ImageImageImage

Lakers versus Celtics. 1/31/10

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

User avatar
IEcelticfan
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,368
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 21, 2007

Re: Lakers versus Celtics. 1/31/10 

Post#401 » by IEcelticfan » Mon Feb 1, 2010 2:53 pm

KobeFarmarEra wrote:
Banks2Pierce wrote:
sprash9802 wrote:
Yea we can beat any of the other top teams in a 7 game series. We almost beat Orlando last year without KG.


And you've lost 3 straight to the Lakers.


where it counts .... for all the marbles ..... right, er....wait .....
Kefa461
RealGM
Posts: 12,530
And1: 430
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Location: Member of Celtic Nation since '64
       

Re: Lakers versus Celtics. 1/31/10 

Post#402 » by Kefa461 » Mon Feb 1, 2010 3:26 pm

Again......not being healthy but just add Daniels.....the C's lost by 2..9...and 1 point. Yeah the C's suck so bad. One player in that rotation would make a difference. But no the C's suck. Take a player out of the rotation of the Hawks game..or the Magic....or from the Lakers and ....but no the C's suck for the rest of season. I think the C's will be fine before Playoff time.






8-)
WE ARE CELTIC NATION
17 TITLES, ON TO #18.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,302
And1: 69,910
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Lakers versus Celtics. 1/31/10 

Post#403 » by Celts17Pride » Mon Feb 1, 2010 4:00 pm

Kefa461 wrote:Again......not being healthy but just add Daniels.....the C's lost by 2..9...and 1 point. Yeah the C's suck so bad. One player in that rotation would make a difference. But no the C's suck. Take a player out of the rotation of the Hawks game..or the Magic....or from the Lakers and ....but no the C's suck for the rest of season. I think the C's will be fine before Playoff time.

8-)


Celtics will be fine and Daniels will help but I still say the Celtics need a backup PG and a rebounding PF. Leon Powe's loss really hurts because Big Baby is not the physiscal player Leon was for the Celtics. A legit backup PG would solve a lot of the issues the Celtics have now.
Ben-N1ce
RealGM
Posts: 21,735
And1: 20,097
Joined: Jul 18, 2009
       

Re: Lakers versus Celtics. 1/31/10 

Post#404 » by Ben-N1ce » Mon Feb 1, 2010 4:51 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:
Kefa461 wrote:Again......not being healthy but just add Daniels.....the C's lost by 2..9...and 1 point. Yeah the C's suck so bad. One player in that rotation would make a difference. But no the C's suck. Take a player out of the rotation of the Hawks game..or the Magic....or from the Lakers and ....but no the C's suck for the rest of season. I think the C's will be fine before Playoff time.

8-)


Celtics will be fine and Daniels will help but I still say the Celtics need a backup PG and a rebounding PF. Leon Powe's loss really hurts because Big Baby is not the physiscal player Leon was for the Celtics. A legit backup PG would solve a lot of the issues the Celtics have now.


Agreed. Without additions the current lineup even with Marquis it is not good enough. Good enought to win 1 round but then beat an ATL ORL and CLEV back to back...highly unlikely.
LAKESHOW
RealGM
Posts: 18,088
And1: 4,484
Joined: Mar 14, 2002
Location: HOME OF THE 17 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!

Re: Lakers versus Celtics. 1/31/10 

Post#405 » by LAKESHOW » Mon Feb 1, 2010 5:22 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:
Kefa461 wrote:Again......not being healthy but just add Daniels.....the C's lost by 2..9...and 1 point. Yeah the C's suck so bad. One player in that rotation would make a difference. But no the C's suck. Take a player out of the rotation of the Hawks game..or the Magic....or from the Lakers and ....but no the C's suck for the rest of season. I think the C's will be fine before Playoff time.

8-)


Celtics will be fine and Daniels will help but I still say the Celtics need a backup PG and a rebounding PF. Leon Powe's loss really hurts because Big Baby is not the physiscal player Leon was for the Celtics. A legit backup PG would solve a lot of the issues the Celtics have now.


well, the celtics to me have all of the weapons. the problem? no offensive cohesion in their gameplan. when they won a coupla years ago, i thought that they had probably the best defensive team i have EVER seen. the celtics would shut down teams that they couldnt even throw a basketball into the pacific ocean. that good. however, that OVERT EMPHASIS on a defensive philosophy brings with it a skiddish mentality on offense. the offense sputters and the mindset is "its ok, because we can always get it back on the defensive end" rivers is a championship coach, so you cant complain, he won the chip. but winning long term demands offensive execution. and i didnt see that in several games this year, including the LAKER game.
Home of the 17 Time World Champions
kobeaki
Veteran
Posts: 2,742
And1: 6
Joined: Aug 10, 2006

