ImageImageImage

OT: UFC 100

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,332
And1: 12,189
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: OT: UFC 100 

Post#41 » by Worm Guts » Wed Jul 15, 2009 1:21 pm

funkatron101 wrote:Then so is Boxing, Rugby, Football, and Professional Wrestling. Each of which I can site more cases of serious injury or death in the past 15 years.

It would be different if the two athletes were unwilling participants. These guys generally have a great respect for their opponents, and the love what they do. Their cuts are superficial, their bruises heal.

If people don't like it, they don't have to watch it. But if they are going on some sort of morality witch hunt, then their list is about to get a lot longer. MMA quickly falls down that list.


Boxing is in the same realm since the goal of the sport is to hurt the other participant. In the other sports, injury is just collateral damage. Even you want to put all those sports in the same category, that doesn't change the argument against MMA.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: OT: UFC 100 

Post#42 » by Devilzsidewalk » Wed Jul 15, 2009 1:28 pm

the goal of every sport is to make money, therefore the goal is fan entertainment. Whatever entertains fans is where they'll go, and violent actions are usually apart of that. I don't think anybody wants permanent or serious injuries, but they do like to toe the line. Humans like to push the envelope, and with that mentality, sometimes we go to far, just how things go.
Image
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,332
And1: 12,189
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: OT: UFC 100 

Post#43 » by Worm Guts » Wed Jul 15, 2009 1:48 pm

Devilzsidewalk wrote:the goal of every sport is to make money, therefore the goal is fan entertainment. Whatever entertains fans is where they'll go, and violent actions are usually apart of that. I don't think anybody wants permanent or serious injuries, but they do like to toe the line. Humans like to push the envelope, and with that mentality, sometimes we go to far, just how things go.



The goal of every sport isn't to make money, that's the goal of every business. The goal of sports is fun, and that includes MMA but thats not really what I meant by goal of the sport. You win at boxing or MMA by injuring your opponent. You don't win a football game by giving an opponent a concussion.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,332
And1: 12,189
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: OT: UFC 100 

Post#44 » by Worm Guts » Wed Jul 15, 2009 1:50 pm

Would it be OK to watch humans fight to the death if they were willing participants? It's not the same thing, but it does prove that there's a line we shouldn't cross.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: OT: UFC 100 

Post#45 » by Devilzsidewalk » Wed Jul 15, 2009 1:58 pm

I know what you're saying, that the basic rules in MMA are to defeat your opponent physically whether by KO or submission or points, but I'm just saying that in professional sports they want to make money and they'll allow people's body's to be damaged within reason to do so if thats what the fans want.

When there's patterns of serious injuries to the head they change the rules, but generally the stuff that wears people down they let go. It's why they allow safeties to go full bore into somebody and hit them - they could easily disallow those shoulder hits that beat the hell out of generally defenseless WRs since its no hassle and more reliable to do a proper wrap tackle, but the safeties are trying to crush people and the NFL doesn't mind because they use those hits to advertise their league, thats what people like.

Worm Guts wrote:Would it be OK to watch humans fight to the death if they were willing participants? It's not the same thing, but it does prove that there's a line we shouldn't cross.


that's not what people want though, I don't know anybody that would want to watch that and I can't imagine any competitors wanting that.
Image
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,332
And1: 12,189
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: OT: UFC 100 

Post#46 » by Worm Guts » Wed Jul 15, 2009 2:02 pm

Devilzsidewalk wrote:

Worm Guts wrote:Would it be OK to watch humans fight to the death if they were willing participants? It's not the same thing, but it does prove that there's a line we shouldn't cross.


that's not what people want though, I don't know anybody that would want to watch that and I can't imagine any competitors wanting that.


About 2000 year ago, it was what people wanted to see. If it was made legal, I'm guessing there would be a few willing participants.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: OT: UFC 100 

Post#47 » by Devilzsidewalk » Wed Jul 15, 2009 2:11 pm

but there were mostly unwilling participants, and eventually society decided they didn't want to see it and it was done away with. Maybe MMA will end up that way too, but for now the reality is all the participants are eager and willing and the safety record is fine and there's no real reason for being against it other than people that a few people that aren't involved in any way with the sport are uncomfortable watching somebody get hit
Image
User avatar
Zeitgeister
General Manager
Posts: 8,717
And1: 7,360
Joined: Nov 11, 2008
   

Re: OT: UFC 100 

Post#48 » by Zeitgeister » Wed Jul 15, 2009 9:03 pm

Devilzsidewalk wrote:

Worm Guts wrote:Would it be OK to watch humans fight to the death if they were willing participants? It's not the same thing, but it does prove that there's a line we shouldn't cross.


that's not what people want though, I don't know anybody that would want to watch that and I can't imagine any competitors wanting that.


