Image Image Image Image

Adrian Peterson should have been a Bear?

Moderator: chitownsports4ever

User avatar
ChicagoTRS
Pro Prospect
Posts: 826
And1: 6
Joined: Jul 06, 2006

Adrian Peterson should have been a Bear? 

Post#1 » by ChicagoTRS » Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:43 pm

If we traded Briggs to the Redskins we would have had the 6th pick and Peterson would have fell to us...do we regret this now?

It would be bad for the D not to have Briggs and we would not have Olsen but I think we would be far better off with Peterson for the longterm.

When this trade was rumored...I kind of wondered why the Bears did not seem to covet this #6...Peterson was the exact player I was looking at...
Image
User avatar
emperorjones
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,591
And1: 133
Joined: Jun 16, 2006

 

Post#2 » by emperorjones » Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:48 pm

But the Bears would not have drafted Peterson because the were happy with Benson. Angelo didn't do the deal if I recall, in part because he didn't feel like there was a player worth the money at that spot?
User avatar
ChicagoTRS
Pro Prospect
Posts: 826
And1: 6
Joined: Jul 06, 2006

 

Post#3 » by ChicagoTRS » Mon Oct 15, 2007 3:02 pm

Angelo can draft D but he knows little about offense.
Image
User avatar
emperorjones
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,591
And1: 133
Joined: Jun 16, 2006

 

Post#4 » by emperorjones » Mon Oct 15, 2007 5:10 pm

Unfortuntaely I think you are right...including hiring an offensive coordinator
NLK
Head Coach
Posts: 6,093
And1: 9
Joined: Mar 12, 2006
Location: CHICAGO is a big market with many Rings! Eat S#%T New York!

 

Post#5 » by NLK » Mon Oct 15, 2007 6:20 pm

For sure. We need to revamp our Defense, and EJ said it right...New Offensive Coordinator. Like WTF is Ron Turner's problem! Your job is to win, no matter how you do it, our offense has been inept this year, requiring our Defense to hold it down for way too much time. Our offense is supposed to move the sticks, whether by air and/or ground. Getting some quick scores yesterday, doesn't convince me of anything yet (except Hester is Superman & Ron Turner is Kryptonite). Seriously, we as fans should select our next RB, bypassing Angelo's "decision-making." (Normally, I'm upset the day after a loss, probably because I'm tired to vent right after the game.)
-NLK: Offending Djiboutians since November 2007
"You don't truly know someone, until you fight them."
"To deny our own impulses, is to deny the very essence that makes us human."
Howling Mad
General Manager
Posts: 9,043
And1: 624
Joined: Jun 28, 2006

 

Post#6 » by Howling Mad » Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:44 pm

Nope not really.

Hindsight is 20/20 now that we look back at the draft. If we had given up a star defensive player you better believe your ass Angelo was looking at picking up another defensive player. Gaines Adams was the obvious choice at #6 for the Bears if they had actually made that trade.

You have to remember at the time we had no clue how Benson was going to turn out, still don't.

The offseason was also a huge ego trip for the Bears front office so they weren't going to admit they made a mistake with Benson by picking up another running back in Petersen. Yes we got Wolfe in the 3rd round(?) but he was meant for a sideline type back and a short passing game. We have yet to see it, but I think that is the main plan with Benson going up the middle. However our O-line hasn't provided the blocking for such an attack.
Joe Jackson
Analyst
Posts: 3,694
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 26, 2005
Location: Great plains - Big sky- dust bowl

 

Post#7 » by Joe Jackson » Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:22 am

Angelo probably wouldn't have drafted Peterson if he had had two picks in the top 6.

Although it was pretty apparent this Monday morning (and Sunday afternoon) that he should have.
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

 

Post#8 » by SportsWorld » Tue Oct 16, 2007 1:10 am

Or we could have drafted Brady Quinn....or not
User avatar
TylerB
Analyst
Posts: 3,181
And1: 98
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: West Chicago

 

Post#9 » by TylerB » Tue Oct 16, 2007 2:19 am

We wouldn't have taken Peterson, it wouldn't be financially feasible. LaRon Landry on the other hand.
User avatar
NoSkyy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,014
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 20, 2007

 

Post#10 » by NoSkyy » Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:23 am

LaRon Landry would of stopped Adrian Peterson :cry:


But honestly, if I could travel back in time...we would have AP instead of CB and Rock Mctonish and Greg Olsen. How? Don't ask. I would of figured it out :D
User avatar
emperorjones
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,591
And1: 133
Joined: Jun 16, 2006

 

Post#11 » by emperorjones » Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:34 pm

NoSkyy can you change your avatar? Its depressing.
Howling Mad
General Manager
Posts: 9,043
And1: 624
Joined: Jun 28, 2006

 

Post#12 » by Howling Mad » Tue Oct 16, 2007 1:07 pm

Image

Looks like a Bear to me... :naaa:

(someone had to do it.)
chibearsfan
Junior
Posts: 481
And1: 3
Joined: Dec 06, 2006

 

Post#13 » by chibearsfan » Wed Oct 17, 2007 4:21 pm

"LaRon Landry would of stopped Adrian Peterson"

nah.
Zilai35
Banned User
Posts: 20
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 09, 2007

 

Post#14 » by Zilai35 » Wed Oct 17, 2007 4:56 pm

The Bears thought Benson was the next big thing and would of passed on Peterson for the Safety that the Redskins drafted, which by the looks of it would of been a good pick up for the Bears.
Plus I like Olsen, his skill and bravado make will make him a top TE in the NFL in a few years, let's just hope he has a QB to throw him the ball consistently or an offensive coordinator who can game plan better, because make no mistake we have the weapons to have a decent offense.
chibearsfan
Junior
Posts: 481
And1: 3
Joined: Dec 06, 2006

 

Post#15 » by chibearsfan » Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:14 am

^^Todd Heap comes to mind.

Return to Chicago Bears