ImageImageImage

OT: John Wall charged in break-in

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Jonathan Watters
Banned User
Posts: 1,159
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 07, 2005

Re: OT: John Wall charged in break-in 

Post#121 » by Jonathan Watters » Wed May 6, 2009 11:52 pm

"Corey Brewer was drafted by the Timberwolves and bears a slight resemblance to Scottie Pippen so I think he's going to be a poor man's Scottie Pippen and anybody who thinks he is a bust is over the top" is in no way, shape or form an argument. It never will be.

You cheapen the abortion issue by trying to compare the two.
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

Re: OT: John Wall charged in break-in 

Post#122 » by deeney0 » Thu May 7, 2009 12:45 am

I may be cheapening it (how dare I try to make a point about basketball discussion on a basketball discussion message board), but I find it hard to believe you can't see the hypocritical corner your painted yourself into with your original comment.
Jonathan Watters
Banned User
Posts: 1,159
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 07, 2005

Re: OT: John Wall charged in break-in 

Post#123 » by Jonathan Watters » Thu May 7, 2009 12:58 am

I did no such thing. There is speculative debate about a basketball player, one that I know if given 100 outcomes, I'll win way more than 50. In which I acknowledge at all times the outside chance I could be wrong.

Then there is a legitimately difficult issue, one that doesn't have an answer. That has support on both sides.

How a person can't see the other side of that one is usually determined by political bias. And these people are sheep...
User avatar
big3_8_19_21
RealGM
Posts: 12,113
And1: 421
Joined: Jan 17, 2005

Re: OT: John Wall charged in break-in 

Post#124 » by big3_8_19_21 » Thu May 7, 2009 1:18 am

deeney0 wrote:We will see a medical solution that eliminates the ethical dilemmas of abortion within our lifetimes, I have no doubt. Non-invasive surgery to remove the fetus at any point in the pregnancy, insert the fetus into an artificial uterus, the child is put up for adoption, voila. It's not terribly far fetched; it's 50 years away at most.


I think that seems scientifically possible, but the monetary cost would be huge. I wish people WOULD do that, but in a money-driven world...I guess I shouldn't say it won't happen. I think it could, but it just won't be very common due to the cost.
Thriving on mediocrity since '89.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: OT: John Wall charged in break-in 

Post#125 » by Krapinsky » Thu May 7, 2009 1:42 am

Jonathan Watters wrote:I did no such thing. There is speculative debate about a basketball player, one that I know if given 100 outcomes, I'll win way more than 50. In which I acknowledge at all times the outside chance I could be wrong.

Then there is a legitimately difficult issue, one that doesn't have an answer. That has support on both sides.

How a person can't see the other side of that one is usually determined by political bias. And these people are sheep...


You are the most pretentious person on the internet.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

Re: OT: John Wall charged in break-in 

Post#126 » by deeney0 » Thu May 7, 2009 2:17 am

big3_8_19_21 wrote:
deeney0 wrote:We will see a medical solution that eliminates the ethical dilemmas of abortion within our lifetimes, I have no doubt. Non-invasive surgery to remove the fetus at any point in the pregnancy, insert the fetus into an artificial uterus, the child is put up for adoption, voila. It's not terribly far fetched; it's 50 years away at most.


I think that seems scientifically possible, but the monetary cost would be huge. I wish people WOULD do that, but in a money-driven world...I guess I shouldn't say it won't happen. I think it could, but it just won't be very common due to the cost.


Speaking of money, I think if pro-lifers really were just concerned about the life of the child, they'd get together, pool their money, and offer women $100,000, $200,000 to bring the child to term and give it up for adoption. It may be dirty and acrid but it would accomplish their goal to at least some extent.

Medical innovations are always outrageously expensive at first. Time will bring down the cost. I just saw an amazing lecture on artificial tissue/organ growth, it really put into perspective for me that artificially grown organs aren't much more than a decade away.

There are basketball applications too. Artificially grown cartilage already exists for things like noses and ears, but it's not quite ready for load bearing applications like knees - but it will be soon. Huge implication for things like microfracture.
User avatar
TheFranchise21
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,518
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 14, 2001
Location: All Day
Contact:

Re: OT: John Wall charged in break-in 

Post#127 » by TheFranchise21 » Thu May 7, 2009 5:23 am

deeney0 wrote:
big3_8_19_21 wrote:
deeney0 wrote:We will see a medical solution that eliminates the ethical dilemmas of abortion within our lifetimes, I have no doubt. Non-invasive surgery to remove the fetus at any point in the pregnancy, insert the fetus into an artificial uterus, the child is put up for adoption, voila. It's not terribly far fetched; it's 50 years away at most.


I think that seems scientifically possible, but the monetary cost would be huge. I wish people WOULD do that, but in a money-driven world...I guess I shouldn't say it won't happen. I think it could, but it just won't be very common due to the cost.