Re: Lakers versus Celtics. 1/31/10 

Post#406 » by kobeaki » Mon Feb 1, 2010 7:18 pm

hey guys, not trolling, that game yesterday was great, for us obviously, but it was the first time ever with a game between our teams that was relatively clean and hard fought on both sides, look we are both pretty beat up, and ray payed some killer perfect d on the last shot...i guess i am saying for the first time ever i wouldve been ok had we lost that game because it was so good to watch...you guys know what i mean? anyhow see ya in a couple of weeks...
ucp.php?i=profile&mode=signature

XuDa wrote:Magic, Bird and the other 80#s HOF'ers were holding the league back and stunting it's development big time.


:lol:
hourockman
Banned User
Posts: 2,684
And1: 3
Joined: May 03, 2009

Re: Lakers versus Celtics. 1/31/10 

Post#407 » by hourockman » Mon Feb 1, 2010 8:04 pm

Celtsfan1980 wrote:
hourockman wrote:
chakdaddy wrote:Bynum looked good...he might be the first Laker star since West and Baylor that wasn't acquired because a guy demanded to go to LA or some other circumstance leading to a gift of a trade...must be a nice feeling.


Cousy, Bird, McHale, Parish, and KG say hi.

They drafted Larry Legend with several other teams before them so I can't see how they were handed him. Garnett was 31 and Jefferson 22 so there's no way I consider that trade as lopsided.
Lakers history:
Handed Mikan.
Handed Chamberlain.
Handed Jabaar.
Handed Magic.
Handed Kobe.
Handed Shaq.
Handed Gasol.
I'll give them credit for West(Baylor was an elite prospect so that was more obvious) and Bynum's looking good but the rest of Laker history is based on teams giving them gifts or players like Kobe and Shaq wanting to play there. Not impressed.


Lol. Bird was "handed" to the C's just as much as Magic was "handed" to the Lakers. His pick arose out of that franchise swap with Buffalo. Magic came from a trade (draft picks involved) 3 yrs prior in the day when there was no such thing as protected picks. So did Worthy. So did the #1 pick that you traded for McHale and Parish. That's all luck, not being handed anything.

How the hell were they handed Shaq? He was a free agent. They were handed Shaq because he wanted to go there?

They got Jabbar because Milwaukee wanted a center and the Knicks couldn't scrounge one up. Jabbar did narrow the choices down, I'll give you that.

Handed Kobe as in "We want your starting center for this 17 year old guard" (the first guard ever to enter the draft out of HS).

They got Mikan out of a dispersal draft among all the fledgling teams in the NBL.
Banks2Pierce
RealGM
Posts: 15,783
And1: 5,324
Joined: Feb 23, 2004
   

Re: Lakers versus Celtics. 1/31/10 

Post#408 » by Banks2Pierce » Mon Feb 1, 2010 8:25 pm

Yea, I'd say handed shaq and Kobe. It's hollywood and it's a desirable place. Kobe, from all reports I've read, wouldn't have reported to charlotte.

But, who cares? We can't knock a team for where they play. It's not their fault.
hourockman
Banned User
Posts: 2,684
And1: 3
Joined: May 03, 2009

Re: Lakers versus Celtics. 1/31/10 

Post#409 » by hourockman » Mon Feb 1, 2010 10:27 pm

Banks2Pierce wrote:Yea, I'd say handed shaq and Kobe. It's hollywood and it's a desirable place. Kobe, from all reports I've read, wouldn't have reported to charlotte.


Charlotte took him w/ the expressed purpose of trading him for Flope Diva due to them losing Zo to the Heat a year prior. They had Matt Geiger, Father Time Parish, and George Zidek taking turns starting for them in 95/96. Their GM Bob Bass told the press that they didn't want a 17 y.o. guard. The trade was already pre-conceived, Charlotte didn't want Kobe.

You're thinking of the Nets. It's been rumored that they were told Kobe wouldn't report, but they were interested in Kittles and Kobe and took Kittles.
Bgil
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,812
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 16, 2005

Re: Lakers versus Celtics. 1/31/10 

Post#410 » by Bgil » Mon Feb 1, 2010 10:46 pm

Kefa461 wrote:Again......not being healthy but just add Daniels.....the C's lost by 2..9...and 1 point. Yeah the C's suck so bad. One player in that rotation would make a difference. But no the C's suck. Take a player out of the rotation of the Hawks game..or the Magic....or from the Lakers and ....but no the C's suck for the rest of season. I think the C's will be fine before Playoff time.


