ImageImageImage

stralman traded to calgary

Moderator: Crowned

User avatar
RomaniaLuvTR
Head Coach
Posts: 6,494
And1: 1,052
Joined: Apr 02, 2007
Location: bjr-vacante.ro

stralman traded to calgary 

Post#1 » by RomaniaLuvTR » Mon Jul 27, 2009 11:09 pm

stralman and stuart for wayne primeau...first move that i don`t like from BB https://twitter.com/benhankinson
bryant08
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 5,969
And1: 27
Joined: Jul 25, 2006
Contact:
       

Re: stralman traded to calgary 

Post#2 » by bryant08 » Mon Jul 27, 2009 11:11 pm

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/2009/07/ ... mes_trade/

wtf is all I can say. Primeau is a 4th line C, nothing more, and all we get for giving up Stralman is a 2nd in 2011?? Wow, Burke lost the plot on this one. And I'm assuming this means Kaberle is sticking around, after dealing Stralman we only have one guy that can move the puck and that's Ian White (to some extent Beauchemin isn't a bad puck mover).

I'm still in shock at how bad this deal is. I can't believe Burke would just give away Stralman like that. We should've gotten a 2nd rounder just to take on Primeau's contract for next season and maybe giving them a semi-decent prospect, not one looked at as a future top 4 defenseman.
User avatar
beater97
Starter
Posts: 2,283
And1: 6
Joined: Apr 11, 2006

Re: stralman traded to calgary 

Post#3 » by beater97 » Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:17 am

Stralman would never be a top 4 on a good team.
YogiStewart
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,926
And1: 6,447
Joined: Aug 08, 2007
Location: Its ALL about Location, Location, Location!

Re: stralman traded to calgary 

Post#4 » by YogiStewart » Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:42 am

funny thing is:
he becomes one of the better Leaf forwards.
bryant08
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 5,969
And1: 27
Joined: Jul 25, 2006
Contact:
       

Re: stralman traded to calgary 

Post#5 » by bryant08 » Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:48 am

beater97 wrote:Stralman would never be a top 4 on a good team.


Yeah, it's debatable, but what isn't is his potential. I personally think you're looking at a solid puck moving d-man, a great asset for the power play and a top 4 on a winning club at some point. But he's a boom or bust really, he doesn't have a niche as a bottom pairing defender, he needs to make it as a top 4. I think with his quicks/passing ability, he will.
User avatar
jim todd
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,954
And1: 370
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
       

Re: stralman traded to calgary 

Post#6 » by jim todd » Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:12 am

beater97 wrote:Stralman would never be a top 4 on a good team.


i agree with this statement and i like the fact that the leafs are the team that is obtaining the high round pick for a change.
Image
User avatar
TR50
General Manager
Posts: 7,538
And1: 1,221
Joined: Dec 19, 2004
       

Re: stralman traded to calgary 

Post#7 » by TR50 » Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:57 am

I liked Stralman...thought he was a really good piece....I'm not sure about this one
User avatar
Test of Wills
Analyst
Posts: 3,590
And1: 6
Joined: Aug 05, 2006
Location: CN Tower City

Re: stralman traded to calgary 

Post#8 » by Test of Wills » Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:30 am

This looks like a bad deal to me. Primeau is 33 y/o 4th line C who is tough and gritty but we have enough of those. Mayers, Orr and May could all do the same job but better.

A 2nd round-pick is very good thing to obtain but the price was steep in Stralman who is young puck-moving defenseman and young offensive d-men don't come around too often.

While I don't like the deal, I trust what Burkie is doing but time will tell with this deal.
KFlight
Banned User
Posts: 178
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 19, 2009

Re: stralman traded to calgary 

Post#9 » by KFlight » Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:49 am

Maybe if it was a 2nd round pick in 2010's draft I would have been somewhat okay with this deal, but as of now I don't understand the logic behind it...
User avatar
sanity
RealGM
Posts: 17,550
And1: 1,812
Joined: Jul 08, 2009

Re: stralman traded to calgary 

Post#10 » by sanity » Tue Jul 28, 2009 4:00 pm

The only person Stralman could replace was Karberle, and that wasn't happening anyways.

