ImageImageImageImageImage

2009 June Draft Thread: SF has Pick #6

GswStorm3
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,785
And1: 326
Joined: Sep 19, 2007
Location: NorCal
       

2009 June Draft Thread: SF has Pick #6 

Post#1 » by GswStorm3 » Thu May 21, 2009 7:46 pm

This is a weak hitting draft compared to last year, but we can still land a nice player.

Tyler Matzek, Alex White and Zach Wheeler could be our top pitching targets. Grant Green and Donovan Tate could be our top position targets.
GS Warriors 1
General Manager
Posts: 8,522
And1: 480
Joined: May 23, 2004
       

Re: 2009 June Draft Thread: SF has Pick #6 

Post#2 » by GS Warriors 1 » Fri May 22, 2009 10:20 pm

High School Pitcher.
Hopper15
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,969
And1: 274
Joined: Mar 20, 2003
Location: Tried like the dickens

Re: 2009 June Draft Thread: SF has Pick #6 

Post#3 » by Hopper15 » Sun May 24, 2009 5:08 pm

Smells like another SP to me, too.
User avatar
TheLowlySquire
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,424
And1: 1,345
Joined: Aug 28, 2008
     

Re: 2009 June Draft Thread: SF has Pick #6 

Post#4 » by TheLowlySquire » Mon May 25, 2009 11:10 pm

I think the Giants should get a hitter. Then again, I know nothing about the draft prospects this year.
opzoneworld
Junior
Posts: 375
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 17, 2005

Re: 2009 June Draft Thread: SF has Pick #6 

Post#5 » by opzoneworld » Fri Jun 5, 2009 12:04 am

I said it before the season started and I am going to continue to stick to it. The Giants will select Donovan Tate at #6 to be their CF of the future. Best HS player in the draft.
GswStorm3
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,785
And1: 326
Joined: Sep 19, 2007
Location: NorCal
       

Re: 2009 June Draft Thread: SF has Pick #6 

Post#6 » by GswStorm3 » Fri Jun 5, 2009 7:33 pm

I have a feeling we're also leaning towards a pitcher.
opzoneworld
Junior
Posts: 375
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 17, 2005

Re: 2009 June Draft Thread: SF has Pick #6 

Post#7 » by opzoneworld » Sat Jun 6, 2009 1:43 am

I believe we are too but the lack of a CF prospect to take over for AR scares me. I mean WF has been a total bust, if you can say bust this early, so far. Who else would you feel comfortable turning over CF to?

Plus, how can the potential OF of Kieschnick in LF, Tate in CF and the young international stud Rodriguez in RF not get as excited as prom night?
GS Warriors 1
General Manager
Posts: 8,522
And1: 480
Joined: May 23, 2004
       

Re: 2009 June Draft Thread: SF has Pick #6 

Post#8 » by GS Warriors 1 » Sun Jun 7, 2009 5:36 am

opzoneworld wrote:I believe we are too but the lack of a CF prospect to take over for AR scares me. I mean WF has been a total bust, if you can say bust this early, so far. Who else would you feel comfortable turning over CF to?


Way too early to think about Rowand's replacement. It could be Fairley, could be someone who is not on the roster. The draft isn't about need, its about taking the best talent available and the consensus seems to be that the pitching is strong at the top. I think Tate takes a bit of a dip due to other future commitments and signing bonus money.
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,582
And1: 18,838
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: 2009 June Draft Thread: SF has Pick #6 

Post#9 » by Stanford » Tue Jun 9, 2009 1:21 am

I want Grant Green, just because of his name
opzoneworld
Junior
Posts: 375
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 17, 2005

Re: 2009 June Draft Thread: SF has Pick #6 

Post#10 » by opzoneworld » Tue Jun 9, 2009 1:44 am

The Giants have proven the last handful of years not to care about a signing bonus. Look at what they have done via international prospects and Posey last year. Not to mention they are considered the favorite for one of top 3 international players this year as well so I dont believe money will play into their thinking at all.