We beat you last year without Bynum. Neither Bynum or Ariza (2 starters) played in the Finals.
"I'm sure they'll jump off the bandwagon. Then when we do get back on top, they're going to want to jump back on, and we're going to tell them there's no more room." - Kobe in March of 2005
hourockman
Banned User
Posts: 2,684
And1: 3
Joined: May 03, 2009

Re: Lakers versus Celtics. 1/31/10 

Post#411 » by hourockman » Mon Feb 1, 2010 10:53 pm

hourockman wrote:
Lol. Bird was "handed" to the C's just as much as Magic was "handed" to the Lakers. His pick arose out of that franchise swap with Buffalo. Magic came from a trade (draft picks involved) 3 yrs prior in the day when there was no such thing as protected picks. So did Worthy. So did the #1 pick that you traded for McHale and Parish. That's all luck, not being handed anything.


I'll go further on this one. The Pistons, Jazz, and Cavs (the three teams that gave up their picks to LA and Boston), weren't in the position to pay for 1st rounders back then. Perhaps you could say that Boston and LA preyed upon their weaknesses in that regard, but by cosmic coincidence, all 3 of those teams wound up w/ the worst records in the seasons where Magic, Worthy, and Bostons 1980 #1 were up for bids and Bos/LA won all 3 coin tosses. That makes 3 times where the #1 pick was lost by a team in a 4 yr span, which ushered in the era of protected picks. GS was stupid enough to consider JBC the best player in the draft instead of the White Salamander.

The financial landscape of the league today seems a bit like it was then. A team like LA can take advantage of poorer teams merely thru legal trades. Memphis thought they needed cap relief and Kwame had the biggest expiring K out there. Hard to fathom why fans are so resistant to acknowledging that in light of the F'd up economy that we're all living in. Their general dislike for the Lakers seems to be the reason.

* In 82, Utah was forced to sell the 3rd pick (Nique) to Atlanta for John Drew and a million bucks. They lost both the 1st and the 3rd picks. Given that they weren't on the brink of collapse during those years, they could have theoretically had a combination of Magic + Dantley + Cummings or Worthy or Nique or a trade of the pick to fill their 1 or 5 spot. Alas, Joesph Smith didn't prophesize it.

* Magic's pick came about as compensation for Gail Goodrich signing as a vet FA w/ New Orleans in 1976. Rules at the time stated that some compensation to the losing team was required. NO chose to give up future picks, one of them was their "highest 1st rounder in 1979".

^ That's the way pro sports is. Too much context involved to make claims like "they were handed this and that". You'd also have to be a fool to think that Boston and LA weren't USUALLY going to succeed in personnel ventures when they had people like Auerbach, Sharman, and West in their front offices. Are we to riddle ourselves with guilt over those advantages too?
Celtsfan1980
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,853
And1: 192
Joined: Mar 25, 2008

Re: Lakers versus Celtics. 1/31/10 

Post#412 » by Celtsfan1980 » Mon Feb 1, 2010 11:31 pm

hourockman wrote:Lol. Bird was "handed" to the C's just as much as Magic was "handed" to the Lakers. His pick arose out of that franchise swap with Buffalo. Magic came from a trade (draft picks involved) 3 yrs prior in the day when there was no such thing as protected picks. So did Worthy. So did the #1 pick that you traded for McHale and Parish. That's all luck, not being handed anything.

How the hell were they handed Shaq? He was a free agent. They were handed Shaq because he wanted to go there?

They got Jabbar because Milwaukee wanted a center and the Knicks couldn't scrounge one up. Jabbar did narrow the choices down, I'll give you that.

Handed Kobe as in "We want your starting center for this 17 year old guard" (the first guard ever to enter the draft out of HS).

They got Mikan out of a dispersal draft among all the fledgling teams in the NBL.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1977%E2%80%9378_NBA_season
I've read a lot on Celtic history and I've never read anything about that. According to the Wikipedia site, there were 5 teams worse than them. They drafted Bird with the sixth pick, so that would mean that was their own pick. I'll admit the Dennis Johnson trade was ridiculous and they should not have had Cousy but it would appear Bird was legitimately drafted.

Free agency just means you're getting a player for nothing. Even lopsided trades at least involve some players being traded and you're not getting a player for absolutely nothing. Scouts haven't looked at high school players as much so it makes them harder to judge. Vlade Divac wasn't very good to begin with, and my understanding is Kobe refused to play for the Nets. They would have drafted him if he hadn't said anything.
LAKESHOW
RealGM
Posts: 18,088
And1: 4,484
Joined: Mar 14, 2002
Location: HOME OF THE 17 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!