Hes a good skater and can make the first pass out of the d-zone... but other then that, he doesn't provide much. He can't run the PP on an nhl team.

As far as the trade goes... I'm a bit more concerned where Burke is going to get the money to acquire some forwards who can actually score.
bryant08
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 5,969
And1: 27
Joined: Jul 25, 2006
Contact:
       

Re: stralman traded to calgary 

Post#11 » by bryant08 » Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:20 pm

I've cooled on it a bit after considering some things. I've overrated Stralman for sure. I just really liked the fact that this kid came from virtually no where and showed some jaor flashes of skill. But the issue is pretty clear, his defense isn't NHL calibre yet. He had little chance of making the team this year. I still love his potential, but to send him down to the minors he would have had to clear waivers, which wouldn't have happened. All in all it does break into the two parts, Stralman for a 2nd and Stuart/7th for Primeau. I'm still not a fan, but it's not that bad.
Griff83
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,832
And1: 187
Joined: Dec 10, 2006

Re: stralman traded to calgary 

Post#12 » by Griff83 » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:28 pm

Basically the trade breaks down Stralman/7th rounder for a 2011 second rounder.

Colin Stuart = Wayne Primeau.

Both players are around the same in terms of current impact. Neither will make really much noise on the current team and both possibly wouldnt/wont even make the team. If this team really is gunning for the playoffs next season, I'd prolly rank Primeau ahead of Stuart for leadership reasons. This part of the trade has minimal impact either way.

Stralman is a decent prospect but hes not nearly as good as people have made him out to be. Hes been here two seasons and yet to crack the lineup as a regular. He has nice potential but he still has many holes on the defensive side of things. He also has been said to take many nights off last season in the AHL and im sure Burke wasnt a fan of this. As the depth chart stands right now, Stralman wasnt going to be in the top 6 and hes already threatened to bolt back to sweden in the past because he was upset with the lack of oppurtunity he was being given with the Leafs. He was also waiver eligible because of time played in the NHL and theres no way he would have made it thru waivers without getting snagged. Stralman could turn out to be a solid player but things like team depth, waivers and unwillingness to play in the minors for a prolonged period of time certainly played into this deal.

We could have prolly gotten a little more but its not horrible value. We could also use the 2011 pick in some sort of trade to aquire a forward. We can prolly get a player in the second round with just as much potential as Stralman (decent prospect, overrated by leaf fans).
User avatar
why22
Analyst
Posts: 3,530
And1: 16
Joined: Nov 26, 2008
Location: T Dot

Re: stralman traded to calgary 

Post#13 » by why22 » Wed Aug 5, 2009 5:41 pm

RomaniaLuvTR wrote:stralman and stuart for wayne primeau...first move that i don`t like from BB https://twitter.com/benhankinson

i thnik this is karma for the raptors stealing belineli, jeez this is almost as bad as the owen nolan trade
Basketball_Jones wrote:BC holding Casey accountable would go like this:

BC: so I see you played Andrea quite a bit there when he was struggling
Casey: yeah I know, we needed spacing
BC: play him more (walks away)
KFlight
Banned User
Posts: 178
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 19, 2009

Re: stralman traded to calgary 

Post#14 » by KFlight » Sat Aug 8, 2009 8:15 pm

why22 wrote:
RomaniaLuvTR wrote:stralman and stuart for wayne primeau...first move that i don`t like from BB https://twitter.com/benhankinson

i thnik this is karma for the raptors stealing belineli, jeez this is almost as bad as the owen nolan trade


Are you really comparing stralman to brad boyes? :-?

Return to Toronto Maple Leafs