Don't forget about the Kumite.
Lenin wrote: All over the world, wherever there are capitalists, freedom of the press means freedom to buy up newspapers, to buy writers, to bribe, buy and fake "public opinion" for the benefit of the bourgeoisie.
Ricky ROY Rubio
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,556
And1: 498
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
Location: Chicago
       

Re: OT: UFC 100 

Post#49 » by Ricky ROY Rubio » Thu Jul 16, 2009 6:56 am

wow revs such a puss. boxing is awesome. the ufc is too. i dont really watch any other mma orgs that much. only fedor, brett rogers and some others.
eye test>cherry picked empty stats
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: OT: UFC 100 

Post#50 » by Devilzsidewalk » Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:30 pm

Zeitgeister wrote:
Devilzsidewalk wrote:

Worm Guts wrote:Would it be OK to watch humans fight to the death if they were willing participants? It's not the same thing, but it does prove that there's a line we shouldn't cross.


that's not what people want though, I don't know anybody that would want to watch that and I can't imagine any competitors wanting that.


Don't forget about the Kumite.


but in the Kumite didn't he kill that guy and then everybody turned their back on him because he disgraced the sanctity of the tournament? Or maybe that was The Quest, I get confused since the movies were exactly the same.

Ricky ROY Rubio wrote:wow revs such a puss. boxing is awesome. the ufc is too. i dont really watch any other mma orgs that much. only fedor, brett rogers and some others.


Rev is just non-supportive of violence in the form of entertainment and saying fighting should be used only in protection I think. That's understandable. Personally I say all life is an abomination of God so we should strive to destroy ourselves to win His glory.
Image
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,286
And1: 19,298
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: OT: UFC 100 

Post#51 » by shrink » Thu Jul 16, 2009 7:21 pm

Ricky ROY Rubio wrote:wow revs such a puss.


Rev is the baddest bad ass of us all (the rest of us are just plain old asses).

I've enjoyed this discussion because both sides have made great points and have been respectful of each other's views. That doesn't happen in most forums.
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: OT: UFC 100 

Post#52 » by revprodeji » Thu Jul 16, 2009 10:30 pm

Ricky ROY Rubio wrote:wow revs such a puss. boxing is awesome. the ufc is too. i dont really watch any other mma orgs that much. only fedor, brett rogers and some others.


The great argument of "its awesome".

I am a what? Could you explain? I am really interested. I am hardly a pacifist if that is what you are suggesting. (not that anything is wrong with pacifists)
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
funkatron101
General Manager
Posts: 7,741
And1: 1,177
Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Location: St. Paul

Re: OT: UFC 100 

Post#53 » by funkatron101 » Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:54 pm

revprodeji wrote:
Ricky ROY Rubio wrote:wow revs such a puss. boxing is awesome. the ufc is too. i dont really watch any other mma orgs that much. only fedor, brett rogers and some others.


The great argument of "its awesome".

I am a what? Could you explain? I am really interested. I am hardly a pacifist if that is what you are suggesting. (not that anything is wrong with pacifists)

You should fight him! And record it for our entertainment! :lol:
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: OT: UFC 100 

Post#54 » by revprodeji » Fri Jul 17, 2009 6:36 pm

I would but I would hate to get 8 years like Cameron Poe.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: OT: UFC 100 

Post#55 » by Esohny » Fri Jul 17, 2009 6:38 pm

revprodeji wrote:I would but I would hate to get 8 years like Cameron Poe.


Don't be that guy. Nic Cage is a complete sally.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: OT: UFC 100 

Post#56 » by revprodeji » Fri Jul 17, 2009 6:46 pm

I wonder if that law still exists. if a special ops soldier with combat experience and training is considered a "lethal weapon" if fighting in a case of self-defense. I should probably look that up.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: OT: UFC 100 

Post#57 » by Devilzsidewalk » Fri Jul 17, 2009 6:49 pm

I thought you said you have Ilguaskas feet, can't I win the fight with a brisk walking pace?
Image
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: OT: UFC 100 

Post#58 » by revprodeji » Fri Jul 17, 2009 7:00 pm

I have bad feet. I am a disabled Vet with the whole VA status. But I am only 26 and take different pain killers and other pills and I can do most things. I am still active with Basketball, Tae Kwon Do and Tennis. I am confident I am one of the few people you know that could kill you and leave almost no proof. :D
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: OT: UFC 100 

Post#59 » by Devilzsidewalk » Fri Jul 17, 2009 7:21 pm

what fun is it to kill somebody unless you can brag about it to all your friends
Image

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves