ImageImageImage

Keep Jefferson, Trade Love for Randolph

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
mandurugo
Starter
Posts: 2,120
And1: 231
Joined: Aug 14, 2002

Re: Keep Jefferson, Trade Love for Randolph 

Post#21 » by mandurugo » Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:50 pm

I think you guys are a little too fond of Love. He's a good player, but hardly someone you can't trade. He's not a fan draw, he hasn't turned around the fortunes of the team, what keeps him from the trading block? I'm not saying he has to go or that he should be given away, but if Rambis' concerns about the ability for the two guys to play together is right, of course you trade either Love or Jefferson for the right offer. I get that some people don't think this is it, but is there any offer you would consider?
User avatar
john2jer
RealGM
Posts: 15,304
And1: 452
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
 

Re: Keep Jefferson, Trade Love for Randolph 

Post#22 » by john2jer » Mon Jan 11, 2010 5:05 pm

I don't really want to trade either of them, I think our problems are in the SF/SG area, not Love/Jefferson, BUT BUT BUT, if we HAVE to trade one of them, we move Jefferson way before Love. Love is like the one guy on our team that fits what we're trying to do. Plus he's 20, on his rookie deal, and one of the best rebounders and passing big men in the league.

Love's not untouchable, but he's the closest thing we have that's currently playing for the Wolves. It would take quite a bit for me to consider moving him at this point.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
User avatar
horaceworthy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,650
And1: 250
Joined: Jan 17, 2006
Location: Ruining Fuddrucker's for everyone

Re: Keep Jefferson, Trade Love for Randolph 

Post#23 » by horaceworthy » Mon Jan 11, 2010 5:10 pm

jade_hippo wrote:Do the Warriors do a deal sending out their "MVP" talent without us getting the pleasure of taking Maggette off their hands?

I'd do a Jefferson for Randolph + Maggette deal. Not sure where the Warriors would stand on that, although I'm pretty sure where their fans would.
"A while back,'' Cardinal said, "I took a picture of the standings and texted it to Love, just to bust his chops,'' Cardinal said. "He sent me a picture back of a snowdrift.''
Narf
Head Coach
Posts: 6,550
And1: 882
Joined: Sep 05, 2009

Re: Keep Jefferson, Trade Love for Randolph 

Post#24 » by Narf » Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:00 pm

Did you lose a bet with a Golden State fan or something?
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Keep Jefferson, Trade Love for Randolph 

Post#25 » by moss_is_1 » Mon Jan 11, 2010 8:00 pm

mandurugo wrote:I think you guys are a little too fond of Love. He's a good player, but hardly someone you can't trade. He's not a fan draw, he hasn't turned around the fortunes of the team, what keeps him from the trading block? I'm not saying he has to go or that he should be given away, but if Rambis' concerns about the ability for the two guys to play together is right, of course you trade either Love or Jefferson for the right offer. I get that some people don't think this is it, but is there any offer you would consider?


We are alot better team with him. I think he's already better than Al. He plays solid defense, is a great passer, good shooter, amazing rebounder on both ends, gets to the ft line at a good rate, and does all the little things.
TDWOLVESFAN
Sophomore
Posts: 180
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 08, 2008

Re: Keep Jefferson, Trade Love for Randolph 

Post#26 » by TDWOLVESFAN » Mon Jan 11, 2010 8:02 pm

Kevin Love is a player much like Rambis was. He'll score points, but he doesn't have to score to be effective. How many players besides Love take as much pride in rebounding as they do scoring? I think there are less than 20 in the league. Love still has a lot to learn about not telegraphing passes, individual defense and maybe when to keep his mouth shut. He has improved in every aspect of the game from last year and seems to want to continue to do so.

Love is a better fit than Jefferson for what Rambis is trying to do with this team.
I've been a fan since the beginning and I will be until my end.
User avatar
horaceworthy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,650
And1: 250
Joined: Jan 17, 2006
Location: Ruining Fuddrucker's for everyone

Re: Keep Jefferson, Trade Love for Randolph 

Post#27 » by horaceworthy » Mon Jan 11, 2010 8:28 pm

moss_is_1 wrote:We are alot better team with him. I think he's already better than Al. He plays solid defense, is a great passer, good shooter, amazing rebounder on both ends, gets to the ft line at a good rate, and does all the little things.

He's a better player than this year's version of Al, but he's not playing better than Al was when Al went down last year. We're a better team with him, but honestly, even if you factored out our 2-16 start, we'd still have the second worst winning % in the league, so it's tough to say that we're a lot better with him. Calling him a solid defender is generous as well. He puts in a good effort and has good awareness, but he's still got a ways to go.
"A while back,'' Cardinal said, "I took a picture of the standings and texted it to Love, just to bust his chops,'' Cardinal said. "He sent me a picture back of a snowdrift.''
funkatron101
General Manager
Posts: 7,741
And1: 1,177
Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Location: St. Paul

Re: Keep Jefferson, Trade Love for Randolph 

Post#28 » by funkatron101 » Mon Jan 11, 2010 8:31 pm

TDWOLVESFAN wrote:Kevin Love is a player much like Rambis was. He'll score points, but he doesn't have to score to be effective. How many players besides Love take as much pride in rebounding as they do scoring? I think there are less than 20 in the league. Love still has a lot to learn about not telegraphing passes, individual defense and maybe when to keep his mouth shut. He has improved in every aspect of the game from last year and seems to want to continue to do so.

Love is a better fit than Jefferson for what Rambis is trying to do with this team.

This post is spot on.
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,344
And1: 12,203
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: Keep Jefferson, Trade Love for Randolph 

Post#29 » by Worm Guts » Mon Jan 11, 2010 9:05 pm

Trade Jefferson for Oden, and Love for Randolph. Sure there's about a 40% chance that they both flame out we're forced to burn the Target Center to the ground, but there's about a 5% chance they both reach their superstar potential and we win the next 10 NBA championships.
allweneedisLOVE
Banned User
Posts: 2,742
And1: 27
Joined: Dec 06, 2009

Re: Keep Jefferson, Trade Love for Randolph 

Post#30 » by allweneedisLOVE » Mon Jan 11, 2010 9:54 pm

LOL ^
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: Keep Jefferson, Trade Love for Randolph 

Post#31 » by Devilzsidewalk » Mon Jan 11, 2010 10:14 pm

TDWOLVESFAN wrote:Kevin Love is a player much like Rambis was. He'll score points, but he doesn't have to score to be effective. How many players besides Love take as much pride in rebounding as they do scoring? I think there are less than 20 in the league. Love still has a lot to learn about not telegraphing passes, individual defense and maybe when to keep his mouth shut. He has improved in every aspect of the game from last year and seems to want to continue to do so.

Love is a better fit than Jefferson for what Rambis is trying to do with this team.


I agree w/ the general idea behind this, Love doesn't need a bunch of touches to be effective. Most upper players in the NBA need to molest the ball for 48 minutes to be effective, but Love puts up numbers just being on the court. Instead of waiting for the ball to find him, he goes and gets it off the glass in the paint and on the perimeter he knows when to move it and when to shoot it (more or less)
Image

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves