ImageImageImage

ALL RUBIO TALK HERE

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: ALL RUBIO TALK HERE 

Post#41 » by Esohny » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:10 am

MagnusPinus wrote:What's wrong with NY deal?? I mean, Chandler is 87 born.. he could easily be in this draft.. and he is already a pretty nice scorer and a very complete player. If u add a Lee(another terrific player), I don't see how this is a bad deal.. especially considering u get the fifth for Foye, who is not a phenom at all


Chandler is so-so. Lee is solid, but doesn't fit here at all. He isn't better than Jefferson or Love, and will cost a ton. This is what's wrong with the NY deal. I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you aren't trolling.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: ALL RUBIO TALK HERE 

Post#42 » by Krapinsky » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:11 am

MagnusPinus wrote:What's wrong with NY deal?? I mean, Chandler is 87 born.. he could easily be in this draft.. and he is already a pretty nice scorer and a very complete player. If u add a Lee(another terrific player), I don't see how this is a bad deal.. especially considering u get the fifth for Foye, who is not a phenom at all


Kahn believes Rubio is a transformational -- once in a generation -- type of player. Chandler is a role player with limited upside. He would be a nice complimentary piece for a team looking for such players, but for a team looking to get out of the western conference cellar he adds little, especially when you consider Brewer and Gomes have similar abilities. Lee plays the same position as our two best players. Why would we want to commit another $10M/year to the same position? Kahn said the only thing we won't do is draft a PF. So why would he trade his favorite player in the draft for one and then give up our future cap space to pay him?
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: ALL RUBIO TALK HERE 

Post#43 » by Krapinsky » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:12 am

MagnusPinus wrote:
B Calrissian wrote:Magnus, the Foye for 5 deal has nothing to do with the value of Rubio.



Giving the situation(he doesn't want to come), the value of ricky is even lower.. minny is not in a strong position, especially because the young kid put some limitations to the places he wants to go.


This is soo far from the truth. Nothing has changed since before the draft.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
MagnusPinus
Analyst
Posts: 3,108
And1: 148
Joined: Jun 15, 2008
Location: Torino - Italia

Re: ALL RUBIO TALK HERE 

Post#44 » by MagnusPinus » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:12 am

bruceallen61 wrote:
MagnusPinus wrote:
Dr.Krapinsky wrote:Kahn, if anything, is a master negotiator. Right now he is playing it cool and keeping positive, and really he couldn't be handling this any better.

Is it weird that I'm beginning to get a man crush on Kahn? The dude is smart.


:lol: :lol: man.. he keeps saying Flynn and Rubio can play together.. and no one believes him. If this is smart.... :roll:


I honestly think they could potentially play together if Rubio can D up 2's.



First I don't think he can, but this is not the main problem.. We are talking about 2 playmakers.. ball dominant player.. none of them play off the ball, none of them can shoot well. . it is just not ideal situation.
GuyverADL wrote:
The only thing Curry will raise from the start of the season is his cholesterol.
People do not understand Curry's reason for wanting to be a ballerina. He wanted to be able to contort his body to be able to fit in the fridge.
User avatar
BrooklynBulls
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 32,734
And1: 2,655
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Avidly reading WillPenney.com
Contact:

Re: ALL RUBIO TALK HERE 

Post#45 » by BrooklynBulls » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:13 am

Wilson Chandler suckles testicles. Don't let any Knick fan tell you differently. There's streaky, there's very streaky, there's Jamal Crawford, and then there's Wilson Chandler.
MagnusPinus
Analyst
Posts: 3,108
And1: 148
Joined: Jun 15, 2008
Location: Torino - Italia

Re: ALL RUBIO TALK HERE 

Post#46 » by MagnusPinus » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:15 am

Dr.Krapinsky wrote:
MagnusPinus wrote:What's wrong with NY deal?? I mean, Chandler is 87 born.. he could easily be in this draft.. and he is already a pretty nice scorer and a very complete player. If u add a Lee(another terrific player), I don't see how this is a bad deal.. especially considering u get the fifth for Foye, who is not a phenom at all


Kahn believes Rubio is a transformational -- once in a generation -- type of player. Chandler is a role player with limited upside. He would be a nice complimentary piece for a team looking for such players, but for a team looking to get out of the western conference cellar he adds little, especially when you consider Brewer and Gomes have similar abilities. Lee plays the same position as our two best players. Why would we want to commit another $10M/year to the same position? Kahn said the only thing we won't do is draft a PF. So why would he trade his favorite player in the draft for one and then give up our future cap space to pay him?



