Bernman wrote:Citizen.Eras3d wrote:I don't disagree with you at all. Opinions aren't facts though. I mean how many trailer park trash people have won millions in the lottery? Weird **** happens, educated guesses and projections and whatever are cool and you can't argue with logic but to present something as fact when it's basically an opinion is what my dispute is with.
Ok, it's not an undeniable fact that David Lee is not a mediocre player. It's an opinion and a strong probability, based upon all the evidence that lies before us today. So given the probability that David Lee would be a mediocre starter in the Bucks' system, you think it'd be a prudent decision by the Bucks to allocate him above average starter money?
Since you like Roland Rating so much, why did Lee finish 3rd on the team in 2007-08 and lead the team the season prior to that?



















