Wiz99 wrote:spaceman_E wrote:I'm not sure where else to put this but...
http://www.nbadraft.net/mcchesney005.htmlIt's basically a study out to prove once and for all how badly you need Superstar, top 3-5 players in the league talent to win NBA championships, not just a bunch of All-Stars or good players.
"76. Gilbert Arenas 11 + 8 + 0 = 19 / 5 = 3.8"
The list only goes to 80, but I still think you all should know that we CAN win a championship with Gil, according to this article. So, hurrah.
Now that Gil's officially signed, I can't help but wonder how history will look back on him. An all time great who treated his city to trophies? Or an amazingly talented man who tantalized the fans, but never delivered a ring? The article Spaceman links to gives a great insight.Basically, the guy starts with the premise that "the basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime" and then he tries to ID which players in the past 50 years fit the profile of "a superstar" that you can win a 'chip with. He assigns points to players according to his own system, based on votes for MVP, all nba, all defensive teams and defensive player of the year.
His system pops out 80 guys since 1956. Gil is #73. However, a few grains of salt are due. His list naturally falls into 3 sublists, of guys who were and are true superstars their whole career (he calls them Gold Medal Superstars), those who were great for several seasons but then merely very good for the rest of their years (Silver), and then a third tier who ere top 15 players in the league, but never among the best (Bronze).
Gil falls into the last tier, near the end of the list of 80 great players since 1956, in the "Bronze" level. Does that mean we can win a championship with Gil? I think his peers on the list tell us five ways Gils career could go: Kevin McHale, Chauncey Billups, Dwight Howard, Bernard King and Afernee Hardaway. Gil could turn out to be any one of these guys.
Take McHale. He's a Hall of Famer. He put up some ungodly numbers for a big chunk of his career with the Celts - take 1986: 26 and 10, a year sandwiched in the middle of 6 others. Yet few people would argue the Celts win 3 championships with just McHale. Without Bird, arguably they would have won none. The 76ers with Dr. J, Moses Malone, a young Barkley AND a wise-old Mo Cheeks almost certainly would have surpassed the Bird-less Celts. By all rights, the 76ers were STACKED and should have been the Celts.
The moral: there are Bronze medal stars (McHale) and then there are Gold medal stars (Bird). So far, Gil is a C list star who has not elevated his team to greatness. But maybe Gil doesn't have to be a Bird- or MJ-level talent for us to win a 'chip.
Now take Billups. No one would put him in the same crew as MJ, Bird et al. But he's got a trophy. Mainly because his management put a great set of players around him - Rasheed, Wallace, Prince, Rip, Okur, Big Nasty, even guys like Elden Campbell, Mike James and Chucky Atkins who could really ball in a pinch. A pretty easy path to the Finals (the East was at its nadir in 03-04, with Indiana the Piston's only legit competition). Got lucky with the Shaq-Kobe-Payton-Malone Lakers basically bickering themselves into losing the Finals. And a great, great coach in Larry Brown (who replaced a guy who is nearly as good but probably the most underrated coach in the league, Rick Carlisle).
The moral of THIS story? A Bronze level star like Billups can still bring a ring to his hometown, if all the stars align with his running mates, the coach, players committing to the coach's system, and getting the breaks with the competition.Fine, so what about Dwight Howard. Howard seems like he could easily become an A level superstar, he just hasn't had enough years in the league. I mean, hell, the guy finished his 4th NBA season and just turned 23 while averaging 22 and 10 with 2+ blocks. Those are stats Hakeem and Ewing put up at the same age.
How's this like our little man Gil? Maybe he too just needs a bit more time to elevate to all time superstar status. Example: John Stockton, who's greatness didn't blossom until he had several seasons of starter's minutes. Gil has been in the league 7 seasons, but he's only had 3 seasons where he was getting starter's minutes (playing more than 3000 minutes in a season, or 36 mpg). And in his last season for the injury, Gil was approaching star status. In other words, Gil hasn't even reached his prime yet (?)
But what about that knee... I hate to mention him, but here he is. Anfernee Hardaway. Who was incredible for three years before he injured his knees. He was Shaq's right hand man the two years the Magic won 1st in the East, averaging 21 ppg and 7 dimes and 4 boards.
I hate to say it, but there's also a possibility Gil goes this way, like Anfernee, his great physical gifts burn bright for a few brilliant years, but tragically get cut short by that merciless thief, injury. All the news says Gil and his knees are back, but he HAS had two surgeries on them in the past year.
But what honestly worries me more is Gil could end up like Bernard King. BK was a prolific scorer who averaged 23 ppg over a 16 year career, even throwing down 28.4 ppg and an all star appearance for Les Wiz at age 34. Everyone at the time agreed there was no one better at scoring. But they also agreed Bernard King did little else. Because of this, BK's teams always had a chance to win any single game if he got hot, but had little chance of grinding out a 7 game series in the playoffs. Bernard only made it out of the 1st round 2x in his career.
Gil is in danger of earning the same MO as Bernard King: great scorer who's teams go nowhere in the playoffs.Gil, I'm dying to know which way your career goes from here. To all time greatness and we all have the privilege of riding your coattails to several trophies? To good enough that if Grunfeld gets your supporting cast and coach right, we have a really good shot? Or simply entertaining as hell to watch, but fatally flawed and leading teams that are equally fun to follow which lack that certain something champions use to fight past their peers?
Wither Gil, the Wiz, and we fans?