STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
- Go7enKs
- Senior
- Posts: 538
- And1: 0
- Joined: Aug 15, 2006
- Location: Barcelona (Spain)
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
Let's sign KT and Tim Thomas for the minumum and we almost got our beloved SSOL Suns!
My "Bright Side of the Sun" profile
Twitter account: @lorenzoFB
Twitter account: @lorenzoFB
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
- JohnVancouver
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,016
- And1: 236
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
- Location: Vancouver, BC
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
RunDogGun wrote:JohnVancouver wrote:RunDogGun wrote:Around $3.8 mil according to ESPN. So more like 1/3 the price.
He signed a 4 year/$30 mil deal in spring '04, so i guess he signed a two year deal after that (SA?)
That's pretty cheap for KT though I don't know how much he has left - could be plenty, I haven't seen him play much since he left Seattle.
Too expensive for us though/quote]
You didn't watch him(KT) when the Spurs used him to beat us?![]()
Uhhh ..... yes, well, there's that, isn't there? Slipped my mind, probably something to do with being too painful to recall.
"Deng and Mozgov was some 1980s Clippers sh*t. So, so dumb" - Sedale Threatt
"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013
"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon
"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013
"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
- JohnVancouver
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,016
- And1: 236
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
- Location: Vancouver, BC
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
Go7enKs wrote:Let's sign KT and Tim Thomas for the minumum and we almost got our beloved SSOL Suns!
It would be nice, but it wouldn't turn back the clock, sadly.
"Deng and Mozgov was some 1980s Clippers sh*t. So, so dumb" - Sedale Threatt
"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013
"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon
"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013
"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
- Go7enKs
- Senior
- Posts: 538
- And1: 0
- Joined: Aug 15, 2006
- Location: Barcelona (Spain)
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
JohnVancouver wrote:Go7enKs wrote:Let's sign KT and Tim Thomas for the minumum and we almost got our beloved SSOL Suns!
It would be nice, but it wouldn't turn back the clock, sadly.
First let's sign them. Then we'll worry about the clock

My "Bright Side of the Sun" profile
Twitter account: @lorenzoFB
Twitter account: @lorenzoFB
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
- Suns_RoadRunner
- Sophomore
- Posts: 195
- And1: 53
- Joined: Jul 13, 2009
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
KT would be nice. He would give us a much needed post defender and he can also step out and hit that sweet mid-range jumper. But he is getting up there in age though. 


Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
- likwitdesi
- Starter
- Posts: 2,389
- And1: 60
- Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
I'd make a move for Shelden Williams. Another cheap big who can provide rebounding and D and probably still has some upside if he can add the midrange J to his arsenal. He would be a modern-day Antonio Davis/Kurt Thomas type of player
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
- -SDU-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,084
- And1: 32
- Joined: Jul 11, 2001
- Location: -SDU-'s hitlist - David Stern, Robert Horry, Stu Jackson, Tim Donaghy, Argentina, Doomsdayers
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
im still hanging out for chris wilcox to enable amare to play C
targets that could be on our radar...
wilcox
mikki moore
joe smith
ryan hollins
johan petro
walter hermann
marquis daniels (If Jrich goes)
Luther Head
Rodney Carney
Mason
Robert Swift
Tyronne Lue
diogu
brevin knight
these sorts of players are available and unrestricted - i have no doubt we could sign 2 of these guys on this list for the minimum to round the roster out nicely
targets that could be on our radar...
wilcox
mikki moore
joe smith
ryan hollins
johan petro
walter hermann
marquis daniels (If Jrich goes)
Luther Head
Rodney Carney
Mason
Robert Swift
Tyronne Lue
diogu
brevin knight
these sorts of players are available and unrestricted - i have no doubt we could sign 2 of these guys on this list for the minimum to round the roster out nicely
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,601
- And1: 133
- Joined: Dec 03, 2006
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
-
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
Ih8Ginobili is saying that you guys are signing Von Wafer via twitter.
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
- lilfishi22
- Forum Mod - Suns
- Posts: 36,229
- And1: 24,587
- Joined: Oct 16, 2007
- Location: Australia
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
Hmmm Von Wafer. He's a nice scorer off the bench, but we already have Barbs. Wouldn't make sense unless Barbosa suddenly turns into a PG.
OR we have plans in place to move JRich for a C (oh god please not Dally).
OR we have plans in place to move JRich for a C (oh god please not Dally).
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
- JohnVancouver
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,016
- And1: 236
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
- Location: Vancouver, BC
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
lilfishi22 wrote:Hmmm Von Wafer. He's a nice scorer off the bench, but we already have Barbs. Wouldn't make sense unless Barbosa suddenly turns into a PG.
OR we have plans in place to move JRich for a C (oh god please not Dally).
Fishi and I often disagree but we have come together as one in our fear of Sammy landing here .....
"Deng and Mozgov was some 1980s Clippers sh*t. So, so dumb" - Sedale Threatt
"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013
"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon
"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013
"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
- lilfishi22
- Forum Mod - Suns
- Posts: 36,229
- And1: 24,587
- Joined: Oct 16, 2007
- Location: Australia
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
JohnVancouver wrote:lilfishi22 wrote:Hmmm Von Wafer. He's a nice scorer off the bench, but we already have Barbs. Wouldn't make sense unless Barbosa suddenly turns into a PG.
OR we have plans in place to move JRich for a C (oh god please not Dally).
Fishi and I often disagree but we have come together as one in our fear of Sammy landing here .....
Really? I find myself agreeing with you on quite a few things. Maybe I just don't post it.
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
- Go7enKs
- Senior
- Posts: 538
- And1: 0
- Joined: Aug 15, 2006
- Location: Barcelona (Spain)
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
IHG is also saying we're trying to move JRich for a center. Guess Von Wafer is a replacement for JRich...mmm...
My "Bright Side of the Sun" profile
Twitter account: @lorenzoFB
Twitter account: @lorenzoFB
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,353
- And1: 8,997
- Joined: Jun 24, 2009
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
SportsWorld wrote:Ih8Ginobili is saying that you guys are signing Von Wafer via twitter.
Can this guy play defense?
At least he is 6'5 - so that would would a nice addition if he can defend as they sure need a guard that can stop somebody.
But as was mentioned, that would mean Barbs or JRich is gone. Not loving the idea of JRich for Dalembert. Too bad Sterling wouldn't take JRich for Camby and another piece?
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 144
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 30, 2007
- Location: Israel
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
JohnVancouver wrote:lilfishi22 wrote:Hmmm Von Wafer. He's a nice scorer off the bench, but we already have Barbs. Wouldn't make sense unless Barbosa suddenly turns into a PG.
OR we have plans in place to move JRich for a C (oh god please not Dally).
Fishi and I often disagree but we have come together as one in our fear of Sammy landing here .....
I understood the fear of getting Sammy for Wallace's contract, since this would have hurt our cap space next year,
but getting him for J-Rich's contract doesn't hurt there, it actually saves us few millions as well (since the contracts are the same length, but J-Rich earns 2M more each year).
Barbosa can give us whatever J-Rich gave, at half the price, and i'm not sure we can say that on Lopez & Sammy (and i do think Lopez can become a decent big men - 10/10, but it might take more time).
And i'll say again that i'll prefer to get KT here...
though slim chances of this happening, since it'll be Kerr admitting another mistake.
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
- Sun Scorched
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,736
- And1: 280
- Joined: Aug 01, 2007
-
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
-SDU- wrote:im still hanging out for chris wilcox to enable amare to play C
targets that could be on our radar...
wilcox
mikki moore
joe smith
ryan hollins
johan petro
walter hermann
marquis daniels (If Jrich goes)
Luther Head
Rodney Carney
Mason
Robert Swift
Tyronne Lue
diogu
brevin knight
these sorts of players are available and unrestricted - i have no doubt we could sign 2 of these guys on this list for the minimum to round the roster out nicely
I like Wilcox a lot. Also like Ryan Hollins. Seems stupid to me that Dallas hasn't picked him back up.

