ImageImageImageImageImage

ALL TRADE TALK HERE!

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,064
And1: 3,840
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: ALL TRADE TALK HERE! 

Post#181 » by vincecarter4pres » Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:45 pm

stevieboy wrote:Hey what do you guys think about this trade if we don't get Wall.

Nets trade Harris,TWA,Yi and our Dallas1st for Nash.I'm not sure if this gets us Nash or if its to much.I mean if its not enough we could always throw in a future pick because this trade obviously stops the rebuilding and puts us in win now mode.I figured they would want TWA over CDR or Lee thats why i put him in there.

We'd save some money in this deaI 2010/11.I wouldn't have a problem signing Amare if we had Nash.Would we be able to sign Rudy Gay and Amare if this went down?We'd still have our lottery pick and 2nd rnder.Re-sign Hayes pick up a back up for Brook.I don't watch a lot of college ball but i'm sure we can grab a good wing player with our pick if we can't sign Rudy or whoever.

top 4 pick/2nd rnder
Nash/Dooling
CDR/Lee
Rudy/Hayes
Amare/Humps
Brook

It's too much for Nash.
I also don't know how I feel about Nash and Amar'e, or Nash at all.
I obviously like him better then Harris, but there maybe better ways to use Harris as an asset then this.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
User avatar
51X3RF4N
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,159
And1: 935
Joined: Feb 14, 2008
       

Re: ALL TRADE TALK HERE! 

Post#182 » by 51X3RF4N » Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:47 pm

Did you know that there is a rumor from Hollinger of Bynum for Harris/Lopez??

I saw this somewhere and I'm trying to verify it. Does that make any sense? I thought Lopez is far better than Bynum...why would he be included AND Harris?

Sorry I don't follow the Nets much.
Your Future Sixers

C- Embiid/?
PF- ?/?
SF- ?/?
SG- ?/?
PG- ?/?
SteveNets15
Starter
Posts: 2,335
And1: 6
Joined: Jan 25, 2008
Location: NJNETS

Re: ALL TRADE TALK HERE! 

Post#183 » by SteveNets15 » Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:14 pm

^^^^thats horrible.I wouldn't watch basketball if that went down.
Preludepunk27
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,650
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 26, 2005
Location: New Hampshire

Re: ALL TRADE TALK HERE! 

Post#184 » by Preludepunk27 » Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:58 pm

That is probably a move that would actually make me stop being a Nets fan. As good as a lot of people think Bynum is, I honestly believe he's one of the most overrated players in basketball. That is just my personal opinion though so don't castrate me.
Image
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 29
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

Re: ALL TRADE TALK HERE! 

Post#185 » by NetsForce » Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:16 am

I'm guessing that the Lakers offered Bynum for Harris + Lopez and the Nets laughed / turned them down... In that since there was a discussion between the two teams but it wasn't a serious one.
JKiddy
Starter
Posts: 2,242
And1: 496
Joined: Jul 28, 2002

Re: ALL TRADE TALK HERE! 

Post#186 » by JKiddy » Sun Jan 31, 2010 1:23 am

Thoughts?

http://www.realgm.com/src_checktrade.ph ... id=5418396

Quick hit:

If Thorn knows Lebron and Wade will not come to the Nets for sure. Does he make this move?

Amare will want the max or extremely close to it and Gay wants like 12 mill a year.. (last year he said he wanted a 5 year 60 million).

If we signed both of those guys for that... and let the expirings expire... would we have a chance at signing Joe Johnson at all?

We would be trading a first rounder in the Memphis deal (say 2012) and trading the Dallas pick this year in the Phoenix end... this would save us a few bucks as well....

Possible lineup next year without signing Joe Johnson:

Harris
Williams/Lee
Gay
Amare
Lopez

That's pretty solid. Plus you add in our first round pick and our second round pick.... and a Yi as our 6th man... hmmm...
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,064
And1: 3,840
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: ALL TRADE TALK HERE! 

Post#187 » by vincecarter4pres » Sun Jan 31, 2010 1:30 am

So wait, memphis is going to send us Gay for Boone?! :laugh:
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 29
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

Re: ALL TRADE TALK HERE! 

Post#188 » by NetsForce » Sun Jan 31, 2010 1:35 am

You know dawg... I'm going to post on the feedback forum and get them to look into seeing if you have more than one account I don't appreciate the stupidity.
User avatar
jeff1624
RealGM
Posts: 25,127
And1: 1,076
Joined: Jan 19, 2005
Location: NYC
Contact:
   

Re: ALL TRADE TALK HERE! 

