ImageImageImage

Channing Frye

Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22

Malapropism
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,329
And1: 1,520
Joined: Jun 15, 2008
 

Re: Channing Frye 

Post#21 » by Malapropism » Mon Nov 2, 2009 6:47 am

He's basically a cheaper Bargnani.
User avatar
Go7enKs
Senior
Posts: 538
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 15, 2006
Location: Barcelona (Spain)

Re: Channing Frye 

Post#22 » by Go7enKs » Mon Nov 2, 2009 9:25 am

I don't understand why people think that shooting threes means no defensive rebounds...It has nothing to do with it. Maybe OFFENSIVE rebounds, yeah, but we are not getting many of those anyway. The main problem is defensive rebounds, and it's an issue that has NOTHING to do with Frye shooting threes.
My "Bright Side of the Sun" profile
Twitter account: @lorenzoFB
User avatar
WTFsunsFTW
Veteran
Posts: 2,700
And1: 113
Joined: Aug 04, 2007
 

Re: Channing Frye 

Post#23 » by WTFsunsFTW » Mon Nov 2, 2009 9:39 am

Malapropism wrote:He's basically a cheaper Bargnani.

I prefer him over bargs right now :)
User avatar
WTFsunsFTW
Veteran
Posts: 2,700
And1: 113
Joined: Aug 04, 2007
 

Re: Channing Frye 

Post#24 » by WTFsunsFTW » Mon Nov 2, 2009 9:46 am

Go7enKs wrote:I don't understand why people think that shooting threes means no defensive rebounds...It has nothing to do with it. Maybe OFFENSIVE rebounds, yeah, but we are not getting many of those anyway. The main problem is defensive rebounds, and it's an issue that has NOTHING to do with Frye shooting threes.

Very true.

Every game we blatantly lose will be because of either:

1. Opponent 2nd chance points (def reb)
2. Turnovers

or a combo of both.

Possession for possession, we will outscore any team, and as long as we KEEP UP on rebounds and dont pass the opponent in turnovers, we wont lose. Simple as that.

More 3s
Higher FG%
More PTS

SSOL Recipe ftw
nevetsov
Head Coach
Posts: 6,026
And1: 1,709
Joined: Jan 11, 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Contact:
 

Re: Channing Frye 

Post#25 » by nevetsov » Mon Nov 2, 2009 2:03 pm

Can anyone else see some duplication in skills between our current starters and those of previous years' starters?

Ie
Nash = Nash
Stoudemre = Stoudemire
Hill = JJ's skills/ Marion's D and 3ball
Frye = Q's offense in Diaw's body
Rich = Leandro + Marion on offense in Q's body?

So it's almost like trotting out Nash/ Marion/ Q/ Amare and some Leandro/ JJ elements on Offense
while at the same time having Nash/ Q/ Marion/ Stoudemire/ Diaw on D..?

Maybe not, I dunno
Austin
Senior
Posts: 536
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 22, 2009

Re: Channing Frye 

Post#26 » by Austin » Mon Nov 2, 2009 2:28 pm

Hello 12 3's in the past 2 games!!! Frye is the man!
Image
User avatar
JohnVancouver
General Manager
Posts: 9,016
And1: 236
Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: Channing Frye 

Post#27 » by JohnVancouver » Mon Nov 2, 2009 7:10 pm

Malapropism wrote:He's basically a cheaper Bargnani.



Uh, Bargs is a better defender and is closer to Dirk than he is to Frye. I don't mean he's as good as, just that he has more offensive options - drives, stepbacks etc - than CF.
That I've seen so far, that is - that one drive last night was an eye-opener
"Deng and Mozgov was some 1980s Clippers sh*t. So, so dumb" - Sedale Threatt

"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013

"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon
User avatar
JohnVancouver
General Manager
Posts: 9,016
And1: 236
Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: Channing Frye 

Post#28 » by JohnVancouver » Mon Nov 2, 2009 7:12 pm

Go7enKs wrote:I don't understand why people think that shooting threes means no defensive rebounds...It has nothing to do with it. Maybe OFFENSIVE rebounds, yeah, but we are not getting many of those anyway. The main problem is defensive rebounds, and it's an issue that has NOTHING to do with Frye shooting threes.