In my opinion, I dont see any difference between Matzek, Wheeler or Tate. All three have the potential to be longtime all-stars. As such, I think you look at what your system has vs what it does not have. There is a lot of pitching depth and very little OF depth. Therefore, I would go with Tate.

I would be more than happy with any of the three though.
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,582
And1: 18,838
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: 2009 June Draft Thread: SF has Pick #6 

Post#11 » by Stanford » Tue Jun 9, 2009 10:48 pm

*Like the Wheeler pick
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,582
And1: 18,838
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: 2009 June Draft Thread: SF has Pick #6 

Post#12 » by Stanford » Wed Jun 10, 2009 2:18 am

Tommy Joseph looks like he's got some power. We could always move him to first. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxK5XAlU ... p%3A%2F%2F -> 2:25
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,582
And1: 18,838
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: 2009 June Draft Thread: SF has Pick #6 

Post#13 » by Stanford » Wed Jun 10, 2009 2:27 am

And more power with Chris Dominguez in the third
GswStorm3
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,785
And1: 326
Joined: Sep 19, 2007
Location: NorCal
       

Re: 2009 June Draft Thread: SF has Pick #6 

Post#14 » by GswStorm3 » Wed Jun 10, 2009 4:29 am

No complaints with that first day.
darobster17
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,652
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 16, 2005

Re: 2009 June Draft Thread: SF has Pick #6 

Post#15 » by darobster17 » Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:18 am

So there you have it...We got Zach Wheeler. Why the hell did we take a catcher in the next round??? when we clearly need a player with a big bat that can play multiple positions???
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,582
And1: 18,838
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: 2009 June Draft Thread: SF has Pick #6 

Post#16 » by Stanford » Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:25 am

Joseph can play first. We needed power at the corners and we got it.

Let the Zach/Zack confusion begin!
opzoneworld
Junior
Posts: 375
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 17, 2005

Re: 2009 June Draft Thread: SF has Pick #6 

Post#17 » by opzoneworld » Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:56 pm

Love the pick.

I think this means Alderson is gone though. The potential of a Lin, Mad, Cain, Wheeler and throw in a rec league softball pitcher at #5 you still have the best staff is baseball. Plus, no way the Giants could afford all five long-term as all are potential 1 or 2's in any rotation. Cant trade Lin or Mad and no way I would deal Cain so that just leaves Alderson.

I would package Sanchez and Alderson and go get one of the top 5 players between the ages of 25 and 29. In my opinion, we now have one of the best packages to offer for a big bat. What about something like Sanchez and Alderson for Adam Jones of Baltimore?

And the catcher in the second round, he only caught for one year. They drafted his bat. You can find another position for him with that bat.
GswStorm3
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,785
And1: 326
Joined: Sep 19, 2007
Location: NorCal
       

Re: 2009 June Draft Thread: SF has Pick #6 

Post#18 » by GswStorm3 » Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:44 pm

No way I'm trading Alderson. The most we should offer for a bat is Sosa and Sanchez.
opzoneworld
Junior
Posts: 375
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 17, 2005

Re: 2009 June Draft Thread: SF has Pick #6 

Post#19 » by opzoneworld » Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:59 pm

You want a bat you have to give up something. If anything, Sanchez has lost value this year. He has been very average at best. You are going to have to give up one blue chip to get anything of value back. The one place where we have a blue chip to spare is SP. You aren't going to trade Lin, Cain or Mad. That leaves Alderson and Wheeler. You cant trade Wheeler because he is an unproven commodity. So you are left with Alderson.

Look at what Atlanta had to give to up to Pit for a marginal talent. If we want real talent, we have to give up Alderson.
GswStorm3
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,785
And1: 326
Joined: Sep 19, 2007
Location: NorCal
       

Re: 2009 June Draft Thread: SF has Pick #6 

Post#20 » by GswStorm3 » Wed Jun 10, 2009 6:43 pm

If Sanchez and Sosa isn't enough to offer, then we don't need to make a trade.

Return to San Francisco Giants