Image Image Image Image

PG: The Bears are who we thought they were

Moderator: chitownsports4ever

SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

PG: The Bears are who we thought they were 

Post#1 » by SportsWorld » Sun Nov 8, 2009 9:09 pm

Good:
Cutler
Hester
Olsen

Bad:
Defense
Tommie Harris (You're a moron)
Coaching
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

Re: PG: The Bears are who we thought they were 

Post#2 » by WEFFPIM » Sun Nov 8, 2009 9:10 pm

That went well!
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

Re: PG: The Bears are who we thought they were 

Post#3 » by SportsWorld » Sun Nov 8, 2009 9:13 pm

Anxiously awaiting Lovie's press conference. I'm sure he'll say a whole lot of nothing.
"We're going to forget this game and look forward to Thursday"
"We outscored them in the second half so that was encouraging"
"Our defense has to get better"

yawn.
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

Re: PG: The Bears are who we thought they were 

Post#4 » by SportsWorld » Sun Nov 8, 2009 9:16 pm

They just flashed a stat on Bears Postgame Live on Comcast SportsNet.

First half:
vs Bengals
Points Allowed 31
Total Yards 292
3rd Down 4-5

vs Cardinals
Points Allowed 31
Total Yards 320
3rd Down 6-6
User avatar
Balance-a-Bull
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,347
And1: 2
Joined: Mar 28, 2006
Location: Somewhere angry and lost in the Bulls brass psyche, where offense is an afterthought

Re: PG: The Bears are who we thought they were 

Post#5 » by Balance-a-Bull » Sun Nov 8, 2009 9:17 pm

"Re: PG: The Bears are who we thought they were"

That highlight with Dennis Green is still hilarious.
A plea for post scoring is a plausible Bulls plan, but plainly isn't a priority. In response to a post player's dismay about his lack of points in the paint, Paxson said.... "I'm not nearly as concerned about the offensive stuff as he is."
User avatar
Susan
RealGM
Posts: 21,451
And1: 7,857
Joined: Jan 25, 2005
Location: jackfinn & Scott May appreciation society
     

Re: PG: The Bears are who we thought they were 

Post#6 » by Susan » Sun Nov 8, 2009 9:19 pm

At least we didn't lose to the Bucs.
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

Re: PG: The Bears are who we thought they were 

Post#7 » by SportsWorld » Sun Nov 8, 2009 9:30 pm

Susan wrote:At least we didn't lose to the Bucs.

Yeah right. I thought Aaron Rodgers was supposed to be an MVP candidate. He's been very disappointing.
Ricky ROY Rubio
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,556
And1: 498
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
Location: Chicago
       

Re: PG: The Bears are who we thought they were 

Post#8 » by Ricky ROY Rubio » Sun Nov 8, 2009 9:37 pm

the defense without harris has been terrible.
eye test>cherry picked empty stats
User avatar
Susan
RealGM
Posts: 21,451
And1: 7,857
Joined: Jan 25, 2005
Location: jackfinn & Scott May appreciation society
     

Re: PG: The Bears are who we thought they were 

Post#9 » by Susan » Sun Nov 8, 2009 9:46 pm

SportsWorld wrote:
Susan wrote:At least we didn't lose to the Bucs.

Yeah right. I thought Aaron Rodgers was supposed to be an MVP candidate. He's been very disappointing.


No. He's on pace for 32 TDs and 4500 yards. That's far from disappointing.
fisher
Junior
Posts: 457
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 17, 2008

Re: PG: The Bears are who we thought they were 

Post#10 » by fisher » Sun Nov 8, 2009 10:17 pm

And here I thought the Bears would have at least made a game of it (boy, was I wrong). Terrible defense, stupid penalties, special teams gaffs, etc. How did this team beat Pittsburgh?
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

Re: PG: The Bears are who we thought they were 

Post#11 » by SportsWorld » Sun Nov 8, 2009 10:27 pm

fisher wrote: How did this team beat Pittsburgh?

Image
Image
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

Re: PG: The Bears are who we thought they were 

Post#12 » by SportsWorld » Sun Nov 8, 2009 10:37 pm

Image Image
User avatar
blumeany
RealGM
Posts: 16,670
And1: 2,551
Joined: Feb 05, 2003
Location: Chicago
       

Re: PG: The Bears are who we thought they were 

Post#13 » by blumeany » Sun Nov 8, 2009 11:39 pm

In a word? Atrocious. How Lovie can come out and gleam any kind of hope or lesson out of this game is beyond me. GM is a fail, Coaching staff is a fail, personnel is a fail. Blow it up.
2024: Maybe there's some hope?
User avatar
Friend_Of_Haley
RealGM
Posts: 10,139
And1: 374
Joined: Aug 16, 2003
Location: Locked Out

Re: PG: The Bears are who we thought they were 

Post#14 » by Friend_Of_Haley » Mon Nov 9, 2009 12:15 am

SportsWorld wrote:
fisher wrote: How did this team beat Pittsburgh?

images of Jeff Reed

Good point, except this Bears team we have seen the past couple weeks doesn't even keep people out of the endzone. FG kickers haven't even had the chance to blow it for their teams lately.
Image
User avatar
Balance-a-Bull
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,347
And1: 2
Joined: Mar 28, 2006
Location: Somewhere angry and lost in the Bulls brass psyche, where offense is an afterthought

Re: PG: The Bears are who we thought they were 

Post#15 » by Balance-a-Bull » Mon Nov 9, 2009 12:32 am

The Bears actually played pretty well in the 2nd half on both sides of the ball.

If we can pick-up where we left off .......maybe we can salvage some sense of dignity for the rest of the season.

Let's hope.
A plea for post scoring is a plausible Bulls plan, but plainly isn't a priority. In response to a post player's dismay about his lack of points in the paint, Paxson said.... "I'm not nearly as concerned about the offensive stuff as he is."
User avatar
Friend_Of_Haley
RealGM
Posts: 10,139
And1: 374
Joined: Aug 16, 2003
Location: Locked Out

Re: PG: The Bears are who we thought they were 

Post#16 » by Friend_Of_Haley » Mon Nov 9, 2009 12:41 am

Balance-a-Bull wrote:The Bears actually played pretty well in the 2nd half on both sides of the ball.

If we can pick-up where we left off .......maybe we can salvage some sense of dignity for the rest of the season.

Let's hope.

I don't want dignity. I want heads to roll. My dignity would be a brand new coaching staff and GM. Dignity will mean 7-9, mediocrity, and the same old thing next year.
Image
fisher
Junior
Posts: 457
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 17, 2008

Re: PG: The Bears are who we thought they were 

Post#17 » by fisher » Mon Nov 9, 2009 1:26 am

Friend_Of_Haley wrote:
Balance-a-Bull wrote:The Bears actually played pretty well in the 2nd half on both sides of the ball.

If we can pick-up where we left off .......maybe we can salvage some sense of dignity for the rest of the season.

Let's hope.

I don't want dignity. I want heads to roll. My dignity would be a brand new coaching staff and GM. Dignity will mean 7-9, mediocrity, and the same old thing next year.


Not if history is any indication. Dick Jauron (who Lovie replaced) was fired after a 7-9 season and he had far less expectations to meet than Lovie Smith does now. The only question is whether the McKaskeys would want to eat the last years of his contract.
User avatar
Purple Palace
Rookie
Posts: 1,116
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 16, 2008
Location: Arizona
     

Re: PG: The Bears are who we thought they were 

Post#18 » by Purple Palace » Mon Nov 9, 2009 3:24 am

SportsWorld wrote:
Susan wrote:At least we didn't lose to the Bucs.

Yeah right. I thought Aaron Rodgers was supposed to be an MVP candidate. He's been very disappointing.

With the line he has, he's still playing extremely well. Arguably one of the best QB's so far. Today was mediocre, though. 3 turnovers.
User avatar
blumeany
RealGM
Posts: 16,670
And1: 2,551
Joined: Feb 05, 2003
Location: Chicago
       

Re: PG: The Bears are who we thought they were 

Post#19 » by blumeany » Mon Nov 9, 2009 12:49 pm

Yeah, it's especially sad when you consider that a couple of our wins were due to kickers missing easy kicks, then a few more were versus teams like Detroit and the Browns. :(
2024: Maybe there's some hope?

Return to Chicago Bears