SacTown Kings wrote:Wow Theus keeps puting his faith in Douby and Douby keeps failing (the guy can't possibly have any more confidence left). I wonder how many more times this is going to happen, I mean surely either Theus figures it out or Douby finally makes a shot.
Bobby was playing shooting bad but we were doing fine. We caught up and were staying right with Utah. Then Theus decides to all of a sudden put in a guy who hasn't played all game and has failed every single time he has been in those situations. Wow, just wow. And people are asking who Theus should of played instaed of Douby. How about just leave it the way it was since we were doing fine, or how about anybody except for the person that has repeatedly missed shots in those situations.
This game shows you the difference between a good coach and a not good coach.
Sloan with scrubs >>>>> Theus with Kings
Thing is, we didn't really lose because of Douby. The only thing that Douby did wrong when he was in the game was miss 2 shots--which wasn't pretty, but it's not like Bobby was going to make them, in all likelihood. And after Korver had been killing us all game, Douby did do a better job on him defensively.
We lost the game because Deron decided in the final minutes that he wanted to start playing like Deron Williams and we couldn't stop them.
We also lost because of injuries. Now I agree with the general point that going to the "we need to get healthy" well too much is weak and we probably do it too much, but I have a specific reason here. Right now (and this has been the case for weeks now) we have trouble with close games because I don't think there have been any close games recently where we've had 5 guys that were playing well all game on the floor (or any blowouts for that matter, but those are irrelevant). And it goes back to why, while the decision to put in Douby probably wasn't smart, it wasn't as dumb as people are making it out to be. With Cisco unable to keep playing, and Salmons out, we simply didn't have 5 good players on the court. B-Jax played well for a stretch in the 3rd, but was otherwise just missing jumpers all game long, but he and Douby were really our only options (I think Korver probably would have really torched Brown). And Utah played to that defensively. Beno was having a nice game scoring-wise (albeit another TO-happy game), Kevin was a little below average for his efforts, but still quite good, and Brad and Spencer had both been playing well. Cisco would have been ideal if we had been able to play him, and I would even take that a step further. If we had been able to play Cisco, I think we would have won that game. He was just a much better option for us on both ends of the floor, even in his rusty state. I mean that makes a huge difference, when the role of that player is basically to defend and catch-and-shoot.
Now I'm not saying that we'll be a significantly better team when we get healthy. I think we'll still suck. But in close games, it will make a huge, huge difference to be able to trot out 5 healthy, capable players.
On another note, B-Jax and Udrih is a poorly matched backcourt. Both are more effective driving to the basket, and thus both are more effective with the ball in their hands.
Lastly, I'll say this much in Reggie's defense. From my experience at the game last week, and just observing what I have while watching the game on TV, I will say that the team's spirits appear to be high and the guys genuinely seem to like each other. And I think they want to come together as a team to succeed. So that's something--at least it definitely doesn't appear as though there are any locker room problems at all.