What can Micheal Beasley get?

quazi31 · Post #1 » by **quazi31** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 12:13 am

Hey Miami Heat fan here and im wondering what can the heat get from you guys for Micheal Beasley?? Keep in mind Miami needs a 2nd scorer and a low post scorer and try to get 2010 involved but doesnt have to be.

Post #2 » by **Walt Cronkite** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 12:22 am

12 + Wallace or Diaw + 2nd rounders is the best I can come up with without really putting too much thought into it.

quazi31 · Post #3 » by **quazi31** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 12:24 am

Walt Cronkite wrote:12 + Wallace or Diaw + 2nd rounders is the best I can come up with without really putting too much thought into it.

hmmm defentily have to have wallace or okafor....what else wuld miami have to add for you guys to add wallace and okafor besides giving up wade

Post #4 » by **Walt Cronkite** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 12:39 am

Okafor is neither a 2nd scorer or low post scorer, that's why I didn't mention him. I'll edit or reply with a Wallace deal.

edit: Actually, won't you guys have cap space this offseason? Beasley for Wallace straight up would work for me, but to include the picks I guess Wallace + 12, 40 and 54 for Beasley and Jones or Haslem.

quazi31 · Post #5 » by **quazi31** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 12:44 am

Walt Cronkite wrote:Okafor is neither a 2nd scorer or low post scorer, that's why I didn't mention him. I'll edit or reply with a Wallace deal.

edit: Actually, won't you guys have cap space this offseason? Beasley for Wallace straight up would work for me, but to include the picks I guess Wallace + 12, 40 and 54 for Beasley and Jones or Haslem.

we did but trading it for o'neal and beasley has more value than wallace and 12 i would think

BeesWax · Post #6 » by **BeesWax** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 12:45 am

I would say something like

Wallace, #12 for Jones, Beasley

Basically we take Jones' bad contract off your hands and give you a good player at 12 where you could try to draft that low post scorer.

Post #7 » by **Walt Cronkite** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 12:47 am

quazi31 wrote:
Walt Cronkite wrote:Okafor is neither a 2nd scorer or low post scorer, that's why I didn't mention him. I'll edit or reply with a Wallace deal.

edit: Actually, won't you guys have cap space this offseason? Beasley for Wallace straight up would work for me, but to include the picks I guess Wallace + 12, 40 and 54 for Beasley and Jones or Haslem.

we did but trading it for o'neal and beasley has more value than wallace and 12 i would think

Sure... to be honest though, I don't see why you'd move Beasley at all if you're hoping to get a 2nd scorer and/or low post threat... isn't he supposed to be both of those things?

BeesWax · Post #8 » by **BeesWax** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:08 am

Maybe include Augustine somehow?

Wallace, Augustine, 12

for

Beasley, Jones, Chalmers

Just a thought.

quazi31 · Post #9 » by **quazi31** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:26 am

jdm3 wrote:Maybe include Augustine somehow?

Wallace, Augustine, 12

for

Beasley, Jones, Chalmers

Just a thought.

ummmm idk who i would rather have chalmers or augestine because chalmers is better on d and also yea he could be but they are trying to move him to sf and he cant play d so yea

Fred Williamson · Post #10 » by **Fred Williamson** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 7:38 am

Why do you guys want Beasley?

Beasley is not a Small Forward, and we already have Diaw. This means, I would rather trade Diaw for Beasley, instead of Wallace.

But honestly, i'm not that high on trading our core. We should keep this group together and just add more depth.

How about Radman+12+Augustin for Chalmers+Cook+Jones ?

doc.end · Post #11 » by **doc.end** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 10:39 am

Uhm, i would rather have Crash tahn Beasley.

Fred Williamson · Post #12 » by **Fred Williamson** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 11:01 am

me too.

Wallace is the only guy on our team who can drive to the rim at will, and i'm not willing to give him up for an unproven jump shooting tweener.

Post #13 » by **Walt Cronkite** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 4:29 pm

I don't specifically WANT Beasley. Isn't the thread title "What can Micheal Beasley get?"

Post #14 » by **BigSlam** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:04 pm

Walt Cronkite wrote:Isn't the thread title "What can Micheal Beasley get?"

Then the answer should be:

"Several ounces of the finest green weed ever to touch your lips in the blink of a phone call."

Post #15 » by **Walt Cronkite** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:07 pm

Owned. I love that picture of him with all the dominoes and Chalmers is in the background holding an l. At the rookie transition program thing.

edit: ah, yes.

thruthefire · Post #16 » by **thruthefire** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:37 pm

He's so goofy-looking.

Rich4114 · Post #17 » by **Rich4114** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 7:52 pm

Beasley can score.... we need scoring.... Diaw can play SF and be an advantage at the position.... we'd be a bigger team.... we'd score more points.... we'd win more games.... Beasley for Wallace and #12 (with fill ins for salary involved) works for me

doc.end · Post #18 » by **doc.end** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 8:33 pm

Diaw needs to play a PF...

Post #19 » by **Flash3** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 10:05 pm

thruthefire wrote:He's so goofy-looking.

CoolKids · Post #20 » by **CoolKids** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 10:45 pm

Flash3 wrote:
thruthefire wrote:He's so goofy-looking.

Why?