If boozer doesn't opt out

Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS

Warspite
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 1,218
Joined: Dec 13, 2003
Location: Surprise AZ
Contact:
       

Re: If boozer doesn't opt out 

Post#21 » by Warspite » Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:58 am

I have no idea who will opt out but if the salary cap is in free fall and we are looking at a dozen FAs ahead of Boozer and Okur fighting for cap space theres a real chance they would have to take a major pay cut. Its realy a gamble to either try to be a major 09 FA or a plan B FA in 2010.

From the Pistons side a contract for either starting around 10-12 mil is the target.
HomoSapien wrote:Warspite, the greatest poster in the history of realgm.
User avatar
HeroicKennedy
General Manager
Posts: 7,757
And1: 134
Joined: Jul 12, 2007
Location: In your nightmares!

Re: If boozer doesn't opt out 

Post#22 » by HeroicKennedy » Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:54 am

The best I see Detroit offering is 5 years, $70-75 million, and even then they'd probably be reluctant. Now, considering what Bosh and Amar'e could be pushing for in 2010 (6 years, $110-120 million) it's a pretty good deal for a 20-10 player. I don't think it's worth waiting out for Bosh unless he shows a strong desire to play for Detroit, and he really hasn't said anything yet. I think he'd rather head to Texas and play in his home state than stay in the great white north. Whereas Boozer seems more concerned with money over climate (even his son's sickle cell benefits from non-tropic environments). The question becomes, does Utah match that offer? Once again, it's relatively affordable. They could just let Millsap walk and go with the All-Star. They could also turn around and work a sign and trade with Detroit, possibly landing one of their bigs and maybe the Minnesota 2nd they have (which will be 31-33). Which makes sense if they want a cheap big and a decent pick on an unguaranteed contract. It would be better than simply letting Boozer walk, because Memphis and OKC are unlikely to sign Boozer nor give up any talent to get him.
freakazoid
Banned User
Posts: 483
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 17, 2008

Re: If boozer doesn't opt out 

Post#23 » by freakazoid » Fri Mar 13, 2009 3:08 am

Umm.... Let's try a positive approach here.

Best case scenario = Nobody opts out.

Next year we pay the luxury tax. ( I know, nobody believes we will)

If this happens, it's entirely possible that we pay the luxury tax ONE year, and then keep everybody for the next year. Certain contracts will end by then.

Maybe, maybe not.

I'm not going to go into specifics right now, but this scenario is quite possible.

Before you call shananigans, please remember that almost nobody on this board believed CJ would get a decent offer, and after he did, no one believed we would match.

I have high hopes for our future in the next three years.

Call me nieve.
Sloanfeld
Banned User
Posts: 2,717
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 04, 2006
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: If boozer doesn't opt out 

Post#24 » by Sloanfeld » Fri Mar 13, 2009 3:10 am

Boozer is pissing me off again with his butterfingers. I'm starting to switch a little of my preference meeter from Boozer to Millsap. Not a lot yet though. KOC has some tough calls to make this summer.
freakazoid
Banned User
Posts: 483
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 17, 2008

Re: If boozer doesn't opt out 

Post#25 » by freakazoid » Fri Mar 13, 2009 5:28 am

Sloanfeld wrote:Boozer is pissing me off again with his butterfingers. I'm starting to switch a little of my preference meeter from Boozer to Millsap. Not a lot yet though. KOC has some tough calls to make this summer.


Really?

Big surprize considering your sucky sig.

CB is a stud. Too bad idgets like you hate on the guy. Sloanfailed.


Looking forward to your next ban.
Sloanfeld
Banned User
Posts: 2,717
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 04, 2006
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: If boozer doesn't opt out 

Post#26 » by Sloanfeld » Sat Mar 14, 2009 2:39 pm

freakazoid wrote:
Sloanfeld wrote:Boozer is pissing me off again with his butterfingers. I'm starting to switch a little of my preference meeter from Boozer to Millsap. Not a lot yet though. KOC has some tough calls to make this summer.


Really?

Big surprize considering your sucky sig.

CB is a stud. Too bad idgets like you hate on the guy. Sloanfailed.


Looking forward to your next ban.


You're a tool. I wasn't the one claiming he was faking injuries. I back C-Booze 100%.
User avatar
Soul Patch
RealGM
Posts: 21,263
And1: 948
Joined: Jun 16, 2008
Location: I'm at the White Castle
Contact:

Re: If boozer doesn't opt out 

Post#27 » by Soul Patch » Sat Mar 14, 2009 5:28 pm

I thought Memo had an early termination clause so he if he opts out he's a UFA
Jugs wrote:Fark orf slet kent dome wuote ujquote exp
User avatar
Jazzman20
Senior
Posts: 623
And1: 4
Joined: Jul 18, 2003
Contact:

Re: If boozer doesn't opt out 

Post#28 » by Jazzman20 » Sat Mar 14, 2009 8:33 pm

I hope Boozer opts out, signs with Detroit or Houston, and breaks his leg in half. That is all.
"I think the team that wins Game 5 will win the series. Unless we lose Game 5."
- Charles Barkley
User avatar
HeroicKennedy
General Manager
Posts: 7,757
And1: 134
Joined: Jul 12, 2007
Location: In your nightmares!

Re: If boozer doesn't opt out 

Post#29 » by HeroicKennedy » Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:53 am

Jazzman20 wrote:I hope Boozer opts out, signs with Detroit or Houston, and breaks his leg in half. That is all.

My my. That's very nice of you.
freakazoid
Banned User
Posts: 483
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 17, 2008

Re: If boozer doesn't opt out 

Post#30 » by freakazoid » Sat Mar 21, 2009 2:48 am

Jazzman20 wrote:That is all.


Promise?
drivewayball
Suspended
Posts: 1,443
And1: 68
Joined: Dec 03, 2008

Re: If boozer doesn't opt out 

Post#31 » by drivewayball » Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:02 pm

Until the last week, I never even considered the possibility of Boozer staying around for the final year of his contract. All the sudden, I'm thinking that it is very likely that he will.

His play is just not nearly as sharp as it was prior to his injury and I don't believe any team would opt to give him a signicant contract based on what I'm seeing. This is unfortunate because I think the Jazz would like to see him opt out in order to solve some money problems.

Right now, I think Okur is the one who could land a five-year $55 million deal with another team after this season.
Jig-Saw Puzzle
Sophomore
Posts: 179
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 23, 2006

Re: If boozer doesn't opt out 

Post#32 » by Jig-Saw Puzzle » Sat Mar 21, 2009 10:01 pm

Boozer has to opt out, or the Jazz will be up **** creek without a paddle. There has to be some idiot GM out there willing to overpay him looking at his numbers. The Jazz can live and even thrive without Boozer if everybody is healthy.

Return to Utah Jazz