Post#189 » by jeff1624 » Sun Jan 31, 2010 1:54 am

:rofl: I actually refreshed my browser to see if I was getting it wrong. Rudy Gay for Josh boone??? WTF?..

I don't know if you have more than one acount and you're just trying to make us look bad but.. c'mon..
Dat Leadership
User avatar
60cent
Pro Prospect
Posts: 825
And1: 47
Joined: Dec 07, 2005
Location: St. Andrews's Field

Re: ALL TRADE TALK HERE! 

Post#190 » by 60cent » Sun Jan 31, 2010 3:44 am

Ahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!

I love this game!!
User avatar
jerseyjac
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,956
And1: 34
Joined: Nov 01, 2001

Re: ALL TRADE TALK HERE! 

Post#191 » by jerseyjac » Sun Jan 31, 2010 3:01 pm

JMac1 wrote:I posted this on our site as well.

I love the fact that we all have our excellent trade ideas, but the reality is,

1. Heat....... Suns don't like Bealsey, other than him everything sucks in Miami. We'd be trading for trash, expiring and a mid round pick.

2. Bulls.....Thomas is okay, but not enough by himself for Amare, and the rest of the Bulls have bad contracts (Hinrich and Deng) and that equals spending on a rebuilding team.

3. GS........AR is a nice young piece, but you have to take a bad contract along i.e. Maggette, hinders rebuilding.

4. That brings us to NJ.........They have an expiring in Simmons. They have youngs in TWILL, CDR, LEE, picks, and they have a high profile "young" player with some potential in Yi. I just see this being the best and most simple trade possible.

The Suns don't add money. Avoid "super" trash and bad contracts. The Suns get a possible future 2 in Lee (more likely, because he is a better shooter say you guys, I've been reading) or TWill, Dallas pick, and Yi(someone who will bring a HUGE fan base). Yi and Nash, come on?! Pub citty. Yi maybe Frye 2.0 but he is "young" and doesn't cost anything.


As far as JRich, the Suns can be patient and let him expire next year. Free up more money to sign our players or a FA IF neccessary.

Now someone tell me honestly, how is this not the best situation for the Suns?

Plus, the Nets want Amare! Go to the Nets site, hoopshype or ask Amare!

Harris or Wall
Evan Turner
Twill
Amare
Lopez

Nets fans and Billionaire owner would like that lineup, done deal, am I wrong?
JMac1
Suns Forum Training Specialist
Posts: 10,032
And1: 4,004
Joined: May 23, 2009

Re: ALL TRADE TALK HERE! 

Post#192 » by JMac1 » Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:28 pm

jerseyjac wrote:
JMac1 wrote:I posted this on our site as well.

I love the fact that we all have our excellent trade ideas, but the reality is,

1. Heat....... Suns don't like Bealsey, other than him everything sucks in Miami. We'd be trading for trash, expiring and a mid round pick.

2. Bulls.....Thomas is okay, but not enough by himself for Amare, and the rest of the Bulls have bad contracts (Hinrich and Deng) and that equals spending on a rebuilding team.

3. GS........AR is a nice young piece, but you have to take a bad contract along i.e. Maggette, hinders rebuilding.

4. That brings us to NJ.........They have an expiring in Simmons. They have youngs in TWILL, CDR, LEE, picks, and they have a high profile "young" player with some potential in Yi. I just see this being the best and most simple trade possible.

The Suns don't add money. Avoid "super" trash and bad contracts. The Suns get a possible future 2 in Lee (more likely, because he is a better shooter say you guys, I've been reading) or TWill, Dallas pick, and Yi(someone who will bring a HUGE fan base). Yi and Nash, come on?! Pub citty. Yi maybe Frye 2.0 but he is "young" and doesn't cost anything.


As far as JRich, the Suns can be patient and let him expire next year. Free up more money to sign our players or a FA IF neccessary.

Now someone tell me honestly, how is this not the best situation for the Suns?

Plus, the Nets want Amare! Go to the Nets site, hoopshype or ask Amare!

Harris or Wall
Evan Turner
Twill
Amare
Lopez

Nets fans and Billionaire owner would like that lineup, done deal, am I wrong?



Thanks for the post. BTW, most Suns fans think Yi is trash. There is suspposedly an offer like that on the table waiting for the Suns approval, I don't know, but if it is, is Yi that bad?
DirtyDez
Suns Forum College Scout
Posts: 17,168
And1: 6,900
Joined: Jun 25, 2009
Location: the Arizona desert

Re: ALL TRADE TALK HERE! 

