ImageImageImage

Celtic, Davis Moving Closer? (Article, Boston Herald)

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

GuyClinch
RealGM
Posts: 13,345
And1: 1,478
Joined: Jul 19, 2004

Re: Celtic, Davis Moving Closer? (Article, Boston Herald) 

Post#21 » by GuyClinch » Thu Jul 16, 2009 7:52 pm

Easily 6" taller? That would mean Baby is 6'4 or 6'5 or Sheed shot up a few inches in his 30's.

My guess is baby is about 6'7, not 6'9 as listed and Sheed is probably 6'10 or so. Hardly 6 inches.


Whatever. Davis is the smallest 6'9" I have ever seen. When we get out of town feeds the announcers laugh every time his height is mentioned. His real height is around 6'5" or 6'6" Rasheed OTOH is a legit long 6'11" guy..

So its about 6 inches. If you count standing reach the amount is probably a few inches more then that.

Pete
TheOGJabroni
Head Coach
Posts: 6,475
And1: 1,994
Joined: Jul 28, 2007
       

Re: Celtic, Davis Moving Closer? (Article, Boston Herald) 

Post#22 » by TheOGJabroni » Thu Jul 16, 2009 8:02 pm

GuyClinch wrote:
Easily 6" taller? That would mean Baby is 6'4 or 6'5 or Sheed shot up a few inches in his 30's.

My guess is baby is about 6'7, not 6'9 as listed and Sheed is probably 6'10 or so. Hardly 6 inches.


Whatever. Davis is the smallest 6'9" I have ever seen. When we get out of town feeds the announcers laugh every time his height is mentioned. His real height is around 6'5" or 6'6" Rasheed OTOH is a legit long 6'11" guy..

So its about 6 inches. If you count standing reach the amount is probably a few inches more then that.

Pete

Like I said, there's probably 0 chance he is 6'9" thats probably with shoes and a lift at the combine but i can't see it giving him more than 2 inches extra, 2.5 tops. And is Rasheed really a legit 6'11? I'm not questioning you, rather just a sincere question. I just always assume they are given an inch or so.

Sorry I'm just nitpicking :wink:
Kids Are Alright
Veteran
Posts: 2,832
And1: 141
Joined: Jan 15, 2005
Location: Maine

Re: Celtic, Davis Moving Closer? (Article, Boston Herald) 

Post#23 » by Kids Are Alright » Thu Jul 16, 2009 8:23 pm

Of course the big stat problem with BBD (who I think is a Powe - like 6-6 player) is the miserable 6.7 RPG playing at the 4 or 5.

Barkley avgd almost 13 RPG, Charles avgd almost 15 in his second season.

Baby is a pick and pop 4 with bid defensive liabilities or a 5 for fronting monsters in the paint with big rebounding liabilities. I think he'll be down the bench on any team.

Still, he's worth Scal's contract IMO. Wallace didn't score until the 4th quarter the last time we played them, he'll disappear in games next year and Baby will (as always) be hungry.
Tanking :nonono: Live for the day 8-)
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: Celtic, Davis Moving Closer? (Article, Boston Herald) 

Post#24 » by sully00 » Thu Jul 16, 2009 9:31 pm

Wallace measured 6'9.75" in 1996

Davis measured 6'7.75" at a workout in PHI prior to the draft in 2007

For Pete 6 must be the new 2. Sure Wallace plays longer than Davis but what is the point in overstating things to the absurd.

Baby's market is dictated by similar players and their contracts. That puts him in the 4-5 mil range. The problem is his playoff run has put him in a position were he has done something most of the undersized PF's haven't gotten the chance to do and that is showcase their abilities as a starter in the playoffs and perform. While Davis has his flaws but he is a scorer at the center position and that is pretty rare.

I think looking at him as a starter is a mistake but as back up big man on a contender he has value. To gloat that Davis doesn't have any offers and nobody wants him is pretty ignorant, David Lee, Ramon Sessions, Jamario Moon, don't have any offers either. There has only been 3 offer sheets signed this offseason.
User avatar
ParticleMan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,071
And1: 9,074
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
     

Re: Celtic, Davis Moving Closer? (Article, Boston Herald) 

Post#25 » by ParticleMan » Thu Jul 16, 2009 9:45 pm

theman wrote:
ParticleMan wrote:yeah not much new here.

BBD is ending up in a bad position. There's almost nobody left who wants to sign him for anything close to the MLE. Dallas maybe but Cuban has professed a dislike for Baby. Detroit won't sign him to their capspace since the C's would easily match.

I'm not sure how the stalemate will be broken. Maybe the C's and BBD will just agree on a reasonable deal and call it a day. I'd say 4 yr, 16 mil would be fair.


Who are you his agent?

