rsavaj wrote:EJ said that Mayo wasn't an 'exciting player'. ORLY?!
Whoever EJ is, he's an idiot.
Got Mayo?

Did anybody else see Amare/Mayo swap Jerseys. They would make a nice duo in the M.
Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
rsavaj wrote:EJ said that Mayo wasn't an 'exciting player'. ORLY?!
pardon_my_interruption wrote:rsavaj wrote:EJ said that Mayo wasn't an 'exciting player'. ORLY?!
Whoever EJ is, he's an idiot.
Got Mayo?
Did anybody else see Amare/Mayo swap Jerseys. They would make a nice duo in the M.
lilfishi22 wrote:uhhh . . . . I guess 6-2 is still 6-2 on the standings.
Scrappy scrappy game. Hard to believe our go-to guy was Barbosa. Amare was ok, nothing special. We shouldn't have been pushed this far, especially by the Grizzlies, no offense to GrizzFan. If we want to be in the upper echelon of the WC when playoffs begin we have to handle our business against non-playoff teams sicne it's against these teams we gotta get our wins from. As good as Mayo and Gay played, we almost lost because we almost beat ourselves with TO's.
I dunno if it's just me, but I have a feeling that Nash is starting to slip.
commadoor 64 wrote:lilfishi22 wrote:uhhh . . . . I guess 6-2 is still 6-2 on the standings.
Scrappy scrappy game. Hard to believe our go-to guy was Barbosa. Amare was ok, nothing special. We shouldn't have been pushed this far, especially by the Grizzlies, no offense to GrizzFan. If we want to be in the upper echelon of the WC when playoffs begin we have to handle our business against non-playoff teams sicne it's against these teams we gotta get our wins from. As good as Mayo and Gay played, we almost lost because we almost beat ourselves with TO's.
I dunno if it's just me, but I have a feeling that Nash is starting to slip.
No offense taken by A grizzfan but, instead of casually dismissing the poor ole' lonely Grizz, do you think it might just be possible that the Grizz are an improving team, dare I say a better team than as of the last few seasons?
Just throwing it out there, of course.
commadoor 64 wrote:lilfishi22 wrote:uhhh . . . . I guess 6-2 is still 6-2 on the standings.
Scrappy scrappy game. Hard to believe our go-to guy was Barbosa. Amare was ok, nothing special. We shouldn't have been pushed this far, especially by the Grizzlies, no offense to GrizzFan. If we want to be in the upper echelon of the WC when playoffs begin we have to handle our business against non-playoff teams sicne it's against these teams we gotta get our wins from. As good as Mayo and Gay played, we almost lost because we almost beat ourselves with TO's.
I dunno if it's just me, but I have a feeling that Nash is starting to slip.
No offense taken by A grizzfan but, instead of casually dismissing the poor ole' lonely Grizz, do you think it might just be possible that the Grizz are an improving team, dare I say a better team than as of the last few seasons?
Just throwing it out there, of course.
JohnVancouver wrote:So - what I get from this is that the defense hasn't really improved much - lower scores being more a function of the slow down pace than stops - and the offense has diminished, so it's the worst of both worlds. maybe it's like cleaning your room - you know, about halfway through it looks worse than it did when you started ...
Never Fear 33 Is Here wrote:JohnVancouver wrote:So - what I get from this is that the defense hasn't really improved much - lower scores being more a function of the slow down pace than stops - and the offense has diminished, so it's the worst of both worlds. maybe it's like cleaning your room - you know, about halfway through it looks worse than it did when you started ...
???
It's either one way or the other........................
What I mean by that is, if the lower scores defensively is more of a function of the slow down pace than stops, then isn't it the same on the offensive end? Aren't we shooting some ridiculous % as a team and still averaging over 100PPG whilst taking some 10 shots less?
JohnVancouver wrote:Never Fear 33 Is Here wrote:JohnVancouver wrote:So - what I get from this is that the defense hasn't really improved much - lower scores being more a function of the slow down pace than stops - and the offense has diminished, so it's the worst of both worlds. maybe it's like cleaning your room - you know, about halfway through it looks worse than it did when you started ...
???
It's either one way or the other........................
What I mean by that is, if the lower scores defensively is more of a function of the slow down pace than stops, then isn't it the same on the offensive end? Aren't we shooting some ridiculous % as a team and still averaging over 100PPG whilst taking some 10 shots less?
--- And what I meant was that, it looks like the lower scoring against us is more because there are fewer possessions and a slower pace. I haven't delved into the stats re: what percentage we're allowing on defense.
Is it any better than last year?