Re: Lakers versus Celtics. 1/31/10 

Post#413 » by LAKESHOW » Tue Feb 2, 2010 1:00 am

DubaLakers wrote:
LAKESHOW wrote:a coupla things.

the pushoff did have acting involved. i mean, with that push, you dont go into the 6th row or whatever it was. but the point is, when the ARM IS EXTENDED like pierce' was, it gives the refs a look. and the look that the ref saw was the EXTENDED ARM from pierce. that in and of itself was "just enough" to make the call legit. send an armbar, or elbow bent look and it looks like nothing, but the extension gave enough of a quality look for the ref to blow the whistle.

secondly, the celtics gameplan of running at kobe was working. he was givin up the rock. but in the final seconds of the game, WHO ELSE IS GONNA GET THE BALL?? with that knowledge, the celtics chose to go 1 on 1 with kobe. that was a bad decision.


it was great D by Ray Allen no one else in the game could have made that shot Kobe's made that one quite a few times before it's just off the charts difficulty no fault of Allen's.


exactly. its not allens fault he was stuck 1 on 1. but if staff had seen tape of miami game, milwaukee game, sacramento game . . . etc... they wouldve known NOT to take him 1 on 1.
Home of the 17 Time World Champions
artest420
Junior
Posts: 441
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 02, 2007

Re: Lakers versus Celtics. 1/31/10 

Post#414 » by artest420 » Tue Feb 2, 2010 6:56 pm

Celtsfan1980 wrote:
hourockman wrote:
chakdaddy wrote:Bynum looked good...he might be the first Laker star since West and Baylor that wasn't acquired because a guy demanded to go to LA or some other circumstance leading to a gift of a trade...must be a nice feeling.


Cousy, Bird, McHale, Parish, and KG say hi.

They drafted Larry Legend with several other teams before them so I can't see how they were handed him. Garnett was 31 and Jefferson 22 so there's no way I consider that trade as lopsided.
Lakers history:
Handed Mikan.
Handed Chamberlain.
Handed Jabaar.
Handed Magic.
Handed Kobe.
Handed Shaq.
Handed Gasol.
I'll give them credit for West(Baylor was an elite prospect so that was more obvious) and Bynum's looking good but the rest of Laker history is based on teams giving them gifts or players like Kobe and Shaq wanting to play there. Not impressed.


F**K the Lakers. those BS calls always go their way.
DubaLakers
Banned User
Posts: 3,830
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 02, 2007
Location: OC, CA

Re: Lakers versus Celtics. 1/31/10 

Post#415 » by DubaLakers » Tue Feb 2, 2010 9:16 pm

Kobe was what drafted 17th and who's fault is that that JWest is brilliant, 17th? Vlade was a what top 5 center in the league probably without looking, Vlade hit prime in Sacto not LA.
User avatar
TonyMontana
RealGM
Posts: 11,726
And1: 398
Joined: Apr 27, 2006
Location: Loungin in the Cali sun.
     

Re: Lakers versus Celtics. 1/31/10 

Post#416 » by TonyMontana » Tue Feb 2, 2010 9:19 pm

artest420 wrote:
Celtsfan1980 wrote:

They drafted Larry Legend with several other teams before them so I can't see how they were handed him. Garnett was 31 and Jefferson 22 so there's no way I consider that trade as lopsided.
Lakers history:
Handed Mikan.
Handed Chamberlain.
Handed Jabaar.
Handed Magic.
Handed Kobe.
Handed Shaq.
Handed Gasol.
I'll give them credit for West(Baylor was an elite prospect so that was more obvious) and Bynum's looking good but the rest of Laker history is based on teams giving them gifts or players like Kobe and Shaq wanting to play there. Not impressed.


F**K the Lakers. those BS calls always go their way.


Im just amazed how a game thread goes from the game itself to the history of the franchise then to the trades and who got hand outs and then to conspiracy and now this post???
Image
USA
Banned User
Posts: 5,871
And1: 455
Joined: Nov 11, 2008
       

Re: Lakers versus Celtics. 1/31/10 

Post#417 » by USA » Tue Feb 2, 2010 9:37 pm

DubaLakers wrote:Kobe was what drafted 17th and who's fault is that that JWest is brilliant, 17th? Vlade was a what top 5 center in the league probably without looking, Vlade hit prime in Sacto not LA.

Just to clarify, Kobe was drafted 13th not 17th. Carry on.

Return to Boston Celtics