doing so. But he has a 31.5 max vert. I assume that he had a higher vert. Which is kinda low compare to Martin's 38 inch vert. While Martin is clearly has a 5 inch advantage height wise. He is ideal at the 2 spot. Ellis has better passing abilities. This is because he is a 1/2. But he has to get better in that aspect though. But Martin has shown promise in that aspect. Even though stats doesn't show. He is pretty good doing his usual "drive-and-kick" to the open man. True, Ellis average more rebounds (5.2) compare to Martin's (4.5) but this could lead to the inflation of stats of "Nellieball" This fast pace tempo leads to more possessions and etc thus more rebounds/steals. If you put Martin in that system, he will be averaging a heck of a lot more points/boards/steals etc. Well, all in all, Martin is in another level in terms of offense.

In defense, both players use their quickness/length to harass the opposition. But Monta plays the passing lane more thus overplaying the opponent. In compare to Martin, he doesn't gamble like Ellis but at times he does. Martin is a better effective defender than Ellis. But to be honest, Martin is an inconsistent defender. At times he is a good defender and at times he looks like average. But then again, Martin has to carry the scoring load. He can't do it at both ends. Even though, he did at times throughout the season, he looked like a frkin superstar. But I would say it is kinda wash in defense.

Well, even though, Im missing some aspects of the game and etc. Either way, this is significant. So, again, I choose Martin.



First of all, if oyu honestly think that Monta only has a 31.5" vertical leap, then your observational skills are pretty poor and I can't take anything you say seriously. I mean, a 6'3" guy who can almost hit his head on the rim must be able to jump pretty high or there is something very weird going on on the court.

Second, I'm not going to get into who is better because I feel they are pretty even and it reaqlly depends on the complimentary players you have assembled on your team to decide which player you would rather have. While I do feel that this post highlights all of Martin's plusses while glossing over (and giving excuses) for his minuses, while it does the exact opposite for Monta. Maybe, just maybe, it could be that Monta is a better rebounder than Martin. No, that can't be it, it has to be the system, and Don Nelson, and daylight savings time, and, oh yeah, Martin is getting better at it too!

Now I can't wait until this year because the two will be on even ground. Martin has been the premier scorer on the Kings for a few years while Monta has been a 3rd option. Now that Baron is gone we are going to see how Monta does with the keys in his hands. He could blow up even more with added opportunities or he could fall back from the added attention. Its really something that we are going to have to wait and see how he adjusts to this new role. I think this comparison will be much easier to make at the end of next year. Then we can do more homeristic battles to the death!
Bill Walton after comparing a Lebron dunk to Angel Falls wrote: Now that is a big waterfall and that was a big throwdown
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: Monta Ellis vs. Kevin Martin. 

Post#29 » by dockingsched » Mon Jul 14, 2008 4:04 pm

monta ellis is a game changer. i'll take him.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
User avatar
celticfan42487
RealGM
Posts: 27,526
And1: 15,365
Joined: Jul 22, 2005
Location: Billerica, MA
       

Re: Monta Ellis vs. Kevin Martin. 

Post#30 » by celticfan42487 » Mon Jul 14, 2008 4:15 pm

AL Jefferson!
Image
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Monta Ellis vs. Kevin Martin. 

