ImageImageImageImageImage

Barclays Center/Fear Prokhorov Thread

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,070
And1: 3,843
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Well the move to Brooklyn is as good as dead...... 

Post#41 » by vincecarter4pres » Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:58 pm

pistons_in_6 wrote:LBJ + nets = not even for 200million...

thats it im jumping ship its been nice being a net fan for 5 years guys...
:-?

still think we can land a big FA ???



??????

Your username is pistons in 6 and you're jumping ship because of some speculation by a shoe exec that we don't land Lebron, which, btw we all knew already anyway?!

You were never a Nets fan.

Good bye, don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 30
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

Re: Well the move to Brooklyn is as good as dead...... 

Post#42 » by NetsForce » Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:02 pm

Personally Lebron isn't the first player I want the Nets to go after in 2010 anyway... Amare is the player I want. It's another longshot, but I think he's a more realistic target given the fact that Phoenix will probably fall off hard in 2 years time and Amare won't want to waste his prime in a rebuilding effort.
Yawk5
Ballboy
Posts: 13
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 21, 2008

Re: Well the move to Brooklyn is as good as dead...... 

Post#43 » by Yawk5 » Sat Nov 22, 2008 3:41 pm

With all the moves that the Knicks are making, the chances of us landing Lebron are slim to none. But there are still plenty of other real good FA's out there. Paul Pierce, Josh Howard, Dirk Nowitski, Tayshaun Prince, Jamal Crawford, Yao Ming, Kobe Bryant, Pau Gasol, D-Wade, Michael Redd, Tyson Chandler, Durant(restricted), Amare Stoudemire, Tony Parker, Chris Bosh, Caron Butler, Andrei Kirlenko. All good players that would help the Nets improve.
User avatar
lurkingobeiscity
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,263
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 15, 2004
Location: left field

Re: Well the move to Brooklyn is as good as dead...... 

Post#44 » by lurkingobeiscity » Fri Nov 28, 2008 11:17 pm

If the funding comes up short they will downsize the project, not drop it entirely. If they get the stadium done there will be opportunities for development in the future. This move is far from dead and that is all the better for the franchise.
Image
Enetric wrote:Although Brook is close....despite the fact that he may be the weirdest guy in the league. Love the voice...(one time...me and Robin were in a tickle fight...and I was like...Robin...stop teasing me...)
User avatar
jerseyjac
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,956
And1: 34
Joined: Nov 01, 2001

Re: Well the move to Brooklyn is as good as dead...... 

Post#45 » by jerseyjac » Sat Nov 29, 2008 3:53 pm

lurkingobeiscity wrote:If the funding comes up short they will downsize the project, not drop it entirely. If they get the stadium done there will be opportunities for development in the future. This move is far from dead and that is all the better for the franchise.

I agree to an extent...investors are/were looking at the total package and what he was bringing to the area besides just a new arena...

But for the franchise overall, the move would definitely better than any other alternative...though I am partial to the Nets staying in jersey...
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 30
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

Re: Well the move to Brooklyn is as good as dead...... 

Post#46 » by NetsForce » Sun Dec 7, 2008 10:48 pm

The project will still be completed. Ratner has more or less secured all of the financing he needs, and the New York state goverment isn't going to let a project as big as this fall through when it would go a long way in stimulating the local economy.
User avatar
jerseyjac
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,956
And1: 34
Joined: Nov 01, 2001

Re: Well the move to Brooklyn is as good as dead...... 

Post#47 » by jerseyjac » Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 am

NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 30
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

Re: Well the move to Brooklyn is as good as dead...... 

Post#48 » by NetsForce » Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:15 am

Pretty much what I expected even before the economy hit the ****.
VCRJKidd15
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,293
And1: 128
Joined: Mar 10, 2006

Re: Well the move to Brooklyn is as good as dead...... 

Post#49 » by VCRJKidd15 » Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:46 am

im lost so does that mean its being built or not?
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 30
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

Re: Well the move to Brooklyn is as good as dead...... 

Post#50 » by NetsForce » Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:47 am

It's being built but it's not going to be as elaborate... The design is being simplified so it costs less =]

(My guess is that we will see further reductions to other parts of the Atlantic Yards as well)
VCRJKidd15
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,293
And1: 128
Joined: Mar 10, 2006

Re: Well the move to Brooklyn is as good as dead...... 

Post#51 » by VCRJKidd15 » Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:46 am

well as long as we get a damn arena in Brooklyn
User avatar
Burberry_HK
Junior
Posts: 370
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 25, 2007

Re: Well the move to Brooklyn is as good as dead...... 

Post#52 » by Burberry_HK » Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:22 am

hoorah for the jurassic swamp
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,070
And1: 3,843
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Well the move to Brooklyn is as good as dead...... 

Post#53 » by vincecarter4pres » Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:43 pm

Burberry_HK wrote:hoorah for the jurassic swamp

:lol:
I lol'ed.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,070
And1: 3,843
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Well the move to Brooklyn is as good as dead...... 

Post#54 » by vincecarter4pres » Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:46 pm

VCRJKidd15 wrote:im lost so does that mean its being built or not?

IMO it's going down in flames.
I highly doubt it is ever built.
My guess is yhe team will be sold as soon as Ratner's stock goes bak up some and stabilizes.
Even though the team continually hemmorages money and profit it is probably one of the most reliable assets Ratner currently owns.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Preludepunk27
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,650
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 26, 2005
Location: New Hampshire

Re: Well the move to Brooklyn is as good as dead...... 

Post#55 » by Preludepunk27 » Mon Jan 12, 2009 5:12 pm

vincecarter4pres wrote:
VCRJKidd15 wrote:im lost so does that mean its being built or not?

IMO it's going down in flames.
I highly doubt it is ever built.
My guess is yhe team will be sold as soon as Ratner's stock goes bak up some and stabilizes.
Even though the team continually hemmorages money and profit it is probably one of the most reliable assets Ratner currently owns.


I'm starting to seriously doubt this thing gets done either. I can possibly see Ratner putting the team up for sale as soon as the end of this year personally. A lot of guys in his ownership group bought into it for the sole reason of moving them to brooklyn. The whole complex was going to turn that part of brooklyn around which puts a nice amount of coin in the owners pockets. If it doesn't get done, I really think they'll just cut their loses.

Only problem here is, with whoever buys them, if they can't make this team a title contender within a season or two of purchasing it, they're gonna lose money, just like every other damn owner of this franchise. I think that's going to scare off a lot of potential area buyers. My gut reaction here is this: If Ratner puts the team up for sale, the Nets are moving away from us. Either Seattle or Vegas (extreme long shot after the all-star game debacle) are the destinations I think they'll land in. The only problem I could foresee there is that both those destinations would put the team in the western conference...but I don't see any cities in the east that could use/want a team and would actually make money there.

I'm rambling, but these are just some of the thoughts that have gone through my head lately.
Image
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,070
And1: 3,843
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Well the move to Brooklyn is as good as dead...... 

Post#56 » by vincecarter4pres » Mon Jan 12, 2009 5:40 pm

I could see a city like St. Louis, maybe somewhere in Virginia or even Nashville.
I sure hope not.
Bring em to Brick City.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
User avatar
Trueblood
Sophomore
Posts: 196
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 10, 2005
Location: All over this great country

Re: Well the move to Brooklyn is as good as dead...... 

Post#57 » by Trueblood » Tue Jan 13, 2009 3:58 am

Nah, I see them staying in the metro area and going to the Rock or renovating IZOD. Still, an Izod renovation will cost over $300 million. Why do that when you have a perfectly good arena in downtown Newark?

Forget St. Louis. They are already oversaturated with 3 teams. Newark is a good option because as long as you're in the metro area, you'll get good corporate sponsor money as well as big time broadcast revenue.
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,070
And1: 3,843
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Well the move to Brooklyn is as good as dead...... 

Post#58 » by vincecarter4pres » Tue Jan 13, 2009 5:10 am

Trueblood wrote:Nah, I see them staying in the metro area and going to the Rock or renovating IZOD. Still, an Izod renovation will cost over $300 million. Why do that when you have a perfectly good arena in downtown Newark?

Forget St. Louis. They are already oversaturated with 3 teams. Newark is a good option because as long as you're in the metro area, you'll get good corporate sponsor money as well as big time broadcast revenue.

I agree, let's just hop Ratner or whoever winds up with the team agrees.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Preludepunk27
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,650
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 26, 2005
Location: New Hampshire

Re: Well the move to Brooklyn is as good as dead...... 

Post#59 » by Preludepunk27 » Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:17 pm

Trueblood wrote:Nah, I see them staying in the metro area and going to the Rock or renovating IZOD. Still, an Izod renovation will cost over $300 million. Why do that when you have a perfectly good arena in downtown Newark?

Forget St. Louis. They are already oversaturated with 3 teams. Newark is a good option because as long as you're in the metro area, you'll get good corporate sponsor money as well as big time broadcast revenue.


So the fact they lose 20 million a year doesn't phase you? Even with the sponsors, owners think the bottom line. We lose money at the IZOD and unless we put a team on the floor that will for 5-6 year actually be a title contender (because we still had bad attendance/lost money in our "pretender years"), we'll end up losing money in Newark as well. It's Brooklyn or bust for the Nets in this area. I honestly don't even think Brooklyn is gonna make them profitable unless we become true contenders consistantly, but it's the organizations best shot. If that falls there, I just cannot realistically see a local ownership group buying them knowing there is a more than likely chance they're just gonna lose money. Unless we got a Mark Cuban-esque owner or Ratner becomes one like him, if Brooklyn falls through, I cannot see the Nets anywhere in this area in the next few years.
Image
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 30
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

Re: Well the move to Brooklyn is as good as dead...... 

Post#60 » by NetsForce » Tue Jan 13, 2009 6:01 pm

There's no way the Nets stay at the IZOD center even if it is renovated... No freaking way, look "fans" in the area have already been alienated by the move, it's Brooklyn or bust... And I don't even want to think about what the "bust" option fully entails...

Return to Brooklyn Nets