ImageImageImageImageImage

Artest versus Rodman

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

verticalhops
Senior
Posts: 680
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 18, 2009
Location: Boston

Artest versus Rodman 

Post#1 » by verticalhops » Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:20 am

Hey Laker fans,

how does artest compare to Rodman. I realise Rodman is another dimension in terms of rebounding but as an overall defender how does Artest stack up?
Itmotep
Sophomore
Posts: 245
And1: 3
Joined: Nov 08, 2006

Re: Artest versus Rodman 

Post#2 » by Itmotep » Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:28 pm

Comparing Artest to Rodman is like comparing a Chihuahua to a Doberman Pinscher.
User avatar
Sofa King
RealGM
Posts: 19,352
And1: 3,044
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Contact:
 

Re: Artest versus Rodman 

Post#3 » by Sofa King » Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:17 pm

Tough choice but Rodman had to defend guys like Karl Malone and Charles Barkley in his day. Rodman was even on the best Bulls team. I go with Rodman on this one but it's not as wide open as I would have thought.
DubaLakers
Banned User
Posts: 3,830
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 02, 2007
Location: OC, CA

Re: Artest versus Rodman 

Post#4 » by DubaLakers » Wed Jan 27, 2010 11:00 pm

Artest is hurt (planter faciitus), and learning a whole new offense where to get his looks, unfair comparison ATM imo.
Quincy
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,463
And1: 5
Joined: Dec 02, 2009

Re: Artest versus Rodman 

Post#5 » by Quincy » Thu Jan 28, 2010 2:54 am

Well comparing current Artest(last 3 years) to any Rodman would be silly. Prime Artest(or any version for that matter) is a better scorer though.
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,128
And1: 33,800
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: Artest versus Rodman 

Post#6 » by Slava » Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:28 am

Artest is the much better offensive player but Rodman is one of the best rebounders of all time and edges out in the man defense part.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
Laker_Love
Sophomore
Posts: 194
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 13, 2005
Location: Irvine

Re: Artest versus Rodman 

Post#7 » by Laker_Love » Fri Jan 29, 2010 6:20 pm

rodman > artest.

rodman was muchhhhhhhhhh better than artest on the defensive end. not only in terms or rebounds but just being a shut down defender. yes he had no offensive game, but artest isnt exactly a great offensive player as well...he has inflated offensive stats because he was allowed to take a bunch of shots on all the teams he's been on, he has a horrendous career 42% field goal percentage
User avatar
Mamba Venom
RealGM
Posts: 17,979
And1: 582
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: California
Contact:

Re: Artest versus Rodman 

Post#8 » by Mamba Venom » Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:25 am

The main thing is what does Artest do to get in the heads of the best in the game.

Can he get LBJames or Pierce to throw a punch at him. Can he weird them out with his gay experiences... no but Rodman could. Rodman put the Bulls over the hump vs. Jazz and made the Mailman want to see a councilor. Rodman was very smart and really crazy where Artest just didnt mature.

Artest is still a huge asset to the Lakers but what game has Artest single handily won?
Lakers are 22-3 in OT last 6 seasons:Kobe best OT closer!
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,128
And1: 33,800
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: Artest versus Rodman 

Post#9 » by Slava » Sat Jan 30, 2010 11:04 am

Mamba Venom wrote:Artest is still a huge asset to the Lakers but what game has Artest single handily won?


Way too early to pull that out and no Rodman never won a game single handedly when MJ was on the team. He surely was a game changer though.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
User avatar
Jase
RealGM
Posts: 13,051
And1: 158
Joined: Aug 01, 2008
Location: Grand Rapids, MI.

Re: Artest versus Rodman 

Post#10 » by Jase » Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:49 pm

Rodman was a crackhead, but he knew what he was doing. He knew when he started to get in someone's head, and he would crack that wide open. I remember in the 96 Finals when he started messing with Frank Brickowski....he would just stare at him when someone was shooting free throws, and he would claim the mental battle every time. Artest isn't about the mental aspect of the game as much as simply playing solid man-to-man defense. It's a tough comparison to make because they were two totally different players who played different positions and had different approaches to their skill.
"A winner listens. A loser just waits until it's their turn to talk."
verticalhops
Senior
Posts: 680
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 18, 2009
Location: Boston

Re: Artest versus Rodman 

Post#11 » by verticalhops » Sun Jan 31, 2010 1:37 pm

Didn't Rodman average 30ppg in college? Thats mindblowing
User avatar
Jaykoolzboy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,316
And1: 122
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
       

Re: Artest versus Rodman 

Post#12 » by Jaykoolzboy » Tue Feb 2, 2010 4:10 am

It's one of the biggest myth in the history of NBA that Dennis had 0 offensive power. He is not a good scorer, not even a O.K scorer, but worm got some great post moves under the basket back in those Piston days. It's like Rodman know his role and just focus on his role, he is a capable 15ppg scorer if he really wants to. Talking about 0 offense, that's Ben Wallace.
LAKESHOW
RealGM
Posts: 18,057
And1: 4,471
Joined: Mar 14, 2002
Location: HOME OF THE 17 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!

Re: Artest versus Rodman 

Post#13 » by LAKESHOW » Tue Feb 2, 2010 4:24 am

rodman can jump out of the building. dude was long and reached out with his length to get rebounds. add to that he had a HIGH VERTICAL LEAP to get up. artest is a tough guy, but he is build lower to the ground, and his game stays down there. rodman is known as an alltime great at something. rebounding. artest is not known as an alltime great at anything.

but still, artest is tough. and thats all we need for him to be, fill the role of toughguy.
Home of the 17 Time World Champions
User avatar
Speedlot
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,164
And1: 720
Joined: Jan 01, 2007
         

Re: Artest versus Rodman 

Post#14 » by Speedlot » Thu Feb 4, 2010 9:40 am

Rodman would beat the living hell out of Artest.

Return to Los Angeles Lakers