Well, Kahn must try to sell him high. I personally think he is a once in a generation player,and for that reason I'd never have drafted Flynn as well. He could draft Derozan, even Curry is better fit since he is half SG. . Kahn just screwed it by drafting Flynn.. now he has a big problem to solve. Maybe he could draft Flynn,but who knows.
GuyverADL wrote:
The only thing Curry will raise from the start of the season is his cholesterol.
People do not understand Curry's reason for wanting to be a ballerina. He wanted to be able to contort his body to be able to fit in the fridge.
younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,752
And1: 2,585
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: ALL RUBIO TALK HERE 

Post#47 » by younggunsmn » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:18 am

MagnusPinus wrote:
B Calrissian wrote:Magnus, the Foye for 5 deal has nothing to do with the value of Rubio.



Giving the situation(he doesn't want to come), the value of ricky is even lower.. minny is not in a strong position, especially because the young kid put some limitations to the places he wants to go.


all based on not wanting to go to teams with established PG's. (mem and okc)

if he had really wanted NY from the beginning he
a. would have actually worked out for them
b. started the rubio-to-ny talk alot earlier (like post lotto).

and chandler's stats are inflated for d'antoni-ball, just like marion's were.
miller+foye was a superior deal, plus we took songalia, which you were not willing to under the lebron cap room law.

no way we take pennies on the dollar for rubio, we are in no hurry to win now.
User avatar
4ho5ive
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,034
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Location: Minnesota-Where underwhelming happens
Contact:

Re: ALL RUBIO TALK HERE 

Post#48 » by 4ho5ive » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:19 am

BrooklynBulls wrote:Wilson Chandler suckles testicles. Don't let any Knick fan tell you differently. There's streaky, there's very streaky, there's Jamal Crawford, and then there's Wilson Chandler.


:lol: Welcome to sig town, population YOU!

At least until this NY crap dies
younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,752
And1: 2,585
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: ALL RUBIO TALK HERE 

Post#49 » by younggunsmn » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:19 am

if ricky gets healthy and shows he can shoot from deep he will have MAD MAD Value, like #1 pick value.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: ALL RUBIO TALK HERE 

Post#50 » by Krapinsky » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:22 am

MagnusPinus wrote:
Dr.Krapinsky wrote:
MagnusPinus wrote:What's wrong with NY deal?? I mean, Chandler is 87 born.. he could easily be in this draft.. and he is already a pretty nice scorer and a very complete player. If u add a Lee(another terrific player), I don't see how this is a bad deal.. especially considering u get the fifth for Foye, who is not a phenom at all


Kahn believes Rubio is a transformational -- once in a generation -- type of player. Chandler is a role player with limited upside. He would be a nice complimentary piece for a team looking for such players, but for a team looking to get out of the western conference cellar he adds little, especially when you consider Brewer and Gomes have similar abilities. Lee plays the same position as our two best players. Why would we want to commit another $10M/year to the same position? Kahn said the only thing we won't do is draft a PF. So why would he trade his favorite player in the draft for one and then give up our future cap space to pay him?



Well, Kahn must try to sell him high. I personally think he is a once in a generation player,and for that reason I'd never have drafted Flynn as well. He could draft Derozan, even Curry is better fit since he is half SG. . Kahn just screwed it by drafting Flynn.. now he has a big problem to solve. Maybe he could draft Flynn,but who knows.


Well Curry didn't want to be here either. If we took him instead of Rubio my guess is we'd be hearing the same conjecture today, but with Curry going to the Knicks instead. Flynn, on the other hand, apparently loves MN. Flynn also has great potential defending the PG position while Curry is going to be a liability defending 1's or 2's, so at least an argument can be made that defensively we are better off with Flynn and Rubio.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: ALL RUBIO TALK HERE 

Post#51 » by Esohny » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:22 am

4ho5ive wrote:
BrooklynBulls wrote:Wilson Chandler suckles testicles. Don't let any Knick fan tell you differently. There's streaky, there's very streaky, there's Jamal Crawford, and then there's Wilson Chandler.


:lol: Welcome to sig town, population YOU!

At least until this NY crap dies


I hate to be a copycat, but me too. My annoyance from reading the Trade Board is too high not to.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: ALL RUBIO TALK HERE 

Post#52 » by Krapinsky » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:22 am

4ho5ive wrote:
BrooklynBulls wrote:Wilson Chandler suckles testicles. Don't let any Knick fan tell you differently. There's streaky, there's very streaky, there's Jamal Crawford, and then there's Wilson Chandler.


:lol: Welcome to sig town, population YOU!

At least until this NY crap dies


hahahah

Count me in too
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
BrooklynBulls
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 32,734
And1: 2,655
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Avidly reading WillPenney.com
Contact:

Re: ALL RUBIO TALK HERE 

Post#53 » by BrooklynBulls » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:24 am

Glad I could be of assistance.
User avatar
big3_8_19_21
RealGM
Posts: 12,113
And1: 421
Joined: Jan 17, 2005

Re: ALL RUBIO TALK HERE 

Post#54 » by big3_8_19_21 » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:28 am

That was a pretty classic post, I'm so sick of "OMG WILSON CHANDLER IS SOOO WORTH RICKY RUBIO YOU IDIOT MIDWESTERNERS DON'T UNDERSTAND SMARTNESS!!!!!@!!!$!!!" I immediately thought "sig" when I saw it as well...then I saw everyone else sig-ing it. I guess I'll join the crew.
Thriving on mediocrity since '89.
Gus McCrae
General Manager
Posts: 8,263
And1: 2,069
Joined: Dec 07, 2007
     

Re: ALL RUBIO TALK HERE 

Post#55 » by Gus McCrae » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:30 am

Question: would you guys trade Rubio for Andrew Bynum?

disclaimer to other laker fans: I'm not saying I would, but I'd listen.
User avatar
BrooklynBulls
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 32,734
And1: 2,655
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Avidly reading WillPenney.com
Contact:

Re: ALL RUBIO TALK HERE 

Post#56 » by BrooklynBulls » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:30 am

Jesus, I hope the angry Knick fans won't find out where I live...

Oh crap my username.
younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,752
And1: 2,585
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: ALL RUBIO TALK HERE 

Post#57 » by younggunsmn » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:35 am

SoCAL24 wrote:Question: would you guys trade Rubio for Andrew Bynum?

disclaimer to other laker fans: I'm not saying I would, but I'd listen.


no, but not for lack of value.

1. not enough minutes for al, love, bynum
2. too many injuries
MagnusPinus
Analyst
Posts: 3,108
And1: 148
Joined: Jun 15, 2008
Location: Torino - Italia

Re: ALL RUBIO TALK HERE 

Post#58 » by MagnusPinus » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:35 am

BrooklynBulls wrote:Jesus, I hope the angry Knick fans won't find out where I live...

Oh crap my username.



I'll be here to laugh when mister rubio gets traded. I think this has lost any logical sense..now you want to keep rubio at all cost.. saying he can stay in europe 2 years.. everybody is crazy.

Imagine any other 5th pick not playing for 2 years.. that would be insane. It looks like Rubio now has Kobe BRyant type of value.
GuyverADL wrote:
The only thing Curry will raise from the start of the season is his cholesterol.
People do not understand Curry's reason for wanting to be a ballerina. He wanted to be able to contort his body to be able to fit in the fridge.
Gus McCrae
General Manager
Posts: 8,263
And1: 2,069
Joined: Dec 07, 2007
     

Re: ALL RUBIO TALK HERE 

Post#59 » by Gus McCrae » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:35 am

Brooklyn Bulls and DR. Krapinksy, are you guys friends or something? You both joined RealGM on exact same day.
MagnusPinus
Analyst
Posts: 3,108
And1: 148
Joined: Jun 15, 2008
Location: Torino - Italia

Re: ALL RUBIO TALK HERE 

Post#60 » by MagnusPinus » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:36 am

younggunsmn wrote:
SoCAL24 wrote:Question: would you guys trade Rubio for Andrew Bynum?

disclaimer to other laker fans: I'm not saying I would, but I'd listen.


no, but not for lack of value.

1. not enough minutes for al, love, bynum
2. too many injuries



Bynum, Vujacic, Farmar and picks for Rubio, Love and expirings
GuyverADL wrote:
The only thing Curry will raise from the start of the season is his cholesterol.
People do not understand Curry's reason for wanting to be a ballerina. He wanted to be able to contort his body to be able to fit in the fridge.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves