NyKnicks1714 wrote:cgf wrote:NyKnicks1714 wrote:I agree with that. I give Harris a very slight edge over Nate offensively, but when you consider other aspects of the game, Harris is easily the better player.
Sure, but despite all of nate's talents offensively he's a disfunctional player because of how much he needs the ball and how much he's focused on scoring instead of making his team-mates better. If you agree that Harris is a marginally better offensive player than you have to recognize those same flaws to Harris' game which will always keep him from being even a #2 option on a top tier team.
I don't think he would make a good second option on a top tier team. I think he would make a good one on a decent/good team, and a good 3rd scorer on a top-tier team. If you put him on a team like SA though in place of Parker, I think we would succeed there as a 2nd option offensively.
Agreed, that's why I don't think the net's core is that much better set up than ours, their best player profiles to be a number 3 scorer on a top tier team and I think that if Gallo adjusts to the NBA and can play here the way he was in Italy, not even improving his game, just adapting it, he'll be a legit number two scorer on a top tier team, because he's a smarter offensive player than Harris with a much better shot, touch and understanding of how to get enough room to put the ball in the hoop, as well as the length and post skills to get into the paint and be dangerous there.























