ImageImageImageImageImage

Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

User avatar
Tommy Trojan
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,447
And1: 36
Joined: Aug 19, 2006
Location: Los Angeles

Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million 

Post#1 » by Tommy Trojan » Thu Nov 5, 2009 4:38 pm

Per wiretap: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million

Can anyone explain to me how it costed him the $20 mil? :o

That is a lot of money to lose out on
User avatar
DEEP3CL
RealGM
Posts: 27,899
And1: 3,207
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
     

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million 

Post#2 » by DEEP3CL » Thu Nov 5, 2009 4:54 pm

He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.
VETERAN LAKERS FAN

SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
Magicontinues
Banned User
Posts: 823
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 11, 2009

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million 

Post#3 » by Magicontinues » Thu Nov 5, 2009 5:18 pm

DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.


He's not a smart man, should have kept Ariza. Just zip it Ron, and play ball for the team you said you have always wanted to play for.
User avatar
TruSkool
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,706
And1: 253
Joined: Jun 01, 2007
 

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million 

Post#4 » by TruSkool » Thu Nov 5, 2009 5:51 pm

ron will be fine in LA...although ariza was just a better fit for our team.
That Nicka
Banned User
Posts: 15,350
And1: 34
Joined: Jun 28, 2005
Location: USC

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million 

Post#5 » by That Nicka » Thu Nov 5, 2009 5:55 pm

DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.



No, when he was traded to Houston, Houston obtained his bird rights. Since Houston didnt want to re-sign him, the only way for him to keep his bird rights was through a sign and trade.

Obviously the Lakers/Rockets could have done a sign and trade with Artest/Ariza but it would have cost both teams more money...

I doubt Artest could have made 20 mil more though... maybe 7 mil more (40 mil/5 years) is the most I could have seen a team pay for him
User avatar
TonyMontana
RealGM
Posts: 11,726
And1: 398
Joined: Apr 27, 2006
Location: Loungin in the Cali sun.
     

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million 

Post#6 » by TonyMontana » Thu Nov 5, 2009 5:57 pm

That Nicka wrote:
DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.



No, when he was traded to Houston, Houston obtained his bird rights. Since Houston didnt want to re-sign him, the only way for him to keep his bird rights was through a sign and trade.

Obviously the Lakers/Rockets could have done a sign and trade with Artest/Ariza but it would have cost both teams more money...

I doubt Artest could have made 20 mil more though... maybe 7 mil more (40 mil/5 years) is the most I could have seen a team pay for him

I agree
Image
Magicontinues
Banned User
Posts: 823
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 11, 2009

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million 

Post#7 » by Magicontinues » Thu Nov 5, 2009 6:11 pm

That Nicka wrote:
DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.



No, when he was traded to Houston, Houston obtained his bird rights. Since Houston didnt want to re-sign him, the only way for him to keep his bird rights was through a sign and trade.

Obviously the Lakers/Rockets could have done a sign and trade with Artest/Ariza but it would have cost both teams more money...

I doubt Artest could have made 20 mil more though... maybe 7 mil more (40 mil/5 years) is the most I could have seen a team pay for him



I doubt he would have even gotten 30 mill from another team, I think he was a guy that had a bad reputation, and teams (including Houston) were not going to spend that money on a guy that could hurt them, not help them. Especially in this economy, we overpaid for Artest, he just doesn't know it, I do.
tkb
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,759
And1: 198
Joined: Mar 19, 2005
Location: Norway
   

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million 

Post#8 » by tkb » Thu Nov 5, 2009 6:13 pm

DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.


That's incorrect. He lost his Bird rights when Houston decided not to re-sign him or sign and trade him.
Blackfyre
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,106
And1: 1,498
Joined: Aug 04, 2005
Location: Estonia
     

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million 

Post#9 » by Blackfyre » Thu Nov 5, 2009 6:28 pm

Magicontinues wrote:
That Nicka wrote:
DEEP3CL wrote:He lost his "Bird Rights" when he was traded to Houston.



No, when he was traded to Houston, Houston obtained his bird rights. Since Houston didnt want to re-sign him, the only way for him to keep his bird rights was through a sign and trade.

Obviously the Lakers/Rockets could have done a sign and trade with Artest/Ariza but it would have cost both teams more money...

I doubt Artest could have made 20 mil more though... maybe 7 mil more (40 mil/5 years) is the most I could have seen a team pay for him



I doubt he would have even gotten 30 mill from another team, I think he was a guy that had a bad reputation, and teams (including Houston) were not going to spend that money on a guy that could hurt them, not help them. Especially in this economy, we overpaid for Artest, he just doesn't know it, I do.

I don't like his comments at all but gosh what's wrong with you ? He has gotten better every game and he's been exactly what I wanted from him today and yesterday. You guys really think we would be better with Ariza right now ? No way.
Magicontinues
Banned User
Posts: 823
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 11, 2009

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million 

Post#10 » by Magicontinues » Thu Nov 5, 2009 6:48 pm

Kobe8Player wrote:[

I doubt he would have even gotten 30 mill from another team, I think he was a guy that had a bad reputation, and teams (including Houston) were not going to spend that money on a guy that could hurt them, not help them. Especially in this economy, we overpaid for Artest, he just doesn't know it, I do.[/
I don't like his comments at all but gosh what's wrong with you ? He has gotten better every game and he's been exactly what I wanted from him today and yesterday. You guys really think we would be better with Ariza right now ? No way.



I've never liked the guy, this is not something new for me to rip him. And when he says stupid things like he said in this article IE "the Lakers werent' my first choice", and "I lost 20 million" I just cringe, because he said just a couple months ago he's always wanted to be a Laker, and my thoughts about him being delusional and not good for any team resurface. We need/needed smart players to win rings, I hope he proves me wrong in that he can help us win more, but the dude is just not a smart guy, and that scares me having a dumb guy on my team.

Prove me wrong Artest, but in the meantime, just STFU and play ball would ya!!! :x :censored: :censored:
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million 

Post#11 » by dockingsched » Thu Nov 5, 2009 6:55 pm

ron is wrong. why would anyone (rockets or in a sign n trade) sign ron to 5 yr 54 mil deal? certainly not the rockets even if they were going to keep him with his bird rights. he simply wasn't worth 10 mil a yr with someone like ariza available for much less.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
User avatar
lakersfanatic
Pro Prospect
Posts: 989
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 08, 2008

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million 

Post#12 » by lakersfanatic » Thu Nov 5, 2009 7:20 pm

that's ron being ron... always trying to add his own words into everything lol. I'm glad they played it out on court yesterday, it was fun to watch them battle it out eventhough they said it wasn't.

This comments basically shows he didn't mean to leave rockets in the cold like that. Just that they weren't going to give him what he wants.. actually no team would... so the next best is to take less and have a good run at a championship.
fareweatherfan
Senior
Posts: 663
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 24, 2008

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million 

Post#13 » by fareweatherfan » Thu Nov 5, 2009 7:35 pm

dcash4 wrote:ron is wrong. why would anyone (rockets or in a sign n trade) sign ron to 5 yr 54 mil deal? certainly not the rockets even if they were going to keep him with his bird rights. he simply wasn't worth 10 mil a yr with someone like ariza available for much less.


Bingo. He got the most any team was willing to pay.
User avatar
TonyMontana
RealGM
Posts: 11,726
And1: 398
Joined: Apr 27, 2006
Location: Loungin in the Cali sun.
     

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million 

Post#14 » by TonyMontana » Thu Nov 5, 2009 7:43 pm

Kobe8Player wrote:I don't like his comments at all but gosh what's wrong with you ? He has gotten better every game and he's been exactly what I wanted from him today and yesterday. You guys really think we would be better with Ariza right now ? No way.

Not at all. Im more than satisfied with Artest. Dont be shocked though Artest is going to basically be the ecape goat for everything that goes wrong with this team. You can already see that happening.
Image
User avatar
DEEP3CL
RealGM
Posts: 27,899
And1: 3,207
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
     

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million 

Post#15 » by DEEP3CL » Thu Nov 5, 2009 9:28 pm

It won't matter anyway, the next CBA won't favor the players in any shape form or fashion.......book it.
They're going to do away with a lot of the loopholes exposed over this decade.

Be happy Ron with what you got.......cause it'll be more than what these guys get from here on out.
VETERAN LAKERS FAN

SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
SApuro_
Rookie
Posts: 1,147
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million 

Post#16 » by SApuro_ » Fri Nov 6, 2009 2:09 am

That's good that only 1% of him wishes to be somewhere else. Has to be reassuring as a Laker fan that 99% of him is focused to win a championship and not about numbers or money.
User avatar
snaquille oatmeal
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,817
And1: 4,819
Joined: Nov 15, 2005
Location: San Diego
   

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million 

Post#17 » by snaquille oatmeal » Fri Nov 6, 2009 2:22 am

iki4life wrote:ron will be fine in LA...although ariza was just a better fit for our team.

why do people keep saying that. it has not been proven that Ariza is a better fit because Ron has only played 4 games with the Lakers. after the playoffs we will know if Ariza was a better fit.
Forum permissions
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot trade for basketball reasons in this forum
You cannot but I can...five rings!
User avatar
TonyMontana
RealGM
Posts: 11,726
And1: 398
Joined: Apr 27, 2006
Location: Loungin in the Cali sun.
     

Re: Artest Believes Losing Bird Rights Cost Him $20 Million 

Post#18 » by TonyMontana » Fri Nov 6, 2009 2:29 am

snaquille oatmeal wrote:.


Snaq I couldnt reply to you, but Im straight but for the life in me Im trying and its really hard specially when it keeps on coming. But Im cool. :wink: Thanks for the headsup. MY BAD.
Image

Return to Los Angeles Lakers