ImageImage

Screw You, San Fransisco

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
MikeIsGood
RealGM
Posts: 35,765
And1: 11,652
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: Vamos Rafa
     

Screw You, San Fransisco 

Post#1 » by MikeIsGood » Tue Oct 23, 2007 5:40 pm

If the draft were to be held today, the NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS would be selecting FIFTH.

http://www.gbnreport.com/weeklydraftorder.htm

Packers would be picking 29th, but that's a good thing. Means we're winning :D
bigrich88
Junior
Posts: 458
And1: 3
Joined: Sep 25, 2007

 

Post#2 » by bigrich88 » Tue Oct 23, 2007 5:44 pm

yea and ted thompson does solid with his drafts so we can get a starter at the end of round 1. but all i care about is that we keep winning lol worry about the draft later in the season.
EastSideBucksFan
RealGM
Posts: 18,710
And1: 4,490
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Contact:
 

 

Post#3 » by EastSideBucksFan » Tue Oct 23, 2007 6:08 pm

bigrich88 wrote:yea and ted thompson does solid with his drafts so we can get a starter at the end of round 1. but all i care about is that we keep winning lol worry about the draft later in the season.



Yeah, cause Justin Harrell has just been a stud so far.


:roll:
bigrich88
Junior
Posts: 458
And1: 3
Joined: Sep 25, 2007

 

Post#4 » by bigrich88 » Tue Oct 23, 2007 6:11 pm

EastSideBucksFan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-




Yeah, cause Justin Harrell has just been a stud so far.


:roll:



good one..not. last time i checked people don't really evaluate draft picks their first year. the real evaluations start the 3rd year. so come back with the negative comments in a season or 2. but before you do actually give the guy a chance to play.
User avatar
BuckFan25226
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,707
And1: 1,091
Joined: Jan 30, 2006
Location: Wauwatosa, WI

 

Post#5 » by BuckFan25226 » Tue Oct 23, 2007 7:22 pm

EastSideBucksFan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-




Yeah, cause Justin Harrell has just been a stud so far.


:roll:


Justin Harrell was not picked to contribute in any kind of significant way this year. I thought this was common knowledge amongst Packer nation, I guess not.
"didnt you watch the game with the raptors?bucks is also a playoff team ,they have enough ability to find wins from dalas and utach,
blow jazzs bitches and mavericks bitches out !"

- yiyiyi
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,146
And1: 15,023
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

 

Post#6 » by Ayt » Wed Oct 24, 2007 3:20 am

I think we'll see more of Harrell as the season progresses. My guess is he'll play even if Cole is healthy.

I like what I've seen from him the past two games. He had some trouble when doubled, but against single blocking he moves extremely well for a DT.
User avatar
DelaneyRudd
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 104,541
And1: 9,469
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
     

 

Post#7 » by DelaneyRudd » Wed Oct 24, 2007 3:26 am

In 3 years Peterson will be an oft injured big name guy while Harrell will be a quiet big time contributer.
User avatar
th87
RealGM
Posts: 11,633
And1: 13,721
Joined: Dec 04, 2005

 

Post#8 » by th87 » Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:30 am

Harrell wasn't a bad move. You can never have too many good D-lineman.

A bad move was letting the most talented WR of all time get away. That sucked. And I wonder what it would take for the blind loyalists to accept that fact, given the GM himself has expressed regret with respect to this.
eagle13
Head Coach
Posts: 6,145
And1: 107
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Location: san diego

 

Post#9 » by eagle13 » Wed Oct 24, 2007 11:54 am

BuckFan25226 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Justin Harrell was not picked to contribute in any kind of significant way this year. I thought this was common knowledge amongst Packer nation, I guess not.


I am not criticizing the pick (not thrilled with it either) but your statement is not true. Harrell was listed as a starting DT next to Pickett comming into camp. That was no fluke as it had to take thought and intention to list him ahead of starter Corey Williams and other vets like Jolly and Cole.

But then he failed his sprints (with Jolly) but never recoverd unlike Jolly.

Harrell may yet contribute big time -but he was expected to help this season.
bigrich88
Junior
Posts: 458
And1: 3
Joined: Sep 25, 2007

 

Post#10 » by bigrich88 » Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:05 pm

eagle13 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I am not criticizing the pick (not thrilled with it either) but your statement is not true. Harrell was listed as a starting DT next to Pickett comming into camp. That was no fluke as it had to take thought and intention to list him ahead of starter Corey Williams and other vets like Jolly and Cole.

But then he failed his sprints (with Jolly) but never recoverd unlike Jolly.

Harrell may yet contribute big time -but he was expected to help this season.


he was not really expected to do too much this season because of the biceps injury he suffered last season. in the last few games played he has done a good job and i think he will only get better every game. so you saying that about him was not called for because it was unknowledgeable. before you say that about someone give him time to play, and make sure you know stuff about him before you state something. he did not play much in the beginning of the season because he was still recovering from the biceps injury but lately he has been getting more and more playing time and is doing solid. he will be starting next season and will have a great year and it will be the start of a great career.
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

 

Post#11 » by xTitan » Wed Oct 24, 2007 3:52 pm

The emergence of Johnny Jolly was unexpected but also a great thing....proves the drafter has a good eye and allows Harrell time to develop..............its about acquiring talent, who cares about what round the man was drafted, Wolf made a living in rounds 3-7.
eagle13
Head Coach
Posts: 6,145
And1: 107
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Location: san diego

 

Post#12 » by eagle13 » Wed Oct 24, 2007 9:38 pm

bigrich88 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

he was not really expected to do too much this season because of the biceps injury he suffered last season. in the last few games played he has done a good job and i think he will only get better every game. so you saying that about him was not called for because it was unknowledgeable. before you say that about someone give him time to play, and make sure you know stuff about him before you state something. he did not play much in the beginning of the season because he was still recovering from the biceps injury but lately he has been getting more and more playing time and is doing solid. he will be starting next season and will have a great year and it will be the start of a great career.


What's your blabber about?

I said nothin negative about Harrell. I just said that PAck had Harrell as a starting DT on thier depth chart at start of season. We all know that's true if you were following. So if he was a projected starter they expected something from him this year. That is in contrast with BuckPack's statement that the Pack weren't expecting much from him THIS season.

He may of course still pan out in the future - even yet this year.

So whats the problem?
User avatar
Neusch23
Head Coach
Posts: 7,250
And1: 59
Joined: Jul 04, 2005
Location: Green Bay
     

 

Post#13 » by Neusch23 » Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:10 pm

I look at it this way.

Do I believe that he was looked at to play a fairly big role this season? Yes.

Does he need to now that others have stepped up? No.

Is this bad? No.

Because now he can fully heal and injury that takes time to heal and he can continue to learn and be of help in the future.

If there is a place to have depth it is JH's position.

Return to Green Bay Packers