Blue Jays Answer: Manny
Moderator: JaysRule15
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
- torontoaces04
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,365
- And1: 518
- Joined: Jun 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
if we were to somehow land manny, wells will hit 40 homers.
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 5,050
- And1: 3
- Joined: Feb 27, 2007
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
Manny ain't happening. Forget about it folks. His agent is looking for a 4-5 yr deal around 85 million. No way we're gonna pay him so much money and deal with his attitude later on. Players like Manny wear their welcome out pretty soon with their attitude and its best that we sign him to no more than 2 years at most.
If Manny doesn't happen, I wouldn't be opposed to trading for Huff from the Orioles, they need a first baseman (Overybay).
If Manny doesn't happen, I wouldn't be opposed to trading for Huff from the Orioles, they need a first baseman (Overybay).
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
-
- Junior
- Posts: 435
- And1: 0
- Joined: Sep 30, 2008
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/w ... index.html
looks like the boys at SI believe the jays are in the mix so all u ppl that dont believe manny is comin to the jays, just sit back and watch!!
looks like the boys at SI believe the jays are in the mix so all u ppl that dont believe manny is comin to the jays, just sit back and watch!!
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 20,974
- And1: 3,428
- Joined: Dec 29, 2005
- Location: Jurassic Park
-
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
I just was reading some blogs and so forth and it looks like Mike Wilner is saying the Jays might be the best fit for Man-Ram just for the simple fact that the Mets need arms and so do the Yanks. I wouldn't count the Yanks out just yet for the simple fact that they have a unlimited payroll it looks like and they could always use a player to piss off the Red Sox's.
I think 6 years is a tad much for Manny I would do 4 years tops at $90,000,000 maybe 5 if it's a Team Option other then that I would pass.
I think 6 years is a tad much for Manny I would do 4 years tops at $90,000,000 maybe 5 if it's a Team Option other then that I would pass.
Lord Leoshes wrote:i personally would rather keep Chalmers over Lowry
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,572
- And1: 18,057
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
-
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
Manny is still a tremendous hitter. But $90m for a guy's age 37, 38, 39 and 40 seasons? Yikes.

**** your asterisk.
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,729
- And1: 6,662
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
-
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
Honestly, deep down I know that it's too much for a guy of his age, but I feel like the Jays need a player like Manny to rejuvenate the fan base. When Manny's deal is up, our younger players will be coming into their prime and we can go in a new direction.
I think it would take getting rid of BJ, not pursuing AJ, and maybe trading Lyle.
Now personally, I think that losing BJ and Lyle for Manny is a fair trade off (because I think AJ is gone regardless)... so I would say do it, he isn't the type of player that is going to hit poorly as he ages, and he's going to love the laid back atmosphere in Toronto, to an extent.
I think it would take getting rid of BJ, not pursuing AJ, and maybe trading Lyle.
Now personally, I think that losing BJ and Lyle for Manny is a fair trade off (because I think AJ is gone regardless)... so I would say do it, he isn't the type of player that is going to hit poorly as he ages, and he's going to love the laid back atmosphere in Toronto, to an extent.
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 20,974
- And1: 3,428
- Joined: Dec 29, 2005
- Location: Jurassic Park
-
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
Schadenfreude wrote:Manny is still a tremendous hitter. But $90m for a guy's age 37, 38, 39 and 40 seasons? Yikes.
As a DH he could perduce into his 40's I think, Thats just me though. Who else is in the FA pool that could help us become the team we need to be?
Lord Leoshes wrote:i personally would rather keep Chalmers over Lowry
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
- Mufasa
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 994
- And1: 1
- Joined: Oct 10, 2008
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
I don't know how anyone could opposte signing him. Yes, when he gets near his 40s he'll suck... but by that time Halladay will be old anyways and we're not gonna be winning **** anyways. With Manny, we have the possibility of contending, isn't that the ultimate goal?... Even if it's just for a few years and we pay the price after. I say go for it, we have to go for a championship when the oppurtunity's there.
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
- Geddy
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 69,890
- And1: 78,609
- Joined: Nov 30, 2005
- Location: Drinking an extra cole Sprite
-
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
So JP is saying that they will think about Manny but won't throw huge money at him.
Full Article
Around baseball, people keep wondering: Which teams might be interested in Manny Ramirez as a free agent?
Here's one: The Toronto Blue Jays.
Jays general manager J.P. Ricciardi downplays his team's chances of landing Ramirez, but says the Jays' primary offseason goals are to re-sign right-hander A.J. Burnett and add a hitter.
Burnett, who is expected to opt out of his contract and become a free agent, could command between $15 million and $18 million per season.
If the Jays lost him, they almost certainly would not commit the same kind of money to another starting pitcher, giving them the payroll flexibility to possibly make a run at Ramirez.
"Manny is not priority No. 1. I can't even say he's priority No. 2," Ricciardi said Wednesday. "It would really be a long shot for us to bring him to Toronto. He's on our radar, but maybe not on our radar like some people will report.
"I don't see us getting involved in unbelievable, astronomical numbers. We would not go down that path."
Ramirez, 36, is expected to seek at least $25 million per season, and his agent, Scott Boras, has recently indicated that he might pursue a six-year deal.
The Jays, like many clubs, would be concerned that Boras might prolong the negotiations, possibly preventing them from filling other needs.
However, the addition of Ramirez would transform the Blue Jays' offense and energize the team's fan base.
Full Article
Inevitable wrote:Geddy is a good mod actually
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 5,050
- And1: 3
- Joined: Feb 27, 2007
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
good to know that.. Its not sensible to throw 25+ mill per year at Manny especially for a market like the jays.. if he settles for a 2 yr 40 mill deal, i say go for it..
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,451
- And1: 91
- Joined: Apr 19, 2004
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
id leave Burnett on the table if he wants more money he can go else where. Try to move Overbay and maybe BJ Ryan to free up some cash. Use what we would have of Burnett and get a big Bat.
Lind 1B and Manny DH.
Are rotation wont do that bad, you do have a guy who can now score runs in BUNCHES.
Halladay
Marcum
McGowan
Litcsh
Romero/Purcy
Take your pick... 3/5 thoes guys well atleast 2 can pitch and dont need a whole lota runs to win a game.
Lind 1B and Manny DH.
Are rotation wont do that bad, you do have a guy who can now score runs in BUNCHES.
Halladay
Marcum
McGowan
Litcsh
Romero/Purcy
Take your pick... 3/5 thoes guys well atleast 2 can pitch and dont need a whole lota runs to win a game.
Raptors, Leafs, Jays. #Toronto
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,032
- And1: 42
- Joined: Feb 26, 2007
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
Dude Marcum and McGowan are out for the season with injuries/recovering from surgery
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,901
- And1: 14
- Joined: Aug 02, 2005
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
http://www.sportsnet.ca/baseball/2008/11/20/ricciardi_ramirez_manny/
Toronto Blue Jays fans got a dose of winter reality on Thursday when J.P. Ricciardi put to rest the idea of signing free-agent slugger Manny Ramirez.
"He's a great hitter, so it's tempting. But being tempted and being realistic are two separate things," Ricciardi told ESPN columnist Jayson Stark. "We won't be involved with Manny. That keeps coming up, but it's not true. I think one reason is that Manny has always liked it in Toronto. He's hit more home runs here than anybody. And he likes the city, because he can fly under the radar here."
Toronto Blue Jays fans got a dose of winter reality on Thursday when J.P. Ricciardi put to rest the idea of signing free-agent slugger Manny Ramirez.
"He's a great hitter, so it's tempting. But being tempted and being realistic are two separate things," Ricciardi told ESPN columnist Jayson Stark. "We won't be involved with Manny. That keeps coming up, but it's not true. I think one reason is that Manny has always liked it in Toronto. He's hit more home runs here than anybody. And he likes the city, because he can fly under the radar here."
Re: Blue Jays Answer: Manny
- mini
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,288
- And1: 115
- Joined: Jun 01, 2003
- Location: Toronto, ON