Post#193 » by DirtyDez » Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:06 pm

Yi>Frye. He'd fine in the Suns' system, can stretch the floor. Better rebounder and scorer than Frye.
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
Jersey Generals
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,446
And1: 414
Joined: May 19, 2008

Re: ALL TRADE TALK HERE! 

Post#194 » by Jersey Generals » Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:39 pm

Yiwould be fine in the Suns' system: he's long, can stretch out the floor, and can score if he's playing aggressive. However, he can be (most of the time he is) a black hole and doesn't play defense.
JMac1
Suns Forum Training Specialist
Posts: 10,032
And1: 4,004
Joined: May 23, 2009

Re: ALL TRADE TALK HERE! 

Post#195 » by JMac1 » Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:56 pm

Jersey Generals wrote:Yiwould be fine in the Suns' system: he's long, can stretch out the floor, and can score if he's playing aggressive. However, he can be (most of the time he is) a black hole and doesn't play defense.


Thanks and F'... A black hole with no defense! That's not good. :(
Talentfull
Pro Prospect
Posts: 787
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 06, 2009

Re: ALL TRADE TALK HERE! 

Post#196 » by Talentfull » Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:34 pm

Meh, I'm not big on Amare to be honest, especially if we're gonna pay him 17+mil...I'd rather have David Lee if that's the case.
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,064
And1: 3,840
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: ALL TRADE TALK HERE! 

Post#197 » by vincecarter4pres » Mon Feb 1, 2010 12:10 am

Talentfull wrote:Meh, I'm not big on Amare to be honest, especially if we're gonna pay him 17+mil...I'd rather have David Lee if that's the case.

I'm kind of feeling this way as well. I was never big on Amar'e. Actually, I was quite the opposite. It just so happened this season has been so pitiful and it sounded as though Amar'e was going to come on the cheap(asset wise), that I got real excited.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
JMac1
Suns Forum Training Specialist
Posts: 10,032
And1: 4,004
Joined: May 23, 2009

Re: ALL TRADE TALK HERE! 

Post#198 » by JMac1 » Mon Feb 1, 2010 4:05 am

vincecarter4pres wrote:
Talentfull wrote:Meh, I'm not big on Amare to be honest, especially if we're gonna pay him 17+mil...I'd rather have David Lee if that's the case.

I'm kind of feeling this way as well. I was never big on Amar'e. Actually, I was quite the opposite. It just so happened this season has been so pitiful and it sounded as though Amar'e was going to come on the cheap(asset wise), that I got real excited.


be careful about players who are good on trash teams. Lee over Amare? Wow!
User avatar
tigerblood
Pro Prospect
Posts: 826
And1: 8
Joined: Jan 13, 2009

Re: ALL TRADE TALK HERE! 

Post#199 » by tigerblood » Mon Feb 1, 2010 4:49 am

JMac1 wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:
Talentfull wrote:Meh, I'm not big on Amare to be honest, especially if we're gonna pay him 17+mil...I'd rather have David Lee if that's the case.

I'm kind of feeling this way as well. I was never big on Amar'e. Actually, I was quite the opposite. It just so happened this season has been so pitiful and it sounded as though Amar'e was going to come on the cheap(asset wise), that I got real excited.


be careful about players who are good on trash teams. Lee over Amare? Wow!


At a minimum, Amar'e is good for 20/9 on any team. I'm sure that once he's traded, he will have a major chip on his shoulder.
deviljets7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,536
And1: 29
Joined: Feb 16, 2005

Re: ALL TRADE TALK HERE! 

Post#200 » by deviljets7 » Mon Feb 1, 2010 4:58 am

JMac1 wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:
Talentfull wrote:Meh, I'm not big on Amare to be honest, especially if we're gonna pay him 17+mil...I'd rather have David Lee if that's the case.

I'm kind of feeling this way as well. I was never big on Amar'e. Actually, I was quite the opposite. It just so happened this season has been so pitiful and it sounded as though Amar'e was going to come on the cheap(asset wise), that I got real excited.


be careful about players who are good on trash teams. Lee over Amare? Wow!


I don't think they are saying that Lee is a better player than Amare. I think they are saying that having Lee at $10-11 million >> having Amare at $17 million.
enetric wrote:You have the perfect fat% to sit on your butt, eat crap and WATCH someone else do it though. Hell, at that body fat% you might be a starter.

Return to Brooklyn Nets