Can anyone explain to me how it costed him the $20 mil?

That is a lot of money to lose out on
Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb
SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.
DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.
That Nicka wrote:DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.
No, when he was traded to Houston, Houston obtained his bird rights. Since Houston didnt want to re-sign him, the only way for him to keep his bird rights was through a sign and trade.
Obviously the Lakers/Rockets could have done a sign and trade with Artest/Ariza but it would have cost both teams more money...
I doubt Artest could have made 20 mil more though... maybe 7 mil more (40 mil/5 years) is the most I could have seen a team pay for him
That Nicka wrote:DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.
No, when he was traded to Houston, Houston obtained his bird rights. Since Houston didnt want to re-sign him, the only way for him to keep his bird rights was through a sign and trade.
Obviously the Lakers/Rockets could have done a sign and trade with Artest/Ariza but it would have cost both teams more money...
I doubt Artest could have made 20 mil more though... maybe 7 mil more (40 mil/5 years) is the most I could have seen a team pay for him
DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.
Magicontinues wrote:That Nicka wrote:DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.
No, when he was traded to Houston, Houston obtained his bird rights. Since Houston didnt want to re-sign him, the only way for him to keep his bird rights was through a sign and trade.
Obviously the Lakers/Rockets could have done a sign and trade with Artest/Ariza but it would have cost both teams more money...
I doubt Artest could have made 20 mil more though... maybe 7 mil more (40 mil/5 years) is the most I could have seen a team pay for him
I doubt he would have even gotten 30 mill from another team, I think he was a guy that had a bad reputation, and teams (including Houston) were not going to spend that money on a guy that could hurt them, not help them. Especially in this economy, we overpaid for Artest, he just doesn't know it, I do.
Kobe8Player wrote:[
I doubt he would have even gotten 30 mill from another team, I think he was a guy that had a bad reputation, and teams (including Houston) were not going to spend that money on a guy that could hurt them, not help them. Especially in this economy, we overpaid for Artest, he just doesn't know it, I do.[/
I don't like his comments at all but gosh what's wrong with you ? He has gotten better every game and he's been exactly what I wanted from him today and yesterday. You guys really think we would be better with Ariza right now ? No way.
dcash4 wrote:ron is wrong. why would anyone (rockets or in a sign n trade) sign ron to 5 yr 54 mil deal? certainly not the rockets even if they were going to keep him with his bird rights. he simply wasn't worth 10 mil a yr with someone like ariza available for much less.
Kobe8Player wrote:I don't like his comments at all but gosh what's wrong with you ? He has gotten better every game and he's been exactly what I wanted from him today and yesterday. You guys really think we would be better with Ariza right now ? No way.
SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
iki4life wrote:ron will be fine in LA...although ariza was just a better fit for our team.
snaquille oatmeal wrote:.