Post#31 » by KF10 » Mon Jul 14, 2008 6:00 pm

yehyeh82 wrote:
kingsfan10 wrote:Well, lets see here. We both can agree that Martin is the better shooter overall. Martin is not only a shooter he is an ELITE (efficient) socrer. He was 6th in the NBA in PPG last year. He had TS% of .618. Kevin Martin also had a TS% of .614 in 06/07, and .604 in 05/06. He is the only SG in the NBA that had back to back to back TS% over 60%. He is already in elite status when attacking the rim, with 9.5 fta/g in 07/08 (which is 5th in the NBA) He was 1st in the league in FTs made per game, 8.2. Ellis is a good scorer but no where near Martin's level. Comparing Ellis 5.2 fta/g and 4.0 ft/m. Martin has the total package of an offensive juggernaut in contrast to Ellis limitations of shooting beyond mid range. But I have to say Ellis mid range game is already one of the best in the NBA. So, I can see he can improve his range. But Ellis average 0.6 3s per game and averaging 23.1%. Compare to Martin's 4.4 3s per game and averaging 40.1%. Martin is soo much better moving w/o the ball. Already one of the NBA's best of doing it. Ellis is better finishing around the rim than Martin. Ellis is a great athlete by doing so. But he has a 31.5 max vert. I assume that he had a higher vert. Which is kinda low compare to Martin's 38 inch vert. While Martin is clearly has a 5 inch advantage height wise. He is ideal at the 2 spot. Ellis has better passing abilities. This is because he is a 1/2. But he has to get better in that aspect though. But Martin has shown promise in that aspect. Even though stats doesn't show. He is pretty good doing his usual "drive-and-kick" to the open man. True, Ellis average more rebounds (5.2) compare to Martin's (4.5) but this could lead to the inflation of stats of "Nellieball" This fast pace tempo leads to more possessions and etc thus more rebounds/steals. If you put Martin in that system, he will be averaging a heck of a lot more points/boards/steals etc. Well, all in all, Martin is in another level in terms of offense.

In defense, both players use their quickness/length to harass the opposition. But Monta plays the passing lane more thus overplaying the opponent. In compare to Martin, he doesn't gamble like Ellis but at times he does. Martin is a better effective defender than Ellis. But to be honest, Martin is an inconsistent defender. At times he is a good defender and at times he looks like average. But then again, Martin has to carry the scoring load. He can't do it at both ends. Even though, he did at times throughout the season, he looked like a frkin superstar. But I would say it is kinda wash in defense.

Well, even though, Im missing some aspects of the game and etc. Either way, this is significant. So, again, I choose Martin.



First of all, if oyu honestly think that Monta only has a 31.5" vertical leap, then your observational skills are pretty poor and I can't take anything you say seriously. I mean, a 6'3" guy who can almost hit his head on the rim must be able to jump pretty high or there is something very weird going on on the court.

Second, I'm not going to get into who is better because I feel they are pretty even and it reaqlly depends on the complimentary players you have assembled on your team to decide which player you would rather have. While I do feel that this post highlights all of Martin's plusses while glossing over (and giving excuses) for his minuses, while it does the exact opposite for Monta. Maybe, just maybe, it could be that Monta is a better rebounder than Martin. No, that can't be it, it has to be the system, and Don Nelson, and daylight savings time, and, oh yeah, Martin is getting better at it too!

Now I can't wait until this year because the two will be on even ground. Martin has been the premier scorer on the Kings for a few years while Monta has been a 3rd option. Now that Baron is gone we are going to see how Monta does with the keys in his hands. He could blow up even more with added opportunities or he could fall back from the added attention. Its really something that we are going to have to wait and see how he adjusts to this new role. I think this comparison will be much easier to make at the end of next year. Then we can do more homeristic battles to the death!


No. I do not think that. I said that I would assume that he would have a higher vert. But according to draft measurements he was listed 31.5. http://www.draftexpress.com/nba-pre-dra ... s=0&sort=9
My initial response was "WTF?" Ellis seem to have a higher vert. Clearly in the high 30's. So, sorry, if I lead you on like that. Don't blame my observation skills (I seen Ellis significantly in the past years and recently) Blame draftexpress for that "anomaly" measurement.

But when you said Martin was the premier scorer for the Kings for years. Well, not true. During his sophomore/junior year. He was a 3rd option behind Artest and Bibby. But still, he is still a efficient and potent. But last year he was the 2nd option behind Artest.
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,647
And1: 6,310
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: Monta Ellis vs. Kevin Martin. 

Post#32 » by gswhoops » Tue Jul 15, 2008 7:07 am

KInd of apples and oranges IMO because Ellis is going to be playing point from here on out, but I'll take him.
User avatar
shawngoat23
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,622
And1: 287
Joined: Apr 17, 2008

Re: Monta Ellis vs. Kevin Martin. 

Post#33 » by shawngoat23 » Tue Jul 15, 2008 7:33 am

Give me Martin. Comparable numbers on a less offensive friendly system. Better efficiency despite having crappier teammates.
penbeast0 wrote:Yes, he did. And as a mod, I can't even put him on ignore . . . sigh.

Return to Player Comparisons