I think 3.2 to start with yearly raises, and a team option for year three.



haha. i think his agent would push for a shorter deal, not longer. it's in our interest to tie him up at low $ for 4 or 5 years. if we do a 4 year deal starting at 3.2 mil, that's already almost $15mil. So yeah, i'd say that's about right. we offer just a bit more than DET can, and lock him for as long as we can.

and this idea that BBD is only 6-6 is crazy. that's Leon, not Baby. Big Baby is 6-8, according to his measurement. it's just that he has short arms and no hops. plus he looks shorter cuz he's kinda fat :D
17banners
Ballboy
Posts: 22
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 26, 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Contact:

Re: Celtic, Davis Moving Closer? (Article, Boston Herald) 

Post#26 » by 17banners » Thu Jul 16, 2009 10:02 pm

I'm not an expert captologist by any means, and don't even know if this would work, but would it be possible for the Celts to offer Phoenix a S&T deal, with Baby and Barbosa as the centerpieces? I'd much rather see someone like that (Barbosa) coming off the bench than an undersized 4 signed semi long-term. Just my $0.02. :wink:
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: Celtic, Davis Moving Closer? (Article, Boston Herald) 

Post#27 » by sully00 » Thu Jul 16, 2009 10:11 pm

It is possible, complicated but possible. But the reason PHX would want to move Barbossa is money, he is a fine player. They also just signed Channing Frye to a two year deal.
User avatar
SichtingLives
RealGM
Posts: 40,893
And1: 25,460
Joined: Mar 25, 2009

Re: Celtic, Davis Moving Closer? (Article, Boston Herald) 

Post#28 » by SichtingLives » Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:22 am

GuyClinch wrote:
Easily 6" taller? That would mean Baby is 6'4 or 6'5 or Sheed shot up a few inches in his 30's.

My guess is baby is about 6'7, not 6'9 as listed and Sheed is probably 6'10 or so. Hardly 6 inches.


Whatever. Davis is the smallest 6'9" I have ever seen. When we get out of town feeds the announcers laugh every time his height is mentioned. His real height is around 6'5" or 6'6" Rasheed OTOH is a legit long 6'11" guy..

So its about 6 inches. If you count standing reach the amount is probably a few inches more then that.

Pete


So Leon Powe is 6'4" or so and Paul Pierce is 6'3"ish?? :rofl: :crazy:

Seen up close, multiple times, in person, Glen Davis has an inch on Leon, and a few on Pierce. So I'm sorry, but you're wrong.

Oh, and there's no "long" 6'11", there's just 6"11". Any longer would be 7 feet. Consult with a measuring tape for proof of that.
10 miles through the snow uphill both ways
GuyClinch
RealGM
Posts: 13,345
And1: 1,478
Joined: Jul 19, 2004

Re: Celtic, Davis Moving Closer? (Article, Boston Herald) 

Post#29 » by GuyClinch » Fri Jul 17, 2009 3:18 am

Oh, and there's no "long" 6'11", there's just 6"11". Any longer would be 7 feet. Consult with a measuring tape for proof of that.


standing reach..<g> It's more important then height. So Sheed is two inches taller then BBD. I stand corrected. He towers over him in actual play, IMHO. Bottom line is there will be alot less minutes for BBD with both Sheed and KG here.

If your his agent you want to get him on a team with a decent opportunity. BBD could make some money if he got major minutes.
User avatar
SeizeCoup
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,630
And1: 680
Joined: Apr 26, 2005
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Celtic, Davis Moving Closer? (Article, Boston Herald) 

Post#30 » by SeizeCoup » Fri Jul 17, 2009 4:53 am

Baby is all about the money. As a second rounder he signed the shorter contract hoping for a big payday earlier. But he didn't put in the work. I'd offer 3 years around 3 million per.
GuyClinch
RealGM
Posts: 13,345
And1: 1,478
Joined: Jul 19, 2004

Re: Celtic, Davis Moving Closer? (Article, Boston Herald) 

Post#31 » by GuyClinch » Fri Jul 17, 2009 1:11 pm

^^ Trade for Outlaw. BBD is largely duplicated by Scal. Yes BBD MIGHT be slightly better then Scal - but we have Scal under contract.
humblebum
Banned User
Posts: 11,727
And1: 1,755
Joined: Jan 20, 2005

Re: Celtic, Davis Moving Closer? (Article, Boston Herald) 

Post#32 » by humblebum » Fri Jul 17, 2009 1:23 pm

Davis is clearly better than Scal.
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

Re: Celtic, Davis Moving Closer? (Article, Boston Herald) 

Post#33 » by MyInsatiableOne » Fri Jul 17, 2009 1:29 pm

humblebum wrote:Davis is clearly better than Scal.


Well duh!
It's still 17 to 11!!!!
humblebum
Banned User
Posts: 11,727
And1: 1,755
Joined: Jan 20, 2005

Re: Celtic, Davis Moving Closer? (Article, Boston Herald) 

Post#34 » by humblebum » Fri Jul 17, 2009 1:43 pm

GuyClinch wrote:^^ Trade for Outlaw. BBD is largely duplicated by Scal. Yes BBD MIGHT be slightly better then Scal - but we have Scal under contract.


Apparently not to everyone...
User avatar
DorfonCeltics
Analyst
Posts: 3,680
And1: 215
Joined: Feb 24, 2005

Re: Celtic, Davis Moving Closer? (Article, Boston Herald) 

Post#35 » by DorfonCeltics » Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:47 pm

Just to help with the clarification on height vs. standing reach. While Sheed might only be 2 inches taller than Baby, I'd be willing to bet my Celtics season tickets that Sheed's standing reach is 5-6 inches taller than Baby's. That makes Sheed a much more effective player down low and gives him a much better chance at rebounding inside.
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: Celtic, Davis Moving Closer? (Article, Boston Herald) 

Post#36 » by sully00 » Fri Jul 17, 2009 3:22 pm

CalderCup wrote:Baby is all about the money. As a second rounder he signed the shorter contract hoping for a big payday earlier. But he didn't put in the work. I'd offer 3 years around 3 million per.


You have no idea what you are talking about. This is a business everyone is about the money. Baby was smart, look at the choices he is facing and look at the choices Leon is facing. Leon got totally screwed by that 3rd year, no one should ever take that again he didn't even get any extra money.

Return to Boston Celtics