Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
- Esohny
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,613
- And1: 339
- Joined: Apr 18, 2009
- Location: Saint Paul
-
Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
I think I read that he got the spanish IRS to majorly reduce his buyout, so him going 3 should be no issue. I will look for a link.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,286
- And1: 19,298
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
funkatron101 wrote:I don't remember what I voted.
I'm like J2J. I voted for the #2 way back when, but I don't see it that way now. If we get the chance, I'd prefer to wait to see how the #5 and #6 shook out on draft night, rather than be forced to offer more earlier by the threat of another trader.
Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
- john2jer
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,304
- And1: 452
- Joined: May 26, 2006
- Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
-
Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
shrink wrote:funkatron101 wrote:I don't remember what I voted.
I'm like J2J. I voted for the #2 way back when, but I don't see it that way now. If we get the chance, I'd prefer to wait to see how the #5 and #6 shook out on draft night, rather than be forced to offer more earlier by the threat of another trader.
Not sure if you're like me at all.

I voted to keep the #5 and #6 back then. I vote to keep them both now, unless we find a way to package #6 with #18 and small add-on like Pekovic or the Utah pick to move up to #2.
I'm not now, then, nor will ever be ok with a #5 and #6 for #2 swap unless there's a major add-on not named Gay or Conley, which means a 3 team deal.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
-
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves
- Posts: 27,329
- And1: 12,186
- Joined: Dec 27, 2003
-
Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
It's hard to say with Rubio because I've never seen him play. I wouldn't trade 5 and 6 for anyone else in this draft, but most of the time I'd rather have the best player.
Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 30,827
- And1: 8,857
- Joined: Nov 02, 2007
Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
Shox214 wrote:I don't think so. We need to beable to draft a PG and a SG on thursday.
We definitely need to fill the PG and SG spots by season's start but they both don't have to come through the draft.
Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
- RIPskaterdude
- RealGM
- Posts: 92,813
- And1: 37,037
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
- Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
-
Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
Wow, pretty interesting that you guys had a thread on this over a month ago! But anyways, before yesterday's trade, if I had approached your board and asked you to give up the 6th pick + Foye + Miller + take on some bad contracts to get Rubio, would you still say yes? Because that's essentially what you would be giving up with the 5th + 6th pick for the 2nd...

Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
-
- Junior
- Posts: 324
- And1: 28
- Joined: Dec 29, 2008
-
Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
why would we give up more just to get one player? they will stay put and grab the combination of Evans/Rubio or Evans/Curry, both of which stand to be an excellent young guard combination for years to come. I don't get the love for Derozen. If we get a small forward, Earl Clark or Austin Daye could be had later in the draft.
Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
-
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves
- Posts: 27,329
- And1: 12,186
- Joined: Dec 27, 2003
-
Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
zauchary wrote:why would we give up more just to get one player? they will stay put and grab the combination of Evans/Rubio or Evans/Curry, both of which stand to be an excellent young guard combination for years to come. I don't get the love for Derozen. If we get a small forward, Earl Clark or Austin Daye could be had later in the draft.
Super athletic player who improved over the course of the year and stepped up in the tournaments.
Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,928
- And1: 17
- Joined: Sep 22, 2007
Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
What is the story on the workout DeRozan was supposed to have? At first I thought the Wolves cancled it but then I saw in the paper that DeRozan was "sick". I wonder if he had the same sickness Thabeet had when he was supposed to workout for the Grizzlies.
Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,286
- And1: 19,298
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
john2jer wrote:shrink wrote:funkatron101 wrote:I don't remember what I voted.
I'm like J2J. I voted for the #2 way back when, but I don't see it that way now. If we get the chance, I'd prefer to wait to see how the #5 and #6 shook out on draft night, rather than be forced to offer more earlier by the threat of another trader.
Not sure if you're like me at all. :-(
I voted to keep the #5 and #6 back then. I vote to keep them both now...
Oops I meant Winter Wonder (anyone else reading way too many posts today?)
I'm not like you. You had it right to begin with.
Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,198
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 02, 2008
-
Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
shrink wrote:
Oops I meant Winter Wonder (anyone else reading way too many posts today?)
I'm not like you. You had it right to begin with.
Ouch, that means he is saying that I was wrong. Sigh. It hurts, it hurts more from one who is pretty much the trade/valuation guru of our board, and it hurts most from another who enjoyed the Firefly series.
If you need me I will be in the corner with my mis-evaluations (though I still think they were correct for the time) ...
Otherwise, yes, read too much, posted far more than my norm, and still just can't wait for the draft results. Then we can have more trade talk fun on what actually did and did not happen.
Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
- john2jer
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,304
- And1: 452
- Joined: May 26, 2006
- Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
-
Re: Simple Value Question #5 + #6 or #2
I've read and typed way too much today and last night. It's the end of the month, my busy time at work. This isn't good for me getting my crap done. DAMN YOU KAHN!!!
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves