J-Roc wrote: Keep Halladay. Let him walk if he so chooses after 2010.
Stupidest thing you could do.
Moderator: JaysRule15
J-Roc wrote: Keep Halladay. Let him walk if he so chooses after 2010.
J-Roc wrote:Wilner said he thinks there could be 4 or 5 teams interested in Wells, where they wouldn't insist on us paying half his salary. If that's true, I say the Jays explore it.
The concern is although we were supposed to contend next year, that was because our pitching would suck. But actually, our pitching hasn't been too bad, even with the injuries. On offense, there are these guys having career years that we can't really count on for next year. Scutario, Rolen. Can we really count on Overbay for a whole other season?
One angle is for the Jays to spend some money and get some more punch in the lineup. This lineup desperately needs a power hitter. Another angle is to blow it up. I don't see how we can go into next year just thinking some added pitching will make a difference.
-MetA4- wrote:J-Roc wrote: Keep Halladay. Let him walk if he so chooses after 2010.
Stupidest thing you could do.
LittleOzzy wrote:I don't think a complete rebuild is the answer.
Getting rid of Wells and Rios would be nice to try and bring in some better players and roll with it next year on hopes our pitchers can stay healthy.
Mustard_Tiger wrote:There's no point in me addressing several of those points (everyone knows Godfrey led the charge on the Wells signing, and that JP attempted to trade Rios before signing him) because this is obviously an idea that you've had in your mind for quite some time and you won't change it. Even with all of JP's players making contributions, it's quite obvious that your frustration at his team not making the playoffs will override all of the good things that he's done in his regime.
Anyway, without more luck, a different GM isn't going to do any better than Ricciardi has.
dirtybird wrote:Mustard_Tiger wrote:Sorry, you are really asking for a lot from your GM to win in the AL East with a 80M payroll. And yet, over the last 4 seasons, there haven't been that many teams as successful as the Jays in baseball (winning over 80 games in this division is extremely difficult and an achievement in itself).
Here are the adjusted standings for this year, taking out the luck factor: http://www.baseballprospectus.com/stati ... ndings.php
Saying he doesn't have a plan is also wrong. He's built a very good team here, and it's supported by many of his draft picks and trade acquisitions.
I'm asking him for one to spend the money he gets wisely and if he were to get a good bang for his buck, then I'm sure there's a justification for giving him more. But if he hand a bunch of players longterm contracts that the team regularly keeps eating big chunks of them I don't see any justification on how he should be given more money to misspend. And he has habitually bought high on players (that to me is the antithesis of Moneyball). He himself said when he was hired that he could win with a lot less. I'm confident that if you gave JP the next 25 years to get in the playoffs that the Jays would not make it once. If you're satisfied at the team winning 80 games and never having a shot at the playoffs and call that successful or competitive then so be it. I prefer to think of it as unacceptable and mediocre. And I prefer to find someone that can succeed in the circumstances that he's given rather than finding someone who uses his circumstance as an excuse while never coming close to solving it.