ImageImageImage

Monta Ellis (In case GSW doesn't care bout his D)

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
old rem
RealGM
Posts: 50,753
And1: 1,080
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Location: Witness Protection

Re: Monta Ellis (In case GSW doesn't care bout his D) 

Post#21 » by old rem » Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:55 am

cpfsf wrote:
revprodeji wrote:I think he is a good kid in a bad spot. Talent wise he would be nice with Rubio, but he is not worth the contract he has. He needs a new team bad.


His attitude makes me cringe

"Coach, why do I get blamed for everything"
"I'm not going to put any more on my back. Somebody else is going to have to step up and take on the role. Now, who have we got that's going to play defense? We've got me. Who else?"
"Look at me on my moped weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"

...ok I made that last one up. Still, the only way I would even consider Ellis to be a possibility is if Rubio was on the squad. Part of it has to do with the fact that Flynn, Ellis, and Jefferson would be pretty small at their respective positions and the other part is that I don't think that lineup would result in good chemistry.


Nelson wanted Ellis to be a leader,made him Captain Ellis got on players in the locker room,in particular telling some of the young guys to learn the plays,telling everyone to get more committed on D, Nellie however...pulled the rug out ,told him be quiet. So...again Monta gets the mixed message and no-win situation as he'd been PG apprentice a couple years, but much of the time Jackson hogged the ball and Ellis got blamed for not getting assist. Hell...he was lucky to get touches.

At GSW the main guys seem to always get dumped on, J Rich, Baron, Dun, Murphy,Harrington,Pietrus, Jackson, Crawford....now Ellis. Guys follow the damn script and they take the rap when the script sucks. It's how Nellie keeps his ass in business. The pawns get sacrificed. Eventually, he uses up the pawns and moves on.

Anyhow...IF (big if...) GSW was smart, they keep Ellis and unload Nelson. In context...nothing Ellis said was anything but telling it as it is. That's rare enough nobody gets it.
CENSORED... No comment.
User avatar
WarFan
RealGM
Posts: 14,030
And1: 1,507
Joined: Jul 30, 2007
Location: Aptos, CA
     

Re: Monta Ellis (In case GSW doesn't care bout his D) 

Post#22 » by WarFan » Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:24 am

old rem wrote:
cpfsf wrote:
revprodeji wrote:I think he is a good kid in a bad spot. Talent wise he would be nice with Rubio, but he is not worth the contract he has. He needs a new team bad.


His attitude makes me cringe

"Coach, why do I get blamed for everything"
"I'm not going to put any more on my back. Somebody else is going to have to step up and take on the role. Now, who have we got that's going to play defense? We've got me. Who else?"
"Look at me on my moped weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"

...ok I made that last one up. Still, the only way I would even consider Ellis to be a possibility is if Rubio was on the squad. Part of it has to do with the fact that Flynn, Ellis, and Jefferson would be pretty small at their respective positions and the other part is that I don't think that lineup would result in good chemistry.


Nelson wanted Ellis to be a leader,made him Captain Ellis got on players in the locker room,in particular telling some of the young guys to learn the plays,telling everyone to get more committed on D, Nellie however...pulled the rug out ,told him be quiet. So...again Monta gets the mixed message and no-win situation as he'd been PG apprentice a couple years, but much of the time Jackson hogged the ball and Ellis got blamed for not getting assist. Hell...he was lucky to get touches.

At GSW the main guys seem to always get dumped on, J Rich, Baron, Dun, Murphy,Harrington,Pietrus, Jackson, Crawford....now Ellis. Guys follow the damn script and they take the rap when the script sucks. It's how Nellie keeps his ass in business. The pawns get sacrificed. Eventually, he uses up the pawns and moves on.

Anyhow...IF (big if...) GSW was smart, they keep Ellis and unload Nelson. In context...nothing Ellis said was anything but telling it as it is. That's rare enough nobody gets it.

Holy crap! It's an intelligent rem post, and I only had to go to Minnesota to find it!
Narf
Head Coach
Posts: 6,550
And1: 882
Joined: Sep 05, 2009

Re: Monta Ellis (In case GSW doesn't care bout his D) 

Post#23 » by Narf » Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:33 pm

The only deal that even gave me pause for Ellis was Randolph + Ellis for Al Jefferson. Throw in Gomes for Morrow and I bite on that.
funkatron101
General Manager
Posts: 7,741
And1: 1,177
Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Location: St. Paul

Re: Monta Ellis (In case GSW doesn't care bout his D) 

Post#24 » by funkatron101 » Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:57 pm

Narf wrote:The only deal that even gave me pause for Ellis was Randolph + Ellis for Al Jefferson. Throw in Gomes for Morrow and I bite on that.

No way the Warriors do that though.
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: Monta Ellis (In case GSW doesn't care bout his D) 

Post#25 » by Devilzsidewalk » Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:20 pm

Don Nelson would
Image
User avatar
old rem
RealGM
Posts: 50,753
And1: 1,080
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Location: Witness Protection

Re: Monta Ellis (In case GSW doesn't care bout his D) 

Post#26 » by old rem » Sat Nov 21, 2009 10:31 am

J_Era_3 wrote:I was just using him as an example of an undersized SG, who thinks he can play PG, with no D

no more of these tweeners


Tell that to Brandon Roy. Ellis dominated him tonight.....34 pt,8 asst,6 steals. Ellis' D on Roy pretty much took Roy out of the game. Of course...any thought GSW had about trading him is gone now.

Nellie won't part with Morrow either. Both Ellis + Morrow played all 48 min in the win over Port, Morrow had over 20 pt and rained 3's on the Blazers
CENSORED... No comment.
User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: Monta Ellis (In case GSW doesn't care bout his D) 

Post#27 » by Esohny » Sat Nov 21, 2009 2:58 pm

Oh no, Monta had one good game and it's now less likely that we'd be able to trade for his awful contract.

Fate, why do you mock us so?
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
User avatar
old rem
RealGM
Posts: 50,753
And1: 1,080
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Location: Witness Protection

Re: Monta Ellis (In case GSW doesn't care bout his D) 

Post#28 » by old rem » Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:40 am

I think it's a plus to have our top player signed up for 5 yr. At the end of the deal he's 28-29 yr old.
I'm sure Toronto wishes there best player was signed for 5.

You could look it up.....he's had a lot of good games,but this had something extra,in that he answered everyone who'd been trying to put limits on what he can do. Surprised a lot of GSW fans too. He's gonna have a real good season.
CENSORED... No comment.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,288
And1: 19,301
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Monta Ellis (In case GSW doesn't care bout his D) 

Post#29 » by shrink » Mon Nov 23, 2009 2:18 pm

old rem wrote:I think it's a plus to have our top player signed up for 5 yr. At the end of the deal he's 28-29 yr old.


And at the end of the deal, GSW has spent $55 mil dollars.

Whether he's the best player on GSW or not, I personally don't think Monta Ellis is worth $11 mil/year, when you compare him to the other new contract offers when he signed. The problem is that he needs to be his absolute best to have a chance of bringing you back $11 mil in production, and there's no upside there. However, with a 5-year deal, the risk of injury to any player produces downside for guaranteed NBA contracts. For Monta, he probably should have been offered a contract for $2 mil less, or certainly less years. GSW seems to lock themselves up with longterm deals like this far too often, imo.
BW32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,307
And1: 761
Joined: Nov 08, 2009

Re: Monta Ellis (In case GSW doesn't care bout his D) 

Post#30 » by BW32 » Mon Nov 23, 2009 5:27 pm

shrink wrote:
old rem wrote:I think it's a plus to have our top player signed up for 5 yr. At the end of the deal he's 28-29 yr old.


And at the end of the deal, GSW has spent $55 mil dollars.

Whether he's the best player on GSW or not, I personally don't think Monta Ellis is worth $11 mil/year, when you compare him to the other new contract offers when he signed. The problem is that he needs to be his absolute best to have a chance of bringing you back $11 mil in production, and there's no upside there. However, with a 5-year deal, the risk of injury to any player produces downside for guaranteed NBA contracts. For Monta, he probably should have been offered a contract for $2 mil less, or certainly less years. GSW seems to lock themselves up with longterm deals like this far too often, imo.


There is more to basketball players than dollar signs. If you always wait to sign people for the "fair" price you'll end up not signing anyone. If you build an entire team on "bargain" contracts like a Ryan Gomes or a Kelenna Azubuike you'll end up with a mediocre at best team.

He scores 20 on a fairly high percentage (though his J has been off so far this season) that doesn't come cheap. The year Monta signed Smoove signed a very large contract, so did Elton Brand and Baron Davis, Iggy too and let's not even mention Gilbert Arenas. There were no bargain contract that year, not for a player with his talent level.
User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: Monta Ellis (In case GSW doesn't care bout his D) 

Post#31 » by Esohny » Mon Nov 23, 2009 5:38 pm

So we ignore the fact that his contract is terrible because it's not quite as franchise choking awful as the Arenas contract?
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
BW32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,307
And1: 761
Joined: Nov 08, 2009

Re: Monta Ellis (In case GSW doesn't care bout his D) 

Post#32 » by BW32 » Mon Nov 23, 2009 5:53 pm

Esohny wrote:So we ignore the fact that his contract is terrible because it's not quite as franchise choking awful as the Arenas contract?


*sigh* I din't comment on the trade at any point I was just responding to the comment that Monta's contract was somehow inflated when compared with other contracts signed at the time he signed. It's pretty clear the trade does nothing for either team, Wolves are't a Monta Ellis away from contention and if M onta is to be traded eventually it won't be for another PG.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,288
And1: 19,301
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Monta Ellis (In case GSW doesn't care bout his D) 

Post#33 » by shrink » Mon Nov 23, 2009 6:08 pm

BW32 wrote: There is more to basketball players than dollar signs. If you always wait to sign people for the "fair" price you'll end up not signing anyone. If you build an entire team on "bargain" contracts like a Ryan Gomes or a Kelenna Azubuike you'll end up with a mediocre at best team.

He scores 20 on a fairly high percentage (though his J has been off so far this season) that doesn't come cheap. The year Monta signed Smoove signed a very large contract, so did Elton Brand and Baron Davis, Iggy too and let's not even mention Gilbert Arenas. There were no bargain contract that year, not for a player with his talent level.


Danny Granger, Al Jefferson, Devin Harris ($7.8), JR Smith, Biedrins, I'd even say Kevin Martin at $8.7 are all better contracts. Personally, I'd rather have a big man like Okafor at $9.5 too. Contracts at $13.7, in the Monta range, should go to ELITE players, max deals like Chris Paul, Deron Williams, and Dwight Howard. These young players are a better comparison for Monta, rather than ex-All Stars like Brand and Baron Davis.

We may differ on how you project Monta Ellis, but a roster clogged with $8-11 mil swingmen, not only from a cap standpoint, but in longterm flexibility as well. GSW should understand that better than any team in the league. You should only be happy with overpaying to get that little extra talent if its going to put you over the top.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Monta Ellis (In case GSW doesn't care bout his D) 

Post#34 » by Krapinsky » Mon Nov 23, 2009 6:11 pm

I'd rather have Ben Gordon than Monta too. Rather have a shooter who is clutch in our offense. Gordon is only 26 too.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
BW32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,307
And1: 761
Joined: Nov 08, 2009

Re: Monta Ellis (In case GSW doesn't care bout his D) 

Post#35 » by BW32 » Mon Nov 23, 2009 6:22 pm

shrink wrote:
BW32 wrote: There is more to basketball players than dollar signs. If you always wait to sign people for the "fair" price you'll end up not signing anyone. If you build an entire team on "bargain" contracts like a Ryan Gomes or a Kelenna Azubuike you'll end up with a mediocre at best team.

He scores 20 on a fairly high percentage (though his J has been off so far this season) that doesn't come cheap. The year Monta signed Smoove signed a very large contract, so did Elton Brand and Baron Davis, Iggy too and let's not even mention Gilbert Arenas. There were no bargain contract that year, not for a player with his talent level.


Danny Granger, Al Jefferson, Devin Harris ($7.8), JR Smith, Biedrins, I'd even say Kevin Martin at $8.7 are all better contracts. Personally, I'd rather have a big man like Okafor at $9.5 too. Contracts at $13.7, in the Monta range, should go to ELITE players, max deals like Chris Paul, Deron Williams, and Dwight Howard. These young players are a better comparison for Monta, rather than ex-All Stars like Brand and Baron Davis.

We may differ on how you project Monta Ellis, but a roster clogged with $8-11 mil swingmen, not only from a cap standpoint, but in longterm flexibility as well. GSW should understand that better than any team in the league. You should only be happy with overpaying to get that little extra talent if its going to put you over the top.


You see that's unfair, you compare Martin's 8.7 starting year salary to Monta's 11 mil when in fact Martin signed a 5/55 deal, the same 11 mil a year average that Monta got, same thing for Granger or Al. Granger's deal is around the 12 mil mark on average and Al's is around 13. I understand if you don't think Monta is worth his deal, I disagree but understand, but if we are to compare salaries it should be done properly.

For the record Okafor's contract also averages over the 12 a year mark and Monta's contract is 11 flat per year, not 13.7 mil his contract also, to my understanding, does not contain any incentives.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves