riley doesn't like boozers posturing

Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS

User avatar
DelaneyRudd
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 104,536
And1: 9,467
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
     

Re: riley doesn't like boozers posturing 

Post#21 » by DelaneyRudd » Fri Aug 14, 2009 8:36 am

The Jazz haven't said ****.
Xanthis
Junior
Posts: 389
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 19, 2009
     

Re: riley doesn't like boozers posturing 

Post#22 » by Xanthis » Fri Aug 14, 2009 1:45 pm

saggyb0b wrote:Of course no team wants to get worse in any trade, but I think (& hopefully the FO does to) it needs to be looked at over more than just 1 season and make the move that netts them the best return now, for the future. 1 or 2 Sloan-type players on reasonable/expiring contracts and a pick/prospect should be enough.

Yeah because no one has thought of that before.

saggyb0b wrote:I am a Miami fan, and thus think that UD/JJ/2010 1st should be enough of a return to pull the trigger, but I'm sure that Chicago could probly put together a similar offer, so maybe teams are waiting for the value to drop and/or Jazz are waiting for a better offer. Either way, I don't think Riley thinks negative of Boozer's comments, and probly actually likes them because it lowers Boozer's perceived value around the league.

UD does us no good. He is going back to Miami or Orlando after this year. He is not living here for more than a year. No thanks on JJ either. I would rather let Boozer expire than make you guys better this year and pick up your junk.
@ndrew
Analyst
Posts: 3,032
And1: 219
Joined: Jan 15, 2006
Location: Vladivostok, Russia
Contact:
 

Re: riley doesn't like boozers posturing 

Post#23 » by @ndrew » Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:38 pm

In the end, this is a good package. Just couple of more losses to NY and no problems in the locker room. Why not?
Image
Paper Face
Pro Prospect
Posts: 781
And1: 101
Joined: Jun 19, 2009
 

Re: riley doesn't like boozers posturing 

Post#24 » by Paper Face » Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:10 pm

Miami can beat NY with what they have any day of the week.

Boozer is too sheep-like to undermine Sloan. It'll be fine if he stays. But there is no real reason to trade him for scraps.
sipclip - "Even though I love what I have seen from Mitchell if you were to ask anyone if they would rather have Booker and the 24th pick or Mitchell they would all take Booker and the pick."
User avatar
StocktonShorts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,386
And1: 2,551
Joined: Jun 02, 2009
   

Re: riley doesn't like boozers posturing 

Post#25 » by StocktonShorts » Fri Aug 14, 2009 5:01 pm

Paper Face wrote:Miami can beat NY with what they have any day of the week.

Boozer is too sheep-like to undermine Sloan. It'll be fine if he stays. But there is no real reason to trade him for scraps.


The key to me is that you're making at worst a cap-neutral move (you may even save a little) and you're getting a future pick for a guy that the FO didn't expect to have around anyway.

But at this point I think I like any of the discussed Chicago deals better than this one. At least with Tyrus Thomas there's a fair chance that if he works out and fits in you can bring him back (RFA). I honestly don't see Haslem sticking around.
Image
User avatar
miamiballer
General Manager
Posts: 8,182
And1: 1,557
Joined: May 11, 2002
Location: MIA

Re: riley doesn't like boozers posturing 

Post#26 » by miamiballer » Sat Aug 15, 2009 3:19 pm

now that we acquired q rich, i wouldnt be opposed to including cook but it would pain me some, no lie

most i can see miami offer today for boozer is haslem, jones, cook, 1st, cash for boozer and miles

the cash can buyout jones next offseason

Return to Utah Jazz