Speaking of money, I think if pro-lifers really were just concerned about the life of the child, they'd get together, pool their money, and offer women $100,000, $200,000 to bring the child to term and give it up for adoption. It may be dirty and acrid but it would accomplish their goal to at least some extent.

Medical innovations are always outrageously expensive at first. Time will bring down the cost. I just saw an amazing lecture on artificial tissue/organ growth, it really put into perspective for me that artificially grown organs aren't much more than a decade away.

There are basketball applications too. Artificially grown cartilage already exists for things like noses and ears, but it's not quite ready for load bearing applications like knees - but it will be soon. Huge implication for things like microfracture.

That's so wrong.
My Kobe Bryant website I designed myself: http://personal.stthomas.edu/dnnguyen/kb24.
Jonathan Watters
Banned User
Posts: 1,159
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 07, 2005

Re: OT: John Wall charged in break-in 

Post#128 » by Jonathan Watters » Thu May 7, 2009 5:25 am

Dr.Krapinsky wrote:
You are the most pretentious person on the internet.


The entire internet?

And people who base their views on the killing of unborn babies on what political ideology they decided to follow are still douchebag sheep.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: OT: John Wall charged in break-in 

Post#129 » by Krapinsky » Thu May 7, 2009 5:44 am

Jonathan Watters wrote:
Dr.Krapinsky wrote:
You are the most pretentious person on the internet.


The entire internet?

And people who base their views on the killing of unborn babies on what political ideology they decided to follow are still douchebag sheep.


Maybe I exaggerated a little. On second thought you're second to that Maddox guy, the best page in the universe or whatever.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Jonathan Watters
Banned User
Posts: 1,159
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 07, 2005

Re: OT: John Wall charged in break-in 

Post#130 » by Jonathan Watters » Thu May 7, 2009 5:50 am

Dr.Krapinsky wrote:
Jonathan Watters wrote:
Dr.Krapinsky wrote:
You are the most pretentious person on the internet.


The entire internet?

And people who base their views on the killing of unborn babies on what political ideology they decided to follow are still douchebag sheep.


Maybe I exaggerated a little. On second thought you're second to that Maddox guy, the best page in the universe or whatever.


What does pretentious mean?
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: OT: John Wall charged in break-in 

Post#131 » by Krapinsky » Thu May 7, 2009 6:06 am

It means your self proclaimed greatness -- your I'm better than everybody else mantra -- is unjustified by any basis in reality.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Jonathan Watters
Banned User
Posts: 1,159
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 07, 2005

Re: OT: John Wall charged in break-in 

Post#132 » by Jonathan Watters » Thu May 7, 2009 6:10 am

Dr.Krapinsky wrote:It means your self proclaimed greatness -- your I'm better than everybody else mantra -- is unjustified by any basis in reality.


Thanks.

I think your calling me pretentious is pretentious.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: OT: John Wall charged in break-in 

Post#133 » by Krapinsky » Thu May 7, 2009 6:33 am

Jonathan Watters wrote:
Dr.Krapinsky wrote:It means your self proclaimed greatness -- your I'm better than everybody else mantra -- is unjustified by any basis in reality.


Thanks.

I think your calling me pretentious is pretentious.


Touche'
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
GopherIt!
RealGM
Posts: 10,599
And1: 24,742
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Location: bird watching
Contact:

Re: OT: John Wall charged in break-in 

Post#134 » by GopherIt! » Fri May 8, 2009 1:09 am

cpfsf wrote:I hate you all

My last two threads have been hijacked by both abortion and Da Vinci debates.


DaVinci debate? that sounds interesting. I have to go find that one.
Shrunk
Banned User
Posts: 62
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 10, 2008

Re: OT: John Wall charged in break-in 

Post#135 » by Shrunk » Wed Mar 3, 2010 10:08 pm

revprodeji wrote:Either you have no sense of humor or you are just an idiot. Equating Anti-abortion with pro-rape might be the stupidest thing I have read.

This is Jon at his finest-we will miss you.
dunkonu21
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,299
And1: 40
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Location: An Igloo
   

Re: OT: John Wall charged in break-in 

Post#136 » by dunkonu21 » Wed Mar 3, 2010 11:09 pm

Shrunk, at least Rev will leave on his own will. Ur just going to get suspended for being a dick.
User avatar
hijacktheparade
Starter
Posts: 2,439
And1: 4
Joined: Jul 02, 2008

Re: OT: John Wall charged in break-in 

Post#137 » by hijacktheparade » Wed Mar 3, 2010 11:12 pm

Why the **** was this bumped?
User avatar
Basti
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,610
And1: 3,845
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: Æ ha en ståkukk!
   

Re: OT: John Wall charged in break-in 

Post#138 » by Basti » Thu Mar 4, 2010 12:20 am

how is Shrunk not banned yet?
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,761
And1: 22,339
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: OT: John Wall charged in break-in 

Post#139 » by Klomp » Thu Mar 4, 2010 12:56 am

Shrunk wrote:This is Jon at his finest-we will miss you.


Classy post.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves