ImageImage

[Game 64] Memphis @ Houston

Moderators: ken6199, TMU

User avatar
MaxRider
RealGM
Posts: 44,473
And1: 5,805
Joined: Jun 08, 2005
Location: Choke City
 

Re: [Game 64] Memphis @ Houston 

Post#81 » by MaxRider » Mon Mar 9, 2009 5:09 am

Battier is 0-15 from 3pts line in the last 4 games
RazorJordan32
Banned User
Posts: 388
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 18, 2008

Re: [Game 64] Memphis @ Houston 

Post#82 » by RazorJordan32 » Mon Mar 9, 2009 5:31 am

MaxRider wrote:Battier is 0-15 from 3pts line in the last 4 games


i was mad at him for his fg% in these games but as long as he contains his player and we win than its alright


kinda cool lowry and gay switched jerseys
User avatar
HTown_TMac
General Manager
Posts: 9,060
And1: 222
Joined: Oct 08, 2005
Location: Houston, Texas.
   

Re: [Game 64] Memphis @ Houston 

Post#83 » by HTown_TMac » Mon Mar 9, 2009 6:29 am

Yo, I cringe everytime Battier shoots... Does he miss Rafer? or his Tan?
Image
www.atrilli.net <- music blog
RazorJordan32
Banned User
Posts: 388
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 18, 2008

Re: [Game 64] Memphis @ Houston 

Post#84 » by RazorJordan32 » Mon Mar 9, 2009 7:55 pm

HTown_TMac wrote:Yo, I cringe everytime Battier shoots... Does he miss Rafer? or his Tan?


He needs to go to mexico and get that tan back on
User avatar
moofs
General Manager
Posts: 8,077
And1: 537
Joined: Apr 17, 2006
Location: "if the warriors win the title this season ill tattoo their logo in my di ck" -- 000001
Contact:

Re: [Game 64] Memphis @ Houston 

Post#85 » by moofs » Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:45 pm

moofs wrote:Observations on the game:

The Grizz announcers, who weren't bad, dismissed the loss to the Thunder as "we weren't at full strength". If we hadn't used the same excuse for the Rockets on the same level difficulty games, this would strike me as kinda sad.

The marketing on FSTennessee is pretty much the exact same as ours. Does anyone else feel cheap and gullible right now?

Gasol is apparently one of the better 4th quarter performers in the league, which says at least one of three things given that the Grizzlies, as a losing team, are going to have a higher percentage of blowouts and not-close losses,
1. This is due to his being put in more often against subs in non-critical minutes
2. His stats are inflated due to this
3. He's not as good of a player via watching and stats as he would at first appear to be (probably true, but to what degree is anyone's guess)
If any Grizz fans are reading this

Grizzlies seem to have a good core, on paper, and they seem to have it this year. Still, they don't win? My theory is that (as far as offense goes) Warrick, Mayo, and especially Gay are stat padders and/or overrated (Warrick obviously being excused from the last part). Really, the only player I like on the team as a building block would be Gasol. Mayo may eventually be good and a capable distributor, but I read about him having problems with being a team player in college as well, which doesn't look promising. I'm very glad we didn't keep Gay.

The Marines seem to be a major sponsor on their network, doesn't look good for the tennessee economy (though it's always been a poorer state, and given some of the economic woes they've had before, that's probably still a step up. Working sulfur and coal mines ain't pretty)

YaoZaii wrote:how on earth did cook ever got that contract of his?

yhaha.


Mitch Kupchak in 2006.


http://dberri.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/ ... #more-1261
http://www.wagesofwins.com/Memphis620809.html
According to this, Gasol IS the Grizzlies building block. (posted a day after my quoted post, bahahaha win)
So are Conley and Lowry... ah.. oops. Nice try anyway, Mr. Chris Wallace! Here's your cookie :)
Morey 2020.

Q:How are they experts when they're always wrong?
A:Ask a stock market analyst or your financial advisor

Return to Houston Rockets