Could we do J-Rich for Odom?

TXSun · Post #21 » by **TXSun** » Fri Jul 31, 2009 5:30 am

Kobe, Odom, Artest, Gasol, Bynum......wow. anything less than a 'ship is a total failure.

Nando88 · Post #22 » by **Nando88** » Fri Jul 31, 2009 5:34 am

TXSun wrote:Kobe, Odom, Artest, Gasol, Bynum......wow. anything less than a 'ship is a total failure.

bynum is so overrated

TXSun · Post #23 » by **TXSun** » Fri Jul 31, 2009 5:39 am

Nando88 wrote:
TXSun wrote:Kobe, Odom, Artest, Gasol, Bynum......wow. anything less than a 'ship is a total failure.

bynum is so overrated

I agree. The guy is injury-prone. Once he comes back from an injury he's a non-factor.

grumpysaddle · Post #24 » by **grumpysaddle** » Fri Jul 31, 2009 6:50 am

artest in L.A. i mean... artest in houston was a different world all together. how insane do you think artest is gonna go living in L.A. with everything there is to do. i hope he ruins their chemistry and makes the locker room a living hell.

BurningHeart · Post #25 » by **BurningHeart** » Fri Jul 31, 2009 7:38 am

rsavaj wrote:Which means that Lakers fans are stupid.

Well no ****. Laker fans are EASILY the most unintelligent fans in sports, and it's not even close. Seriously no exaggeration.

sunsfan3 · Post #26 » by **sunsfan3** » Fri Jul 31, 2009 8:05 am

Trading J-Rich for Odom is a pretty stupid trade on our behalf.
Odom expects a lot of money for long time, while we have J-Rich for less money and an option of re-signing him if he's wanted back in Phoenix.
On the roster side-- J-Rich is a solid defensive SG that can't be replaced with our current roster. On the other hand, Odom is a decent PF. But why would we need him if we already have a more explosive Amar'e Stoudamire and Channing Frye?

Nando88 · Post #27 » by **Nando88** » Fri Jul 31, 2009 8:23 am

sunsfan3 wrote:J-Rich is a solid defensive SG that can't be replaced with our current roster. On the other hand, Odom is a decent PF.

0_O

JohnVancouver · Post #28 » by **JohnVancouver** » Fri Jul 31, 2009 5:46 pm

Nando88 wrote:
sunsfan3 wrote:J-Rich is a solid defensive SG that can't be replaced with our current roster. On the other hand, Odom is a decent PF.

0_O

Indeed. Where to begin with this?

1) JRich may at some point in his life played defense, of any kind. He hasn't shown any interest in it here
2) Barbs replaces him quite handily. Only real difference is Barbs has become passable at the 1 slot.
3) Odom is, when motivated, an absolute warrior at PF

Post #29 » by **Qwigglez** » Fri Jul 31, 2009 10:31 pm

grumpysaddle wrote:artest in L.A. i mean... artest in houston was a different world all together. how insane do you think artest is gonna go living in L.A. with everything there is to do. i hope he ruins their chemistry and makes the locker room a living hell.

I am hoping Artest will become a distraction and more of a liability than an asset to the Lakers.

Could we do J-Rich for Odom?

Re: Could we do J-Rich for Odom?

Re: Could we do J-Rich for Odom?

Re: Could we do J-Rich for Odom?

Re: Could we do J-Rich for Odom?

Re: Could we do J-Rich for Odom?

Re: Could we do J-Rich for Odom?

Re: Could we do J-Rich for Odom?

Re: Could we do J-Rich for Odom?

Re: Could we do J-Rich for Odom?

Re: Could we do J-Rich for Odom?

Re: Could we do J-Rich for Odom?

Re: Could we do J-Rich for Odom?

Re: Could we do J-Rich for Odom?

Re: Could we do J-Rich for Odom?

Re: Could we do J-Rich for Odom?

Re: Could we do J-Rich for Odom?

Re: Could we do J-Rich for Odom?

Re: Could we do J-Rich for Odom?