On Steve Nash:
G35 wrote:He may run a great offense but I wouldn't choose him over Amare to start a team.
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
- GoSunsGo
- Sophomore
- Posts: 171
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 17, 2008
- Location: Valley of the Sun, AZ
- Contact:
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
Love how when they introduced Frye, he brought up the WIldcat ties w/ Kerr, Gentry was like "oh great, here we go, that didnt take long" lol.
...im still surprised Chase didnt end up here. Or will he...(muisc que)
DUN DUN DUN
...im still surprised Chase didnt end up here. Or will he...(muisc que)
DUN DUN DUN
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
- KJ7
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 10,004
- And1: 2
- Joined: Aug 06, 2004
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
BobbieL wrote:
Can this guy play defense?
At least he is 6'5 - so that would would a nice addition if he can defend as they sure need a guard that can stop somebody.
But as was mentioned, that would mean Barbs or JRich is gone. Not loving the idea of JRich for Dalembert. Too bad Sterling wouldn't take JRich for Camby and another piece?
Spoken and heard a few things about him. No-one mentions his D as a positive.
Baffling why we would go for another volume scorer unless it's because we are moving either LB or JRich.

Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
- Sun Scorched
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,736
- And1: 280
- Joined: Aug 01, 2007
-
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
KJ7 wrote:BobbieL wrote:
Can this guy play defense?
At least he is 6'5 - so that would would a nice addition if he can defend as they sure need a guard that can stop somebody.
But as was mentioned, that would mean Barbs or JRich is gone. Not loving the idea of JRich for Dalembert. Too bad Sterling wouldn't take JRich for Camby and another piece?
Spoken and heard a few things about him. No-one mentions his D as a positive.
Baffling why we would go for another volume scorer unless it's because we are moving either LB or JRich.
He's not a full-fledged defensive stopper, but he's active and stays in front of his man at all times.
He runs the break and finishes very well. He's not a "volume scorer" per se. I've seen him get the croud riled up several times with some quick transition layups and dagger threes. If we are getting him for the vet. minimum I am completely happy with the pick-up.

On Steve Nash:
G35 wrote:He may run a great offense but I wouldn't choose him over Amare to start a team.
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
- Sun Scorched
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,736
- And1: 280
- Joined: Aug 01, 2007
-
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
Was Hill's contract the use of part of our MLE or simply an expansion of his previous contract and allowable without the use of our exception?

On Steve Nash:
G35 wrote:He may run a great offense but I wouldn't choose him over Amare to start a team.
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,599
- And1: 292
- Joined: Apr 19, 2009
-
Re: STICKY: Hill stays, Frye signs, Nash very close to extension
Sun Scorched wrote:KJ7 wrote:BobbieL wrote:
Can this guy play defense?
At least he is 6'5 - so that would would a nice addition if he can defend as they sure need a guard that can stop somebody.
But as was mentioned, that would mean Barbs or JRich is gone. Not loving the idea of JRich for Dalembert. Too bad Sterling wouldn't take JRich for Camby and another piece?
Spoken and heard a few things about him. No-one mentions his D as a positive.
Baffling why we would go for another volume scorer unless it's because we are moving either LB or JRich.
He's not a full-fledged defensive stopper, but he's active and stays in front of his man at all times.
He runs the break and finishes very well. He's not a "volume scorer" per se. I've seen him get the croud riled up several times with some quick transition layups and dagger threes. If we are getting him for the vet. minimum I am completely happy with the pick-up.
I believe Houston was offering him the vet minimum, so I'd be surprised if he signed with us for just that much.
DFC Pride