Right - and on offense, missed threes tend to be long rebounds, as I believe someone pointed out. It's 2nd chance baskets the other way that hurt us. The only way to fix it is to put bodies on people, which slows the break for us. You can't do both, right?
"Deng and Mozgov was some 1980s Clippers sh*t. So, so dumb" - Sedale Threatt

"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013

"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon
SideSwipe
Analyst
Posts: 3,718
And1: 687
Joined: Aug 20, 2007

Re: Channing Frye 

Post#29 » by SideSwipe » Mon Nov 2, 2009 8:11 pm

If I remember from the box score correctly there was a 15 posession discrepancy between us and Minny.

82-97. They got 15 more attempts off and 4 more offenssive rebounds than we did. If we can tighten up opposing 2nd chance points and attempts, and surround those rebounds with orange, we will be able to work this system to death this year. The difficult part is that SSOL is really designed to have an incredible rebounder pull the board while 3 or 4 other guys start leading the break. The more people we have rebounding, the less people we have on the break.

Overall, thus far Frye has been an amazing, cheap addition, and ironically would work well playing next to Oden in POR. Oh well, their loss. We also should wait a few more games to review consistency before declaring Frye the Savior. As much as Kerr has been maligned, if this plan works out this year, he will be a condidate for Exec of the year. Crazy notion I know, but there is a chance this will work. Once we get through November and December we'll have a better idea of how good we actually are. important not to get too confident right now to make sure we keep ourselves ready to face the Lakers, Dallas, San Antonio, Cleveland, Boston and Orlando. if we can beat 4 out of 6 of those teams the first time we play them, we'll be sitting pretty.
User avatar
rsavaj
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,863
And1: 2,767
Joined: May 09, 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Re: Channing Frye 

Post#30 » by rsavaj » Mon Nov 2, 2009 8:24 pm

aklay1 wrote:A trend that ive noticed starting from preseason, is that Frye is lights out @ home, but shoots atrociously when playing away


I've noticed that too but I'm not sure if that's just my imagination or if the numbers actually back it up.
CourtsideTV
RealGM
Posts: 20,755
And1: 349
Joined: Apr 12, 2004
Location: L-I-M-R
         

Re: Channing Frye 

Post#31 » by CourtsideTV » Mon Nov 2, 2009 8:39 pm

he's a fatter rashard lewis:) i picked him off waivers LOL!!! thank you mr. french fry..keep doing your think.i'll be happy if he gives me 12ppg and 5 rpg if those 12 poitns come from behind the arc;P
Work Hard
LV-Suns
Analyst
Posts: 3,492
And1: 2,099
Joined: Aug 11, 2009
Location: Las Vegas
   

Re: Channing Frye 

Post#32 » by LV-Suns » Mon Nov 2, 2009 9:00 pm

rsavaj wrote:
aklay1 wrote:A trend that ive noticed starting from preseason, is that Frye is lights out @ home, but shoots atrociously when playing away


I've noticed that too but I'm not sure if that's just my imagination or if the numbers actually back it up.

:lol: Its not your imagination, he shoots much worse on the road. Including the pre-season, he is shooting 25% on the road and 54% at home. Only 3 games on the road though, but he had a 2-10 and 1-9 game in the pre-season.
I Dont wanna be here
User avatar
PHXfan85
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,545
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 06, 2007

Re: Channing Frye 

Post#33 » by PHXfan85 » Mon Nov 2, 2009 9:46 pm

While the tre is smooth and, apparently, when he is on he's on (at least at home, we will see about the road here these next few games). What I think will be even more deadly than his 3-point shot is what he develops to work off of a defender rushing out to try and defend that shot. You could see him start to work with it on some of his drives off the pump fake, but he looked kinda rough trying to drive to the hoop. I think that will smooth out as time goes on, but I'd really like to see a plan take action so that it isn't all on Frye to make or break that play. Something similar to his sweet dish to JR for that open look the other night. It's not going to take long to see what better defensive teams do against his range as we face some pretty tough teams on this road trip. The Celtics immediately come to mind because, hey, they have a big man that can take you outside the arc too!

Best of luck to the team on this road trip, as it is surely going to be a test to see where the team is actually at.

EDIT: I opened this thread anticipating some more comments like the ones on the last page or so. Pretty funny to see that quick turn around from "Why is this guy shooting so many 3's?" to "LET THE RAIN POUR!" haha
Image

Tenacious Spur wrote:Suns did the correct thing letting him go. How they spended their money is the money.


That's money.
aklay1
Freshman
Posts: 95
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 13, 2006

Re: Channing Frye 

Post#34 » by aklay1 » Sun Nov 8, 2009 1:48 pm

LV-Suns wrote:
rsavaj wrote:
aklay1 wrote:A trend that ive noticed starting from preseason, is that Frye is lights out @ home, but shoots atrociously when playing away


I've noticed that too but I'm not sure if that's just my imagination or if the numbers actually back it up.

:lol: Its not your imagination, he shoots much worse on the road. Including the pre-season, he is shooting 25% on the road and 54% at home. Only 3 games on the road though, but he had a 2-10 and 1-9 game in the pre-season.


Yeah, heres his home/away numbers to this point:

Home - 23.5ppg, 66% fg
Away - 8.5ppg, 38% fg

Theres been 2 home games and 4 away games, and theres a huge difference between the teams played @ home vs the teams played away.

Home - GSW, MIN
Away - LAC, MIA, ORL, BOS

I guess we'll just have to see how he's like playing a poor team away and a good team @ home so that we can see whether its the opposition D or whether its being away from home thats having the bigger impact
MontuWillOwnYou
Ballboy
Posts: 4
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 07, 2009

Re: Channing Frye 

Post#35 » by MontuWillOwnYou » Sun Nov 8, 2009 2:15 pm

Also, consider the talent of the opposition in the Orlando and Boston games.
User avatar
lilfishi22
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 36,183
And1: 24,533
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Location: Australia

Re: Channing Frye 

Post#36 » by lilfishi22 » Sun Nov 8, 2009 3:05 pm

PHXfan85 wrote:While the tre is smooth and, apparently, when he is on he's on (at least at home, we will see about the road here these next few games). What I think will be even more deadly than his 3-point shot is what he develops to work off of a defender rushing out to try and defend that shot. You could see him start to work with it on some of his drives off the pump fake, but he looked kinda rough trying to drive to the hoop. I think that will smooth out as time goes on, but I'd really like to see a plan take action so that it isn't all on Frye to make or break that play. Something similar to his sweet dish to JR for that open look the other night. It's not going to take long to see what better defensive teams do against his range as we face some pretty tough teams on this road trip. The Celtics immediately come to mind because, hey, they have a big man that can take you outside the arc too!


I think it's more than enough and still very deadly if he could pump fake the played assigned to him and take the ball to about 15ft and draw in a help defender and either pass inside if he draws the interior help defender or pass to the open 3's if he draws in help from the perimeter.

IMO at 6'11 and with the ability to shoot the 3, he could be an even better pick and pop guy for Nash if he improves his handles and passing. Imagine pick and pop with Nash and Frye. Nash would get the pick and pass off the Frye at the 3 and if the guard switches onto Frye he can just shoot over and if the big stays with Frye, he could take him off the dribble and draw in wing defenders then pass to open man. Kinda like what Amare and Nash does, but instead of becoming the finisher like Amare, he can become a facilitator with the ball in his hand.

Return to Phoenix Suns